On learning that could have happened: The same tale in two cities
Section snippets
The context: From MAP and SELP investigations to the Déjà vu study
In this section, a brief description of MAP and SELP is followed by a presentation of those of their data that have been considered in the Déjà vu study.
Conceptualization: How to compare learning interactions?
Any two cases of learning interaction may appear similar or different in multiple ways. In this section, we introduce the construct of participation profile with which to encapsulate those characteristics of students’ actions and of their dyadic interactions that may impact the effectiveness of the dyadic learning. Since learning-shaping features are those that researchers are usually looking for, they were likely to be the ones that the second author attended to and that produced her sense of
Questions to guide the Déjà vu study
The first step in our analyses will be to answer the following question:
Q1: What was common to the participation structures of the MAP and SELP episodes?
While answering Q1, we hope to capture those public, but difficult to see aspects of the MAP and SELP events that could be held responsible for the second author’s sense of their striking similarity of the two cases. In addition, it will give us an unconventional look at opportunities for learning that arose in the participants’ interactions.
Method of analysis
In operationalizing the constructs of individual participation profile and of dyadic participation structure we drew on MAP’s conceptualization and methods of analysis, which we were now able to refine thanks to our additional, quarter-century worth of experience in commognitive research.
As a preparation to data analysis, an interaction diagram was to be built to visually represent the interactions in each episode. This kind of diagram, a case-specific elaboration of Fig. 4, was to be a more
Method of analysis
Opportunities for learning faced by a student in the course of dyadic interactions depend on the part she or he plays in mathematizing. Any given situation may constitute a learning opportunity for one partner, but not for the other; or it may be an opportunity for a different type of learning for each one of them. We will thus conduct our analyzes with the help of the notion of role in mathematizing, the construct that captures those aspects of persons participation that shape different
Method of analysis
The Vygotskian conviction that interacting with “a more capable peer” is particularly conducive to learning rests on the tacit assumption that those with a better command of the discourse will implement their role of leaders-in-mathematizing in full, and this means, among others, that they will take responsibility for the partner’s learning. Similarly, those in the role of followers are expected to act in such a way as to make the other student’s discourse genuinely their own. Thus, in the
Summary and discussion: Why do student miss opportunities to learn from a “more capable” peer?
To summarize the above responses to our three research questions, all the interactions considered in this study revealed the same participation structure, with one participant leading-in-mathematizing, but following-in-inter-personal-communication, and with his or her partner playing the complementary roles. This participation structure provided the followers-in-mathematizing with many learning opportunities. Many factors may be responsible for the fact that the students did not benefit as much
A glance from above: The contribution of the Déjà vu study to research on learning-in-peer-interactions
As stated in the introduction to this article, we hoped that the Déjà vu study would further our understanding of learning-in-peer-interactions, while also showing generalizability, thus usefulness, of theory-guided case studies. We conclude this article with reflection on the question of whether, and to what extent, these expectations have been fulfilled.
The query about an innovative contribution is particularly pertinent in the view of the fact that much of what has been done in the Déjà vu
Note
The authors dedicate this paper to the memory of David Clarke, the leader of the Social Essentials of Learning project (SELP).
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interests with any institution or individual.
Acknowledgements
The Social Essentials of Learning project (SELP) was supported under the Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme [Project number DP170102541]. We would like to thank the students, parents, teachers, and school staff for their invaluable support of the project.
References (25)
- et al.
Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying
International Journal of Educational Research
(2012) - et al.
Complementary lenses: Using theories of situativity and complexity to understand collaborative learning as systems-level social activity
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
(2016) - et al.
The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory
Journal of Educational Psychology
(2007) "She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one": Identities in mathematics classroom
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
(2012)- et al.
Video-based research in a laboratory classroom
- et al.
Positioning During Group Work on a Novel Task in Algebra II
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
(2015) - et al.
Opportunity to learn
Oxford handbooks online
(2016) Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures
Journal of the Learning Sciences
(2009)Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research
Educational Researcher
(1993)Vicious cycles of identifying and mathematizing: A case study of the development of mathematical failure
Journal of the Learning Sciences
(2015)
Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research
Cambridge Journal of Education
Thinking together and alone
Educational Researcher
Cited by (20)
Classroom interaction in mathematics: learning of mathematics and learning to participate
2022, Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesCitation Excerpt :Therefore, the term commognition was created to describe phenomena that are associated with both the cognition and interpersonal exchanges of individuals. Over the past two decades, some commognitive studies have arisen in mathematics education that focus on how student interactions are connected to mathematics learning performance and/or learning experiences [37••]. The most significant implication of these studies, as suggested by Sfard [4••], is that communication gaps exist in mathematics teaching and learning, and teachers may not realize that obstacles to learning can occur with certain types of instruction.
Supporting college students to communicate productively in groups: A self-awareness intervention
2022, International Journal of Educational Research OpenCitation Excerpt :While dialogic instruction can support student learning and engagement in mathematics (ARC Center, 2003; Boaler & Staples, 2008; Johnson et al., 2000, 2010; Liljedahl, 2016), teachers often find it difficult to manage student collaboration (Franke, Kazemi & Battey, 2007). The problem is that students do not naturally communicate in ways that help them learn in mathematics (e.g., Campbell, 2021; Barron, 2003; Chan & Sfard, 2020; Kotsopoulos, 2010; Sfard & Kieran, 2001); instead, they need to be taught how to communicate (Campbell, 2021; DeJarnette & González, 2015; Gillies, 2002; Johnson & Johnson, 2016; Sfard & Kieran, 2001). Researchers have designed interventions to support students to communicate effectively in mathematics, such as developing group rules (Hofmann & Mercer, 2016; Mercer et al., 1999) and group roles (Boaler, 2006; Esmonde, 2009).
Standing on each other's shoulders: A case of coalescence between geometric discourses in peer interaction
2021, Journal of Mathematical BehaviorCitation Excerpt :However, peer learning often includes learners who are all novices in the new discourse. Commognitive studies suggest that for such cases to be effective, students who are more competent in the new discourse should assume the role of the leader, while students who are less competent in the new discourse should assume the role of the follower (Ben-Zvi & Sfard, 2007; Chan & Sfard, 2020; Sfard & Kieran, 2001). Nevertheless, in some interactions the peers’ level of expertise may be somewhat equal.
Growing research groves to visualize young students’ learning in small groups
2023, Mathematics Education Research JournalFROM LOGICAL CAUSATIONS TO LIKELY CONNECTIONS
2023, For the Learning of Mathematics