The effect of different lower detection thresholds in microdosimetric spectra and their mean values

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106626Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The influence of data analysis on microdosimetric results in clinical beams.

  • Definition of a standard microdosimetric procedure for clinical applications.

  • How to linearly extrapolate microdosimetric spectra to allow data intercomparison.

Abstract

Research on the applications of microdosimetry to particle therapy is spreading worldwide with a rapid increase of publications in the last years. In order to be able to perform an intercomparison of data acquired with different detectors in different clinical centres it is important to analyse data with a standard procedure. Often microdosimetric spectra are presented with different lower detection thresholds, in relation with different detection sensitivity and noise levels. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the influence of the lower detection threshold on the dose-mean lineal energy values, which are used as an assessment of the average LET of the radiation field. Furthermore, the dose distribution of the lineal energy can be used in combination with biological weighting functions to estimate the biological RBE at different positions along the penetration depths of therapeutic proton or carbon ion beams. Microdosimetric spectra cut at different lower thresholds lead in principle to different RBE values. It was an additional purpose of this work to analyse and discuss this effect both for proton and carbon ion irradiations.

Spectra in proton and carbon ion beams gathered with a miniaturized TEPC developed at the Legnaro National Laboratories of the Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNL-INFN) have been used to perform this study.

Linear extrapolation of the microdosimetric spectra to a common value of 0.01 keV/μm significantly reduces the deviations in the mean values due to different lower thresholds. It is advisable to perform this procedure to have uniformity in data analysis and facilitate the intercomparison of data.

Introduction

Microdosimeters measure the stochastic process of energy deposition in a micrometric target aiming to mimic the radiation interaction process in a cell. The stochastic nature of the interaction is likely related to the biological effectiveness of different radiation fields, with densely ionizing radiation more effective than sparsely ionizing radiation, for a given absorbed dose [Rossi, 1966; Durante, 2009].

The interest in microdosimetry for potential application in hadron therapy, as a tool to measure the radiation quality of complex radiation fields, is growing worldwide, as documented by the increasing number of publications on this topic. Several detectors, both typical Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counters (TEPCs) and solid-state microdosimeters are currently being used to study the radiation quality of different clinical centres [Conte et al., 2020]. In order to make the intercomparison of results between each other and with meaningful simulated data, it is important to set a standard procedure for data analysis.

In particular, the dose-mean lineal energy, yD,is defined in the ICRU Report 36 [Booz J., 1983] as the mean value of the dose distribution d(y) of the lineal energy over the whole range of lineal energy values. However, electronic noise and detection system sensitivity pose a limit on the lowest detectable signal, the signal that can be detected over the background electronic noise of the detection system. The main source of noise is the preamplifier, with typical noise levels of 500 electrons RMS. The minimum detectable signal εm (or Lower Level Discriminator (LLD)) should be set to about 5 times the RMS noise to avoid the conversion of background noise pulses and freezing of the acquisition system [H. Rossi and M. Zaider, 1996; D. Srdoc, 1970]:εmin=5ermsWGwhere W is the average energy required to produce an ion pair (electron-hole pair in case of solid state detectors), approximately 10/3.6/28 eV for diamond/silicon/propane gas respectively, and G is the amplification factor of the detector, which is 1 for solid state detectors and about 500 for gas proportional counter. When this rule is followed most of the noise is suppressed with 1 count per second as counting rate for the background noise. According to equation (1) and with erms = 500, the minimum detectable energy in diamond and silicon microdosimeters results to be εmin=25keV and εmin=9keV respectively. In terms of lineal energy, these εmin values correspond to ymin=εmin/l, being l the mean chord length of the sensitive volume. Therefore, for a given RMS noise, the actual value ymin decreases with increasing simulated site size. For instance, if l=10μm one gets ymin=2.5keV/μm and ymin=0.9keV/μm ion correspondence of the previous values of εmin.

For a spherical TEPC simulating a water site of 1 μm, having a typical gas gain G = 500, the minimum detectable energy is εm=0.14keV and the minimum lineal energy is ymin=0.21keV/μm.

