Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 9, 2021

Local existence and uniqueness of skew mean curvature flow

  • Chong Song ORCID logo

Abstract

The Skew Mean Curvature Flow (SMCF) is a Schrödinger-type geometric flow canonically defined on a co-dimension two submanifold, which generalizes the famous vortex filament equation in fluid dynamics. In this paper, we prove the local existence and uniqueness of general-dimensional SMCF in Euclidean spaces.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11971400

Funding statement: The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11971400).

A Appendix

Let F:Σnm be a compact immersed submanifold. In this appendix, we show that the energy k=vol+Hp2+AHk,22 is equivalent to the Sobolev norm of the Gauss map ¯k=dρWk,22, where the Sobolev norms will be defined later. For a preliminary introduction to the geometry of Grassmannian manifolds and Gauss maps, we refer to [27].

Let D denote the usual connection of the exterior product space Λ:=Λnm, which is induced by the standard derivative on m. Let denote the Levi-Civita connection of the Grassmannian manifold G:=G(n,m-n) and let ΠΓ(T*GT*GNG) denote the second fundamental form of G as a submanifold in Λ. We can regard Π as an 1-form Π=Πadya on G, where each entry ΠaΓ(T*GNG) is a linear map from TG to NG.

The Gauss map of F is a map ρ:ΣGΛ. We will still denote the pull-back connections on the pull-back bundles ρ*TΛ(T*Σ)s and ρ*TG(T*Σ)s by D and , respectively. Then applying D on dρΓ(ρ*TGT*Σ), we have

Ddρ=(Ddρ)+(Ddρ)=dρ+ρ*Π(dρ),

where ρ*Π=Πaiρadxi is the pull-back 1-form on Σ. Since we can identify dρ with the second fundamental form A of the immersion F, we can write the above equality as

DA=A+#Π(ρ)A2,

where # denotes linear combinations. Taking once more derivative, we get

D2A=DA+D(#Π(ρ)A2)
=(2A+#ΠAA)+(#DΠA3+##ΠDAA)
=2A+#ΠAA+#(DΠ+#ΠΠ)A3.

Inductively, we can derive for any k1,

(A.1)DkA=kA+J#CJ(Π)j1#AjsA,

or equivalently,

(A.2)Dkdρ=kA+J#CJ(Π)j1#dρjsdρ,

where CJ(Π) is a linear combination of Π and its derivatives, and the summation is taken for all indices J=(j1,,js) with

0jik-1andi(ji+1)=iji+s=k+1,

Now for k1, define the Sobolev norms

AHk,2=(l=0k|lA|2)12,

and

dρWk,2=(l=0k|Dldρ|2)12.

Theorem A.1.

Let F:ΣnRm be a compact immersed submanifold, kl0:=[n2], and suppose vol+HpB for some p>n. Then there exist two constants C1(k,B) and C2(k,B) which only depend on k and B (and is independent of the submanifold) such that

(A.3)AHk,2C1(k,B)i=1k+1dρWk,2i

and

(A.4)dρWk,2C2(k,B)i=1k+1AHk,2i.

Proof.

Since by assumption vol+HpB, we have uniform interpolation inequalities by Theorem 2.4. Then in view of (A.1) and (A.2), the proof follows step by step from [8, Proposition 2.2 ]. ∎

Theorem A.2.

Suppose F:ΣnRm is a compact immersed submanifold and let kl0:=[n2]. Then the energy

k=vol+Hp2+AHk,22

is equivalent to

¯k=ρWk+1,22.

Namely, there exist two functions fk and gk which only depend on k (and is independent of the submanifold) such that

¯kfk(k),kgk(¯k).

Proof.

First note that |ρ|=1 since the image of ρ lies in G which is contained in the unit sphere in Λ. Thus

|ρ|2=volandρWk+1,22=vol+dρWk,22.

If we take B=k in Theorem A.1, then by (A.4),

¯k=vol+dρWk,22vol+C2(k,B)i=1k+1AHk,2i.

So it is easy to find the desired function fk such that ¯kfk(k).

On the other hand, by letting j=1, k=l0+1, r=, q=2 in the universal interpolation inequality of Theorem 2.1, we have

Ap=dρpCDl0dρ21l0+1ρ1-1l0+1C¯k1l0+1,

where p=2(l0+1)>n. Therefore, we get

vol+Hp2B:=¯k+C¯k2l0+1.

Then by (A.3) in Theorem A.1, there exists a function gk such that kgk(¯k). ∎

Acknowledgements

Part of this work was carried out during a visit at Tsinghua University from September 2017 to February 2018. The author would like to thank Professor Yuxiang Li, Huaiyu Jian and Hongyan Tang for their support and hospitality. He is also grateful to Professor Yu Yuan, Jingyi Chen and Youde Wang for stimulating conversations and their generous help over the past several years.

