The use of cross multiplication and other mal–rules in fraction operations by pre-service teachers
Introduction
It is well recognized that teachers require a deep and connected understanding of the mathematics concepts that they will be teaching. Consequently, issues about mathematics knowledge for teaching has been a focus of much interest in many different countries (Ball, Thames, & Phelps, 2008; Bansilal, Brijlall, & Mkhwanazi, 2014; Beswick, Callingham, & Watson, 2012; Chinnappan & Forrester, 2014; Kar & Isik, 2014; Venkat & Spaull, 2015). The Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (2012), p.23) emphasize that it is not sufficient for “teachers to rely on their past experiences as learners of mathematics” and recommend that mathematics courses for elementary teachers should not only focus on remedying “weaknesses in mathematical knowledge” but should also help teachers develop a deeper understanding of the mathematics they will teach. Mathematics teachers need to be able to explain not only how to compute certain procedures, but why certain procedures make sense in a context, and whether certain procedure result in the same result and why they do so (Lovin, Stevens, Siegfried, Wilkins, & Norton, 2018).
The South African context adds an additional dimension to the concerns articulated about teacher knowledge in mathematics. Since the onset of the democratic era, the higher education sector has expanded rapidly. Statistics shared by the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) showed that in 2013 approximately 984 000 students were enrolled in higher education (South African Institute of Race Relations, 2016), growing from 495 000 in 1994 (Ramrathan, 2016). These numbers show that the sector has almost doubled in the post-apartheid period; this can be seen as a positive development in trying to overturn inequitable apartheid practices. However this rapid growth and large demand for qualified teachers, has meant that many of the students who enter the teaching field are below average students, and may have weak subject content knowledge (Bowie & Reed, 2016; Deacon, 2016; Taylor, 2014). This poor knowledge background of the future teachers, present a challenge to teacher education institutions who must try to break the “cycle of mediocrity, where school leavers, [high school graduates] who were themselves poorly taught are returned to the schools as poorly prepared teachers” (Deacon, 2016, p.25). Studies focusing on mathematics preservice teachers (PST’s) in South Africa confirm that many PST’s do not have a sufficiently strong background in basic mathematics (Bansilal et al., 2014; Bansilal, Brijlall, & Trigueros, 2017; Ndlovu, Amin, & Samuel, 2017). Although there are many studies in South Africa about pre–service and practicing teachers’ poor knowledge, most have been about high school teachers and few have focused on primary school concepts such as fraction operations.
This case study focuses on a group of primary school PST’s enrolled in a 4–year Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) programme at a selected South African university. These students, many of whom struggled with mathematics at school, were enrolled in a foundational primary mathematics course in their first year, after which they could go on to study other primary school subject specializations, which may or may not include mathematics. The purpose of this study is to better understand the misconceptions that the PST’s hold about fraction operations. It is hoped that this study can shed light on the problem of under–prepared PST’s in South Africa and, more generally, provide a deeper insight about particular misconceptions held by PST’s about fraction operations.
Section snippets
Literature review
A misconception is a widely used term to “designate a student conception that produces a systematic pattern of errors” (Smith et al., 2003, p. 119). Sometimes misconceptions arise when certain properties of a concept are valid in a particular setting, and these are wrongly applied to an extended domain where it does not apply (Nesher, 1987; Smith, diSessa, & Roschelle, 1993). For example, in the context of calculating determinants in matrix algebra, it was found (Kazunga & Bansilal, 2018) the
Theoretical framework
An individual’s scheme in a particular situation is an organized way of experiencing and operating in service of a goal (Boyce & Norton, 2016). Vergnaud asserts that most of our cognitive activity is made of schemes which can be seen as an “invariant organization of behavior for a certain class of situations”, while noting that it is not the behavior that is invariant, but the organization of the behavior (1998, p.167). A scheme is a dynamic totality that is applicable to a range of situations,
Methodology
The participants of this study comprised 60 undergraduate full-time students, enrolled for a four–year degree which would enable them to qualify as a primary school teacher. The approach taken is that of a case study since it is a systematic enquiry so as to gain an in-depth description and analysis of a bounded system in order to identify the PST’s misconceptions of fraction operations (Gomm, Hammersley, & Foster, 2011). The participants were enrolled in a foundational course in mathematics
Results
We first present an overview of the results for the two items, which is then followed by a description of the various strategies in terms of theorems–in–action that were identified. Finally we focus on the consistency with which certain mal–rules are applied.
Discussion
The study revealed that the students have interiorized some limited concepts–in– action or misconceptions which they have used to create their own (mal–) rules which direct their approach to the operations on fractions. Table 2 presents a summary of the different theorems–in–action that guided the rules for the fraction operations used by the participants in this study. The equations have been numbered according to how they appear in the results section. Included in the table is the number of
Concluding remarks
This study provides some insights into a range of mal–rules as well as some rules which are legitimate formulations of fraction operations but are implemented with a flawed conceptual basis. The conflation of cross multiplication with the multiplication operation was quite widespread, with some students applying cross multiplication in other fraction operations. Although many studies have focused on misconceptions about fractions, the analytic approach of exploring these mal–rules in a more
Author statement
The author declare that the manuscript reports on original work and the manuscript is not currently under review for any other publication.
The author declare that the work described has not been published previously, it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other
References (45)
- et al.
An APOS study on pre-service teachers’ understanding of injections and surjections
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
(2017) - et al.
Co-construction of fractions schemes and units coordinating structures
The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
(2016) - et al.
Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2013) - et al.
The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions
Learning and Instruction
(2004) - et al.
What do we know about primary teachers’ mathematical content knowledge in South Africa? An analysis of SACMEQ 2007
International Journal of Educational Development
(2015) - et al.
Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
Journal of Teacher Education
(2008) The application of the percentage change calculation in the context of inflation in Mathematical Literacy
Pythagoras
(2017)- et al.
An exploration of the common content knowledge of high school math teachers
Perspectives in Education
(2014) - et al.
Ratio and proportion. Research and teaching in mathematics teachers’ education (Pre- and in-service mathematics teachers of elementary and middle school classes)
(2012) - et al.
The nature and development of middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
(2012)
Analyzing and modelling arithmetic errors
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
How much of what? An analysis of the espoused and enacted mathematics and English curricula for intermediate phase student teachers at five South African universities
Perspectives in Education
Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers
Mathematics Education Research Journal
The mathematical education of teachers II
Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
The initial teacher education project: Final report
The predominance of procedural knowledge in fractions
Case study methods
Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Ratio: Children’s strategies and errors. A report of the strategies and errors in secondary mathematics project
Analysis of problems posed by pre-service primary teachers about adding fractions in terms of semiotic structures
Journal on Mathematics Education
Teachers’ approaches to proportional relationship problems in multiple measure spaces
African Journal for Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
Cited by (4)
Student Teachers' Conceptions of Fractions: A Framework for the Analysis of Different Aspects of Fractions
2024, Mathematics Teacher Education and DevelopmentThe structural and operational complementarity: Grade nine learners' pitfalls and gains of simplifying algebraic expressions
2023, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology EducationDevelopment of an App and Videos to Support the Fraction Learning Trajectory from Grades 1-7
2022, 30th International Conference on Computers in Education Conference, ICCE 2022 - ProceedingsA case study of in-service teachers’ errors and misconceptions in linear combinations
2022, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology