Skip to main content
Log in

Forgiving the Unforgivable: The Possibility of the ‘Unconditional’ Forgiveness in the Workplace

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forgiveness has been a central issue for humankind since ancient times; it emerged in theology, but in recent decades it has received significant attention from different disciplines, such as philosophy and psychology. More recently, forgiveness has received attention also from organizational and managerial studies, particularly, in studying how individuals respond to interpersonal offenses, or perceived harm and wrongdoing in the workplace. Forgiveness is a complex concept, as it can be understood as a family of related constructs and can be analyzed at different levels. Even if social sciences have widely recognized that the nature of forgiveness can be both conditional and unconditional, the notions of conditionality and unconditionality have not yet received sufficient study, especially in organizational and managerial fields. In these fields, forgiveness has been predominantly studied under a psychological approach, looking for the conditions under which it may occur in the workplace. Unconditional forgiveness has received less attention: with a few exceptions, managerial and organizational literature has limited the conceptualization of forgiveness, weakening its scope and probably not catching a relevant part of forgiving experiences in the workplace. This article proposes to follow a more comprehensive approach to forgiveness in the workplace, according to the social sciences field, which can take into account both conditionality and unconditionality. It focuses on unconditional forgiveness according to Continental philosophy, in particular, to the thought of Jacque Derrida and Paul Ricoeur. Through their contributions, the unconditionality of forgiveness is deepened, and the implications of considering both conditional and unconditional forgiveness are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. S., Zou, X., Inesi, M. E., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Forgiveness is not always divine: When expressing forgiveness makes others avoid you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2000). Forgiveness in context. Journal of Moral Education, 29(1), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandona, A. (2015). Humility in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baviera, T., English, W., & Guillén, M. (2016). The ‘Logic of Gift’: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Barclay, L. J., Tripp, T. M., & Aquino, K. (2016). A systems perspective on forgiveness in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 245–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246–260). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S., & Messersmith, A. S. (2012). Organizational and supervisory apology effectiveness: Apology giving in work settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management, 25(5), 607–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. S., & Exline, J. J. (2011). Forgiveness at four levels: Intrapersonal, relational, organizational, and collective-group. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 244–259). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., & Dixon, R. D. (2010). Love, forgiveness, and trust: Critical values of the modern leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2002). Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, B. (2003). Breaking the silence on white collar crime. Risk Management, 50(9), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. S. (2011). A forgiving workplace: An investigation of forgiveness climate and workplace outcomes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1–6.

  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidhizar, R. E., & Laurent, C. R. (2000). The art of forgiveness. Hospital Materiel Management Quarterly, 21(3), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2000). On forgiveness. Studies in Practical Philosophy, 2(2), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2001a). On Forgiveness. In J. Derrida (Ed.), On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness (pp. 27–58). Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J. (2001b), To forgive: The unforgivable and the imprescriptible. In J. D. Caputo, M. Scanlon, & Dolley, M. (Eds.), Questioning God (pp. 21–51). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  • Dodlova, M., & Yudkevich, M. (2009). Gift exchange in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D. (1994). Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness: Identity or reciprocity? Human Development, 37(2), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 21(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 894–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hill, P., & MeCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faldetta, G. (2011). The logic of gift and gratuitousness in business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(S1), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, R. (2011). The forgiving organization: Building and benefiting from a culture of forgiveness. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1–6.

  • Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). The forgiving organization: A multilevel model of forgiveness at work. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 664–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta–analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 894–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiasse, G. (2018). Forgiveness in Ricoeur. In M. La Caze (Ed.), Phenomenology and forgiveness (pp. 85–102). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 956–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons, R. P. (1986). The cognitive and emotive uses of forgiveness in the treatment of anger. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 23(4), 629–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Baron, R. A. (1996). Violence and hostility at work: A model of reactions to perceived injustice. In G. R. Vandenbos & E. Q. Bulato (Eds.), Workplace violence (pp. 51–85). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2011). ‘No strings attached’: Welcoming the existential gift in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, E., & McNaughton, D. (2003). In defence of unconditional forgiveness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., & Aquino, K. (2010). And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 624–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (1999). Forgiveness and the unforgivable. American Philosophical Quarterly, 36(1), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (1990). Spotlight abuse–save profits. Industrial Distribution, 79(3), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, J., & Enright, R. D. (1993). Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 30(4), 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & B. Weiner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125–143). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. M., & Warmke, B. (2017). Forgiveness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/forgiveness/.