References

[1] T. Aubin, Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry, Springer Monogr. Math., Springer, Berlin 1998. 10.1007/978-3-662-13006-3Search in Google Scholar

[2] I. Bejenaru, A. D. Ionescu, C. E. Kenig and D. Tataru, Global Schrödinger maps in dimensions d2: Small data in the critical Sobolev spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 173 (2011), no. 3, 1443–1506. 10.4007/annals.2011.173.3.5Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Cantor, Sobolev inequalities for Riemannian bundles, Differential geometry. Part 2 (Stanford 1973), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 27, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1975), 171–184. 10.1090/pspum/027.2/0380873Search in Google Scholar

[4] B.-L. Chen and L. Yin, Uniqueness and pseudolocality theorems of the mean curvature flow, Comm. Anal. Geom. 15 (2007), no. 3, 435–490. 10.4310/CAG.2007.v15.n3.a1Search in Google Scholar

[5] Q. Chen, J. Jost and G. Wang, The maximum principle and the Dirichlet problem for Dirac-harmonic maps, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 47 (2013), no. 1–2, 87–116. 10.1007/s00526-012-0512-5Search in Google Scholar

[6] W. Ding, On the Schrödinger flows, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. II (Beijing 2002), Higher Education Press, Beijing (2002), 283–291. 10.1142/9789813220881_0039Search in Google Scholar

[7] W. Ding and Y. Wang, Schrödinger flow of maps into symplectic manifolds, Sci. China Ser. A 41 (1998), no. 7, 746–755. 10.1142/9789813220881_0033Search in Google Scholar

[8] W. Ding and Y. Wang, Local Schrödinger flow into Kähler manifolds, Sci. China Ser. A 44 (2001), no. 11, 1446–1464. 10.1142/9789813220881_0038Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. H. Gomez, Binormal motion of curves and surfaces in a manifold, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor 2004; Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Huang and D. Tataru, Local well-posedness of skew mean curvature flow for small data in d4 dimensions, preprint (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00358. Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. L. Jerrard, Vortex filament dynamics for Gross–Pitaevsky type equations, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 1 (2002), no. 4, 733–768. Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. L. Jerrard and D. Smets, On the motion of a curve by its binormal curvature, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17 (2015), no. 6, 1487–1515. 10.4171/JEMS/536Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce and L. Vega, The Cauchy problem for quasi-linear Schrödinger equations, Invent. Math. 158 (2004), no. 2, 343–388. 10.1007/s00222-004-0373-4Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. Khesin, Symplectic structures and dynamics on vortex membranes, Mosc. Math. J. 12 (2012), no. 2, 413–434, 461–462. 10.17323/1609-4514-2012-12-2-413-434Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. Khesin and C. Yang, Higher-dimensional Euler fluids and Hasimoto transform: Counterexamples and generalizations, Nonlinearity 34 (2021), no. 3, 1525–1542. 10.1088/1361-6544/abe1d1Search in Google Scholar

[16] M.-C. Lee and J. M. Ma, Uniqueness theorem for non-compact mean curvature flow with possibly unbounded curvatures, preprint (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00253. 10.4310/CAG.2021.v29.n6.a6Search in Google Scholar

[17] Z. Li, Global 2D Schrödinger map flows to Kähler manifolds with small energy, preprint (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10924. 10.29007/h5vsSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Z. Li, Global regularity of high dimensional skew mean curvature flows with small data in Hk, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14011. 10.29007/qwpkSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Z. Li, Global transversal stability of Euclidean planes under skew mean curvature flow evolutions, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021), no. 1, Paper No. 57. 10.1007/s00526-021-01921-xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] F. Linares and G. Ponce, Introduction to nonlinear dispersive equations, 2nd ed., Universitext, Springer, New York 2015. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2181-2Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Mantegazza, Smooth geometric evolutions of hypersurfaces, Geom. Funct. Anal. 12 (2002), no. 1, 138–182. 10.1007/s00039-002-8241-0Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. McGahagan, An approximation scheme for Schrödinger maps, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 32 (2007), no. 1–3, 375–400. 10.1080/03605300600856758Search in Google Scholar

[23] F. Merle, P. Raphaël and I. Rodnianski, Blowup dynamics for smooth data equivariant solutions to the critical Schrödinger map problem, Invent. Math. 193 (2013), no. 2, 249–365. 10.1007/s00222-012-0427-ySearch in Google Scholar

[24] J. H. Michael and L. M. Simon, Sobolev and mean-value inequalities on generalized submanifolds of n, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 26 (1973), 361–379. 10.1002/cpa.3160260305Search in Google Scholar

[25] I. Rodnianski, Y. A. Rubinstein and G. Staffilani, On the global well-posedness of the one-dimensional Schrödinger map flow, Anal. PDE 2 (2009), no. 2, 187–209. 10.2140/apde.2009.2.187Search in Google Scholar

[26] B. N. Shashikanth, Vortex dynamics in 4, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), no. 1, Article ID 013103. 10.1063/1.3673800Search in Google Scholar

[27] C. Song, Gauss map of the skew mean curvature flow, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), no. 11, 4963–4970. 10.1090/proc/13615Search in Google Scholar

[28] C. Song and J. Sun, Skew mean curvature flow, Commun. Contemp. Math. 21 (2019), no. 1, Article ID 1750090. 10.1142/S0219199717500900Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Song and Y. Wang, Uniqueness of Schrödinger flow on manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom. 26 (2018), no. 1, 217–235. 10.4310/CAG.2018.v26.n1.a5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-01
Revised: 2021-03-13
Published Online: 2021-05-09
Published in Print: 2021-07-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2021-0023/html
Scroll to top button