skip to main content
research-article

Configurational Path to Chinese Reading Stickiness of Digital Library

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 June 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Attracting and retaining readers in an increasingly competitive environment is an urgent problem for digital libraries of original literature. However, few empirical studies address online reading stickiness, particularly the factors affecting the promotion of online reading stickiness, in what combinations or paths these effects exist, and whether there are complementary, alternative, and inhibitory relationships among the factors. To solve the practical problems and fill the theoretical gap, we use a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to study the interaction effects of the flow experience (feeling of immersion and perceived pleasure), technology acceptance model (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use), and customer participation (information sharing and interpersonal interaction) to identify the critical configurations leading to a high level of stickiness in online reading and to verify the complementarity, substitution, and inhibition relationships among these variables. The findings provide implications for further research on complexity theory in digital libraries of original literature, and for managers to view and redesign online reading stickiness as configurations of IT and psychological capabilities. This study enriches and develops the existing theories and expands the application of the qualitative comparative analysis method in the field of digital libraries.

References

  1. iResearch. 2019. China's Digital Reading Sector Report. http://report.iresearch.cn/wx/report.aspx?id=3390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chinabaogao. Analysis Report on China's Online Literature Industry in 2018-In-depth Market Research and Development Prospect Forecast. http://baogao.chinabaogao.com/hulianwang/341775341775.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Zott, R. Amit, and J. Donlevy. 2000. Strategies for value creation in e-commerce: Best practice in europe. Eur. Manage. J. 18, 5 (2000), 463–475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. H. Lu and M. Lee. 2010. Demographic differences and the antecedents of blog stickiness. Online Inf. Rev. 34, 1 (2010), 21–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Li, G. J. Browne, and J. C. Wetherbe. 2006. Why do internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective. Int. J. Electr. Comm. 10, 4 (2006), 105–141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. H. Wu, S. C. Wang, and H. H. Tsai. 2010. Falling in love with online games: The uses and gratifications perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 6 (2010), 1862–1871. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. S. Chiang and K. L. Hsiao. 2015. YouTube stickiness: The needs, personal, and environmental perspective. Internet Res. 1, 25 (2015), 85–106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. W. T. Wang, Y. S. Wang, and E. R. Liu. 2016. The stickiness intention of group-buying websites: The integration of the commitment–trust theory and e-commerce success model. Inf. Manage. 53, 5 (2016), 625–642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Xu, Y. Qi, and X. Li. 2018. What affects the user stickiness of the mainstream media websites in China? Electr. Comm. Res. Appl. 29, 3 (2018) 124–132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. He Li et al. 2010. A review on overseas evaluation of digital library. J. Libr. Sci. Chin. 36, 6 (2010), 88–94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. I. Yuelin, N. Liang, and Q. I. Xue. 2016. From interaction dimensions to interaction function: Developing a theoretical model for evaluating interaction in digital libraries. J. Libr. Sci. Chin. 42, 1 (2016), 66–82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Junren, Y. Shiying, Y. Yanni, et al. 2014. A study of mobile library-oriented technology acceptance model. Inf. Document. Serv. 35, 5 (2014), 49–55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Li. Wu and Z. Xing. 2016. Understanding the continuance intention of social reading apps by college students. J. Libr. Sci. Chin. 42, 1 (2016), 52–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. WenJun Zhao and Jian Ren. 2017. An analysis of the impact on continuance intention of mobile reading service—based on cognitive dimension, social dimension and emotional dimension. Inf. Sci. 35, 8 (2017), 72–78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu Li. 2017. The effects of perceived value on users satisfaction and loyalty towards e⁃book reading applications. J. Libr. Sci. Chin. 06 (2017), 37–51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Luchuan Liu and Xu Li. 2018. Social reading users' exit, voice, loyalty and neglect behaviors from the perspective of psychological contract. J. Libr. Sci. Chin. 44, 04 (2018), 91–110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. X. Peng, P. Yantao, and Z. Jiuzhen. 2018. A study of university and college students' academic reading format preference and behavior in mainland china: A comparative research supported by global survey data. J. Libr. Sci. Chin. 44, 1 (2018), 62–75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Nakamura and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. The concept of flow. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.). Springer, London, 239–263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. L. Hoffman and T. P. Novak. 2009. Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. J. Interact. Market. 23, 1 (2009), 23–34. DOI:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. C.-L. Hsu, C.-C. Wu, and M.-C. Chen. 2013. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of e-satisfaction and e-loyalty: Focusing on the role of flow and its antecedents. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manage. 11, 2 (2013), 287–311. DOI:10.1007/s10257-012-0194-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. I. Shim, S. Forsythe, and W.-S. Kwon. 2015. Impact of online flow on brand experience and loyalty. J. Electr. Comm. Res. 16, 1 (2015), 56–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. I. Guang-Ming, C. Wang-Chun, G. Yue, et al. 2016. Web interactivity effects on satisfaction in e-tailing—The mediating roles of telepresence and flow. Soft Sci. 30, 1 (2016), 115–119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Zhang, L. Guo, M. Hu, and W. Liu. 2017. Influence of customer engagement with company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation. Intl. J. Info. Mgt. 37 (2017), 229–240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. H. Hsiao, L. F. Chen, C. C. Chang, and F. H. Chiu. 2016. Configurational path to customer satisfaction and stickiness for a restaurant chain using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. J. Bus. Res 69, 8 (2016), 2939–2949.