To minimize the dependency on the lower detection threshold of the average lineal energy values, the lineal energy distributions can be linearly extrapolated down to a common threshold of 0.01 keV/μm, corresponding to the ionization threshold of 10 eV in water. This extrapolation procedure is described in [Lindborg and Waker, 2017], [Lindborg, 1975] [Beck and Appendix, 2004] and it has been normally applied in other publications of the mini-TEPCs [Conte et al., 2020] [Bianchi et al., 2020] together with a discussion on the uncertainties related to this procedure [Moro, 2003a] [Moro, 2003b]. However, this extrapolation procedure is not applied often by experimental groups (see for example Missiaggia et al., 2020; Verona et al., 2020; Debrot et al., 2018), leading to a heterogeneity of results that strongly depend on the electronic noise level during the irradiation and on the specific detector sensitivity. When the lineal energy mean values are calculated from microdosimetric distributions that are cut above the lowest detectable signal without performing the extrapolation to 0.01 keV/μm, the low lineal energy fraction of the microdosimetric spectrum is completely neglected resulting in artificially higher values of the calculated mean values. The yd(y) distributions measured with thick silicon detectors or with diamond microdosimeters, often show a cut at about 1 keV/μm (see for example Debrot et al., 2018; Verona et al., 2020). The lowest detectable signal, in terms of lineal energy, for thin silicon devices can be up to 10 times higher [Agosteo et al., 2010].

In this work, we studied the influence of the lower detection threshold on the calculated dose-mean lineal energy values and also on the assessment of the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for clonogenic survival of asynchronized normoxic V79 cells, calculated with a new Biological Weighting Function by [Parisi, 2020]. The analysis was performed on microdosimetric spectra measured in protons and carbon ion beams with a miniaturized TEPC.

Section snippets

The detector: mini-TEPC

The mini-TEPC which was employed in the measurement campaign at the Centre for Hadron Therapy and Advanced Nuclear Applications (CATANA, Catania, Italy) beam line has been developed at the LNL-INFN and is an upgrade of the version described in [De Nardo et al., 2004] that measured at National Centre for Oncological Hadron therapy (CNAO, Pavia, Italy). This mini-TEPC was modified in order to work without gas flow [Conte et al., 2019] and for this reason all the gas ducts have been enlarged and

Results and discussion

In Fig. 3 the yd(y) spectral distributions of the mini-TEPC in the proton beam (left panel) and carbon ion beam (right panel) are shown after the linear extrapolation down to 0.01 keV/μm.

It is clear from Fig. 3 that in the case of the proton beam the most critical spectrum, with respect to the lowest threshold, is the one measured at the smallest depth of 1.4 mm, when the 62 MeV protons deliver a significant fraction of dose through low lineal energy events. In contrast, for carbon ions the

Conclusions

Measurements are always affected by electronic noise that determines the minimum detectable signal. In microdosimetry with solid state detectors, for instance, a lower detection threshold at y = 1 keV/μm is frequently reported, while with tissue equivalent proportional counters the lower threshold can be smaller, thanks to the amplification of the gas avalanche. When comparing the mean values of the lineal energy distributions, care should be taken for the lower detection threshold, because

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the 5th Scientific Commission of the Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK CEN and Hasselt University. This work has been partially supported by the ENEN + project that has received funding from the EURATOM research and training Work Programme 2016–2017 – 1 #755576.

References (22)

  • L. De Nardo

    Mini-TEPCs for radiation therapy

    Radiat. Protect. Dosim.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Microdosimetry of an accelerator based thermal neutron field for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy

      2022, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
      Citation Excerpt :

      The lineal energy calibration of the measured distributions was performed at the electron-edge, assigning to it the value of 10.8 keV/μm (Bianchi et al., 2021a). A detection threshold of about 0.3 keV/μm was registered due to environmental noise conditions, but all the frequency distributions of the lineal energy, f(y), were linearly extrapolated down to 0.01 keV/μm (Bianchi et al., 2021b). For indirectly ionizing radiation, like photons and neutrons, the energy deposition in the SV takes place through secondary charged particles produced in the A-150 cathode, while the probability of secondary production in the filling gas is negligible.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text