Skip to main content
Log in

Detection Method of DC Microgrid Network Attack Based on Two-level and Multi-segment Model

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because the current method of attack detection of current flow microgrid is slow, it leads to the increase of detection time. Therefore, a two-stage segmentation model based attack detection method for DC microgrid network is proposed. The structure of DC microgrid is analyzed, the model of DC microgrid network is constructed, and the sparse region of the micro grid network is divided. According to the results of regional division, a two-level and multi-segment model is constructed, which is composed of the above-level central neural network and the lower level is edge end neural network. The parallel computing structure of the model is set up to get the attack detection results of DC microgrid network. The experimental results show that the method has high recall and precision, low error detection rate and short detection time, which can realize the rapid and accurate detection of network attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chettibi, N., Mellit, A., Sulligoi, G., & Pavan, M. A. (2018). Adaptive neural network-based control of a hybrid AC/DC microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(99), 1667–1679.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bharothu, J. N., Sridhar, M., & Rao, R. S. (2018). Modified adaptive differential evolution based optimal operation and security of AC-DC microgrid systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 103(12), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beg, O. A., Nguyen, L. V., Johnson, T. T., & Davoudi, A. (2019). Signal temporal logic-based attack detection in DC microgrids. Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on, 10(4), 3585–3595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuming, X., Shaoyong, H. U., Shaomin, Z., & Lili, L. (2017). Network attack detection method for DC microgrid based on improved convolution neural network. Netinfo Security, 35(11), 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ming, S., Xiaobin, Z., & Automation, S. O. (2018). Detection method of DC microgrid network attack based on abnormal data fusion. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 36(03), 528–535.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, J. S., Liang, S. J., & Zuo, J. L. (2020). DC microgrid network attack detection method based on composite classifier. Information technology and network security, 39(10), 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhargav, R., Bhalja, B. R., & Gupta, C. P. (2019). A new algorithm for fault detection and localization in a mesh type bipolar DC microgrid network. IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, 13(15), 3311–3322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhargav, R., Bhalja, B. R., & Gupta, C. P. (2020). Novel fault detection and localization algorithm for low-voltage DC microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(7), 4498–4511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, J., & Sun, B. (2019). A network attack detection method using SDA and deep neural network based on internet of things. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 12(1), 2135–2142.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sklavounos, D., Chountasis, S., & Edoh, A. (2020). Network attack detection method based on their time-frequency decomposition. International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics, 8(4), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thilagaraj, M., Krishnakumar, R., Kiruthika, S., Meena, K., HariBalaKrishnan, S., & Logeswaran, M. V. (2021). IoT based embedded system for continuous healthcare monitoring. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 4420–4424.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnakumar, R., Thilagaraj, M., Arulkumar, P., Balraj, S., Pradeepa, G., Srinidhi, S., & Vivitha, V. (2021). library management system using arduino. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 4420–4424.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramani, U., Thilagaraj, M., & KrishnaRadhakrishnanNair, R. (2021). Neural network based hybrid power scheme with constant output using three DC source. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thilagaraj, M., Arunkumar, N., Ramkumar, S., & Hariharasitaraman, S. (2021). Electrooculogram signal identification for elderly disabled using elman network. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 82, 103811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, R., Jiang, H. W., & Liu, F. Q. (2019). A network attack detection method based on signal and noise separation. Computer Era, 12(10), 1-4+8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arularasan, A. N., Suresh, A., & Seerangan, K. (2018). Identification and classification of best spreader in the domain of interest over the social networks. Cluster Computing, 22(Suppl 2), 4035–4045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2616-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Suresh, A., Kumar, R., & Varatharajan, R. (2020). Health care data analysis using evolutionary algorithm. Journal of Supercomputing, 76, 4262–4271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2302-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, H., Li, Y., Lv, Z., Sangaiah, A. K., & Huang, T. (2020). A real-time and ubiquitous network attack detection based on deep belief network and support vector machine. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 7(3), 790–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo, Y., Miao, F., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2019). CATH: An effective method for detecting denial-of-service attacks in software defined networks. Ence China Information Ences, 62(03), 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liang, C. C., Shu, G., Bao, X. L., Zhi, G. L., & Zheng, W. J. (2020). FEW-NNN: A fuzzy entropy weighted natural nearest neighbor method for flow-based network traffic attack detection. China Communications, 17(05), 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ozay, M., Esnaola, I., Vural, F. T. Y., & Kulkarni, S. R. (2017). Machine learning methods for attack detection in the smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks & Learning Systems, 27(8), 1773–1786.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has been not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liren Zou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, L. Detection Method of DC Microgrid Network Attack Based on Two-level and Multi-segment Model. Wireless Pers Commun 127, 1665–1681 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08711-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08711-w

Keywords

Navigation