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. G. L. Polites, C. K. Williams, E. Karahanna, et al. 2012. A theoretical framework for consumer e-satisfaction and site stickiness: An evaluation in the context of online hotel reservations. J. Organiz. Comput. Electr. Comm. 22, 1 (2012), 1–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. H. Li, L. Yong, X. Xu, et al. 2015. Modeling hedonic is continuance through the uses and gratifications theory: An empirical study in online games. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48 (2015), 261–272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. X. Jun and W. Lin-Ying. 2012. Research on antecedents of online shopping stickiness. Financ. Trade Res. 23, 4 (2012), 126–132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yangquan Li and Lu Li. 2016. Pleasure production in online novels: “Delight”, “feeling of projection” and the new change of literature. Human. Soc. Sci. J. Hainan Univ. 34, 3 (2016), 81–88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Bing Zhou. 2017. Symptoms and challenges of Internet novel reading addiction. Mod. Liter. Mag. 01 (2017), 155–159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Y. Chen and Z. Lin. 2018. Fashionability vis-à-vis rationality: Investigating factors driving users’ e-tourism website stickiness. Curr. Issues Tour. 21, 1 (2018), 41–57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. R. Filieri, F. McLeay, and B. Tsui. 2017. Antecedents of travellers’ satisfaction and purchase intention from social commerce websites. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. R. Schegg, B. Stangl, (Eds.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 517–528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. F. D. Davis. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts[J]. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 38, 3 (1993), 475–487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. W. Hong, J. Y. L. Thong, W. M. Wong, et al. 2001. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 18, 3 (2001), 97–124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. G. Tsakonas and C. Papatheodorou. 2008. Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Inf. Process. Manage. 44, 3 (2008), 1234–1250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. S. Buchanan and A. Salako. 2009. Evaluating the usability and usefulness of a digital library. Libr. Rev. 58, 9 (2009), 638–651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. M. M. Jeon and M. Jeong. 2017. Customers’ perceived website service quality and its effects on e-loyalty. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage. 29, 1 (2017), 438–457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wei Tang and Weiyang Zhang. 2018. New era sailing and new generation breakthrough: Overview of the major network literature websites in 2017. J. Hunan Univ. Technol. 23, 05 (2018), 25–29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. N. F. Isa, N. A. Rosli, F. Hakim, and M. F. Irina. 2017. Impact of web and digital experience on the stickiness of third party hotel website. J. Tour. Hosp. Culin. Arts 9, 2 (2017), 399–410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Junren Ming and Chuanhui Huang. 2014. Investigation and analysis of college mobile library from perspective of user acceptance. Res. Libr. Sci. 6 (2014), 21–28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. R. P. Bagozzi and U. M. Dholakia. 2006. Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. Int. J. Res Market. 23, 1 (2006), 45–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. J. Ortiz, W. H. Chih, and H. C. Teng. 2017. Electronic word of mouth in the taiwanese social networking community: Participation factors. Internet Res. 27, 5 (2017), 1058–1084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. J. Imlawi. 2017. Health website success: User engagement in health-related websites. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol 11, 6 (2017), 49–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Zhu Liye, Yuan Denghua, and Hao Jia. 2018. Research on the effect of customer engagement in brand co-creation on brand commitment in virtual brand community—The mediating effects of brand experience. Chin. J. Manage. 15, 2 (2018), 262–271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. C. T. Ennew and M. R. Binks. 1999. Impact of participative service relationships on quality, satisfaction and retention: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Res. 46, 2 (1999), 121–132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. R. Agarwal and E. Karahanna. 2000. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage 1. Mis. Quart. 24, 4 (2000), 665–694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. A. Bhattacherjee. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. Mis. Quart. 25, 3 (2001), 351–370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. M. Koufaris. 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst Res. 13, 2 (2002), 205–223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis. 2010. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decis. Sci. 27, 3 (2010), 451–481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. P. C. Fiss. 2011. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manage. J. 54, 2 (2011), 393–420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. C. Maomao, Z. Jing, L. Yanhui, et al. 2017. The achievement mechanisms of the platform ambidexterity: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Nankai Bus. Rev. 20, 3 (2017), 65–76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Shengli Deng and Shaoxiong Fu. 2017. Applying qualitative comparative analysis to library and information science: A case study of influencing factors of network community health information seeking. information studies. Theory Appl. 40, 12 (2017), 23–28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Configurational Path to Chinese Reading Stickiness of Digital Library

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
          ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 20, Issue 5
          September 2021
          320 pages
          ISSN:2375-4699
          EISSN:2375-4702
          DOI:10.1145/3467024
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 June 2021
          • Revised: 1 March 2021
          • Accepted: 1 March 2021
          • Received: 1 November 2020
          Published in tallip Volume 20, Issue 5

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Refereed
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format