  • Karremans, J. C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2008). Forgiveness in personal relationships: Its malleability and powerful consequences. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1), 202–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence–versus integrity–based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T., Shapiro, D. L., Aquino, K., Lim, V. K. G., & Bennett, R. J. (2008). Workplace offense and victims’ reactions: The effects of victim–offender (dis)similarity, offense–type, and cultural differences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(3), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzynski, M. J. (1998). The virtue of forgiveness as a human resource management strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Caze, M. (2006). The asymmetry between apology and forgiveness. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(4), 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leunissen, J. M., De Cremer, D., & Folmer, C. P. R. (2012). An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining: The importance of forgiveness to apologize. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, L. M., Simmons, B. L., & Nelson, D. L. (2007). Health among leadership: Positive and negative affect, engagement and burnout, forgiveness and revenge. The Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S. R., Gygi, J., Hammond, S. C., & Plowman, S. F. (2009). Forgiveness as a workplace intervention: The literature and a proposed framework. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 10(2), 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler, L. E., Cox, S. S., Simmering, M. J., Bennett, R. J., & Fuller, J. B. (2011). Exploring the role of touch and apologies in forgiveness of workplace offenses. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23(2), 144–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1950). Sociologie et anthropologie. Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression–related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, J., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(2), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., & O’Hair, H. D. (1983). The management of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior. Human Communication Research, 9(3), 208–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2011). Forgiveness: A cognitive-motivational anatomy. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 41(3), 260–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignonac, K., & Richebé, N. (2013). ‘No strings attached?’: How attribution of disinterested support affects employee retention. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(1), 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukashema, I., & Mullet, E. (2013). Unconditional forgiveness, reconciliation sentiment, and mental health among victims of genocide in Rwanda. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization–motivated aggression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 225–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2014). Bridging diverging perspectives and repairing damaged relationships in the aftermath of workplace transgressions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 443–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Hedrick, K. (2012). Refusing to apologize can have psychological benefits (and we issue no mea culpa for this research finding). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. (2011). Moral decision-making. In M. Painter-Morland & R. ten Bos (Eds.), Business ethics and continental philosophy (pp. 117–140). Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E. (2012). Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi–level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastephanou, M. (2003). Forgiving and requesting forgiveness. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(3), 503–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Ursúa, M., Jódar, R., Gismero-Gonzalez, E., Carrasco, M. J., Martínez, M. P., & Cagigal, V. (2018). Conditional or unconditional forgiveness? An instrument to measure the conditionality of forgiveness. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 28(3), 206–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reb, J., Goldman, B. M., Kray, L. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2006). Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H., & Gray, B. (2009). Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. I., Ali, M. A., Beck, G. L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., Narayanan, V., & Williams, J. G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17–40). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie, E. D., & Scobie, G. E. W. (1998). Damaging events: The perceived need for forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 28(4), 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sells, J. N., & Hargrave, T. D. (1998). Forgiveness: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Family Therapy, 20(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. C., Wild, E., & Colquitt, J. A. (2003). To justify or excuse? A meta–analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 444–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. (Eds.). (2018). Business ethics: A virtue ethics and common good approach. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Gee, J. (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 322–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (2002). Forgiveness in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34(7), 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struthers, C. W., Dupuis, R., & Eaton, J. (2005). Promoting forgiveness among co–workers following a workplace transgression: The effects of social motivation training. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37(4), 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B., & Simkins, T. J. (2017). Self-oriented forgiveness and other-oriented forgiveness: Shaping high-quality exchange relationships. Journal of Management and Organization, 23(5), 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30(2), 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, L. L., & Friedman, P. (2009). Forgiveness, gratitude, and well-being: The mediating role of affect and beliefs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, T. M., Bies, R. J., & Aquino, K. (2007). A vigilante model of justice: Revenge, reconciliation, forgiveness, and avoidance. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 10–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsarenko, Y., & Rooslani Tojib, D. (2011). A transactional model of forgiveness in the service failure context: A customer–driven approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 25(5), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M. S. (1989). Crime victims seeking fairness, not revenge: Toward restorative justice. Federal Probation, 53(3), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdeja, E. (2004). Derrida and the impossibility of forgiveness. Contemporary Political Theory, 3(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. M., Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness: Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, M. X., & van Dijke, M. (2020). Expressing forgiveness after interpersonal mistreatment: Power and status of forgivers influence transgressors’ relationship restoration efforts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(8), 782–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Van Dijke, M., Leunissen, J. M., Giurge, L. M., & De Cremer, D. (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69(6), 1387–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, L., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017). Reciprocity and gift–giving logic in NPOs. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(7), 513–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guglielmo Faldetta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faldetta, G. Forgiving the Unforgivable: The Possibility of the ‘Unconditional’ Forgiveness in the Workplace. J Bus Ethics 180, 91–103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04885-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04885-2

Keywords

Navigation