Skip to main content
Log in

Defining ‘Religion’ and ‘Atheism’

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are various background issues that need to be discussed whenever the topic of conversation turns to religion and atheism. In particular, there are questions about how these terms are to be used in the course of the conversation. While it is sometimes the case that all parties to a conversation about religion and atheism have agreed what they mean by ‘religion’ and ‘atheism’, it is often enough the case that such conversations go poorly because the parties mean different things by ‘religion’ and ‘atheism’. In this paper, I discuss a range of questions about the meanings of ‘religion’ and ‘atheism’ that should be taken into account when we are asking global questions about ‘religion’ and ‘atheism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Atheists. (2020). ‘What is atheism?https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/about-atheism/. Accessed 15 July 2020.

  • Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, L. and Tomlins, S. (2015). Atheist identities: Spaces and social contexts. Springer.

  • Berger, P. (2014). ‘Is atheism a specifically Western phenomenon?’. The American Interesthttps://www.the-american-interest.com/2014/11/26/is-atheism-a-specifically-western-phenomenon/. Accessed 15 July 2020.

  • Bruce, S. (2011). Defining religion: A practical response. International Review of Sociology, 21, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalacoura, K. (2014). ‘The secular in non-Western societies’. The Immanent Framehttps://tif.ssrc.org/2014/02/11/the-secular-in-non-western-societies/. Accessed 15 July 2020

  • Droogers, A. (2009). ‘Defining religion: A social science approach’ in P. Clarke (ed.). The Oxford handbook of sociology. Oxford University Press, 263–79.

  • Dubuisson, D. (2007). The Western construction of religion. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. Oxford University Press.

  • Gallie, W. (1956). Art as an essentially contested concept. Philosophical Quarterly, 6, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2015). ‘Definitions’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/definitions/. Accessed 15 July 2020.

  • Harrison, V. (2006). The pragmatics of defining religion in a multi-cultural world. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 59, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.

  • Haslanger, S. (2000). ‘Gender and race: [What] are they? [What] do we want them to be? Nous, 34, 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, P. and Mandaville, P. (2010). Globalisation and culture, volume 2: Globalising religions. Sage.

  • James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green & Co.

  • Jenkins, K. (2016). Amelioration and inclusion: Gender identity and the concept of woman. Ethics, 126, 394–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, J. (2012). The invention of religion in Japan. University of Chicago Press.

  • Keller, J., Bullik, R., & Klein, C. (2018). Profiling atheist world views in different cultural contexts: Developmental trajectories and accounts’. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10, 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvachira, J. (2011). The problem of defining religion. Divyadaan, 22, 377–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, M. (2012). Atheism as culture and condition: Nietzschean reflections on the contemporary invisibility of profound godlessness. Approaching Religion, 2, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1967). A Defence of Atheism. In P. Edwards & A. Pap (Eds.), A modern introduction to philosophy (revised, pp. 460–473). Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., et al. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. (2005). Cross-national correlation of quantifiable societal health with popular religiosity and secularism in popular democracies. Journal of Religion and Society, 7, 1–17.

  • Paul, G. (2009). The chronic dependence of popular religiosity upon dysfunctional psychosocial conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 398–441.

  • Quack, J. (2011). Disenchanting India: Organised rationalism and criticism of religion in India. Oxford University Press.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford University Press.

  • Ryrie, A. (2019). Unbelievers: An emotional history of doubt. Harvard University Press.

  • Smith, G. (1991). Atheism, Ayn Rand, and other heresies. Prometheus.

  • Smith, W. (1963). The meaning and end of religion. Macmillan.

  • Thomas, R. (2017). Atheism and unbelief among Indian scientists: Towards an anthropology of atheism(s). Society and culture in South Asia, 3, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom: volume 1. John Murray.

  • Zdybicka, Z. (2005). ‘Atheism’ in A. Maryniaczyk (ed.) Universal encyclopedia of philosophy. Polish Thomas Aquinas Association. http://ptta.pl/pef/haslaen/a/atheism.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to two anonymous referees for the journal who provided friendly critical comments on the initial draft of this paper. I am pleased to have been able to improve the work by following their advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Oppy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper is an invited contribution for the issue guest-edited by Sanjit Chakraborty and Anway Mukhopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oppy, G. Defining ‘Religion’ and ‘Atheism’. SOPHIA 60, 517–529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00843-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00843-7

Keywords

Navigation