Elsevier

Calphad

Volume 74, September 2021, 102304
Calphad

Modification of Lu's (2005) high pressure model for improved high pressure/high temperature extrapolations. Part I: Modeling of platinum at high pressure/high temperature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102304Get rights and content

Abstract

Calphad description at high pressure is a very important topic. Several models have been proposed in the literature. The model proposed by Lu et al. (X.-G. Lu, M. Selleby and B. Sundman, Comput. Coupling Phase Diagr. Thermochem., 29 (2005) 49-55) is very convenient in many aspects. But it has been criticized for giving unphysical extrapolations in certain conditions. We show that this model is indeed suitable if additional constraints on several parameters are made in order to obtain consistent extrapolations when both high pressure and high temperature are considered. This revised model will be applied to the complete description of the Os–Pt system. In this first part, the thermodynamic assessment of platinum in both solid and liquid phases is presented. The use of DFT and phonon calculated data provided in the present work will be shown to be useful for the thermodynamic assessment. A consistent description of Pt at high pressure and temperature (equation of state) including the liquid phase and phase diagram is given for the first time.

Introduction

Modeling of both thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams at high pressure is very important not only for geological applications. It is also needed for the description of materials under thermomechanical stress, impact or explosion, for the prediction of molar volume... High pressure properties are obviously also strongly related to the basic physics of the materials. The models used must combine the possibility to reproduce well the data, the ease of use and accurate extrapolations. There exist different high pressure models in the literature that can be used in the frame of the Calphad methodology: Mie-Grüneisen (1912), Murnaghan (1944), Birch-Murnaghan (1947), Refs. [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. However, there is no consensus about which is preferable.

Among them, the model by Lu et al. [2] has had indisputable achievements. It is particularly interesting because it has been implemented in the Thermo-Calc software, it is relatively easy to handle, it can treat any phase, solid or liquid, stable or metastable, and it follows the Calphad formalism in its extrapolation possibilities to multi-component systems. However, it has been criticized for leading to sometimes erroneous extrapolations at high pressure and/or temperature (negative entropy and specific heat). We will describe the limitations of this model in more detail and their origin will be investigated. Solutions will be proposed in order to avoid the problems of extrapolation. It will be finally demonstrated that it may be used safely with the proposed modifications and that, in most cases, it should be preferred as being simpler, easier to handle and because it is better adapted to the frame of the Calphad method, to the description of complete systems and to the extrapolation to multicomponent systems.

As an application, the example of platinum at extreme pressure and temperature will be detailed in the present paper. A thermodynamic assessment of the available experimental data together with calculated data obtained in this work will be described. In the second part of this study [9], this model will be applied to the complete description of Os–Pt binary system .

Section snippets

Description of Lu's model

In high pressure models, the Gibbs energy is described with an additional contribution taking into account the temperature and pressure dependence of the volume:G=G(T,p0)+p0pV(T,p)dp

In Lu's model [2], the volume is described as a function of pressure using the Grover equation, itself derived from the Murnaghan model (see the original paper for the complete description and derivation of the equations). Finally, the volume is calculated as a function of temperature and pressure in Equation (9)

Reported problems

Soon criticisms about this model appeared in the literature. The main criticism is that the model yields nonphysical extrapolated values of Cp and entropy. As an example, in Fig. 1, the Cp of bcc Fe is calculated from the assessment of Lu et al. [2]. The figure shows that negative Cp are obtained at high temperature at pressures above 100 GPa.

Brosh et al. [5] analyzed the problem as being due to an ‘incompatibility’ between the SGTE description of the Cp and the Mie-Grüneisen equation. By

Possible solution

It is always possible to fit the volume as a linear function of temperature (no curvature in the volume curve or constant thermal expansion). As can be inferred from Eq. (9), it would allow to maintain a constant Cp as a function of pressure. This would however be a crude approximation resulting in a poor description of the data and therefore of the thermodynamic properties. Another option is to keep a good description of the low pressure thermal expansion data but make the thermal expansion

Application

We present here an application of the modified model to the description of platinum. This system has been chosen because a lot of data is available up to very high pressure. It is also important because platinum may be used as a pressure standard in high pressure diffraction experiments. Both fcc and liquid phases will be described allowing a calculation of the pressure–temperature phase diagram.

Other models

As observed in the introduction, many models are available in the literature. We will limit our comparison to the most recent ones [[5], [6], [7],51]. These models are based on the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Debye-Grüneisen model, or the modeling of phonon frequencies, respectively. They offer very sound and complete approaches encompassing a closer relation to the physics and a superior use of DFT data and phonon calculations.

However, as a consequence of their link to the DFT or phonon

Conclusion

A modification has been proposed to Lu's (2005) model to suppress the anomalous extrapolation of specific heat and entropy at high temperatures and pressures. With this modification, we have shown that such anomalies are not present in a typical system like platinum which has been described completely including the liquid phase. A model is always a tradeoff between accuracy, predictability and usability. Modified Lu's model is indeed so easy to handle compared to many other models that it

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

DFT calculations were performed using HPC resources from GENCI CINES (Grant A0080906175).

References (64)

  • A. Karbasi et al.

    The thermodynamics of several elements at high pressure, Calphad: Comput

    Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem.

    (2011)
  • Y. Fei et al.

    Experimental study and thermodynamic calculations of phase relations in the Fe-C system at high pressure

    Earth Planet Sci. Lett.

    (2014)
  • D. Huang et al.

    Modeling of the molar volume of the solution phases in the Al-Cu-Mg system, Calphad: Comput

    Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem.

    (2015)
  • S. Bigdeli et al.

    An insight into using DFT data for Calphad modeling of solid phases in the third generation of Calphad databaes, a case study for Al

    Calphad

    (2019)
  • B. Sundman et al.

    A method for handling the extrapolation of solid crystalline phases to temperature far above their melting point

    Calphad Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem.

    (2020)
  • L. Stixrude et al.

    Thermodynamics of mantle materials - I. Physical properties, Geophys

    J. Intell.

    (2005)
  • X.-G. Lu et al.

    A CALPHAD Helmholtz energy approach to calculate thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of fcc Cu

    Philos. Mag.

    (2009)
  • M.H.G. Jacobs et al.

    Thermodynamic properties and equation of state of fcc aluminum and bcc iron, derived from a lattice vibrational method

    Phys. Chem. Miner.

    (2010)
  • J.-M. Joubert et al.

    Modification of Lu’s (2005) high pressure model for improved high pressure/high temperature extrapolations. Part II: modeling of osmium–platinum system at high pressure/high temperature

    Comput Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem.

    (2021)
  • A. Fernández Guillermet

    Critical evaluation of the thermodynamic properties of molybdenum

    Int. J. Thermophys.

    (1985)
  • J.W. Arblaster

    Crystallographic properties of platinum

    Platin. Met. Rev.

    (1997)
  • J.W. Arblaster

    Crystallographic properties of platinum

    Platin. Met. Rev.

    (2006)
  • S. Mehmood et al.

    Thermophysical properties of platinum-copper alloys

    Metall. Mater. Trans. A

    (2012)
  • P.-F. Paradis et al.

    Thermophysical properties of platinum group metals in their liquid undercooled and superheated phases

    Jonhson Matthey Tech

    (2014)
  • U.E. Klotz et al.

    Thermophysical properties of platinum-rich alloys measured by sessile drop experiments

    High Temp.

    (2016)
  • A. Dewaele et al.

    Equations of state of six metals above 94 GPa

    Phys. Rev.

    (2004)
  • C.-S. Zha et al.

    P-V-T equation of state of platinum to 80 GPa and 1900 K from internal resistive heating/X-ray diffraction measurements

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2008)
  • S. Anzellini et al.

    In situ characterization of the high pressure-high temperature melting curve of platinum

    Sci. Rep.-UK

    (2019)
  • M. Matsui et al.

    The temperature-pressure-volume equation of state of platinum

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2009)
  • Xiaoli Huang et al.

    In situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction with laser-heated diamond anvil cells study of Pt up to 95 GPa and 3150 K

    RSC Adv.

    (2015)
  • J.A. Morgan
    (1974)
  • S.P. Marsh

    LASL Shock Hugoniot Data

    (1980)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text