The use of cross multiplication and other mal–rules in fraction operations by pre-service teachers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100781Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study reports on mal–rules (mainly related to cross-multiplication) used by PST’s in fraction operations..

  • The interviews revealed the PST’s strong conviction of whole number operations applied separately to parts of the fraction.

  • The use of theorems-in-action provides useful insights into the rules as well as properties about some of the rules.

Abstract

Many studies show that prospective teachers often have misconceptions about fractions. In this case study, we report on some of the mal–rules used by a group of 60 prospective South African primary school teachers. The students’ written responses to two items focusing on addition and multiplication of fractions which formed part of an assessment, were analyzed. Semi-structured interviews were also used to elicit the reasoning used in the students’ calculations. Less than half of the participants completed both items correctly, and many of the other students displayed various mal–rules. To interpret the pre–service teachers’ misconceptions, we studied the rules used by the participants, and expressed them as theorems–in–action. An interesting mal–rule governing the multiplication of fractions was the widespread ‘cross multiplication’ rule which after some mutations led to other mal–rules, illustrating how students’ misconceptions can persist many years after their initial learning.

Introduction

It is well recognized that teachers require a deep and connected understanding of the mathematics concepts that they will be teaching. Consequently, issues about mathematics knowledge for teaching has been a focus of much interest in many different countries (Ball, Thames, & Phelps, 2008; Bansilal, Brijlall, & Mkhwanazi, 2014; Beswick, Callingham, & Watson, 2012; Chinnappan & Forrester, 2014; Kar & Isik, 2014; Venkat & Spaull, 2015). The Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (2012), p.23) emphasize that it is not sufficient for “teachers to rely on their past experiences as learners of mathematics” and recommend that mathematics courses for elementary teachers should not only focus on remedying “weaknesses in mathematical knowledge” but should also help teachers develop a deeper understanding of the mathematics they will teach. Mathematics teachers need to be able to explain not only how to compute certain procedures, but why certain procedures make sense in a context, and whether certain procedure result in the same result and why they do so (Lovin, Stevens, Siegfried, Wilkins, & Norton, 2018).

The South African context adds an additional dimension to the concerns articulated about teacher knowledge in mathematics. Since the onset of the democratic era, the higher education sector has expanded rapidly. Statistics shared by the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) showed that in 2013 approximately 984 000 students were enrolled in higher education (South African Institute of Race Relations, 2016), growing from 495 000 in 1994 (Ramrathan, 2016). These numbers show that the sector has almost doubled in the post-apartheid period; this can be seen as a positive development in trying to overturn inequitable apartheid practices. However this rapid growth and large demand for qualified teachers, has meant that many of the students who enter the teaching field are below average students, and may have weak subject content knowledge (Bowie & Reed, 2016; Deacon, 2016; Taylor, 2014). This poor knowledge background of the future teachers, present a challenge to teacher education institutions who must try to break the “cycle of mediocrity, where school leavers, [high school graduates] who were themselves poorly taught are returned to the schools as poorly prepared teachers” (Deacon, 2016, p.25). Studies focusing on mathematics preservice teachers (PST’s) in South Africa confirm that many PST’s do not have a sufficiently strong background in basic mathematics (Bansilal et al., 2014; Bansilal, Brijlall, & Trigueros, 2017; Ndlovu, Amin, & Samuel, 2017). Although there are many studies in South Africa about pre–service and practicing teachers’ poor knowledge, most have been about high school teachers and few have focused on primary school concepts such as fraction operations.

This case study focuses on a group of primary school PST’s enrolled in a 4–year Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) programme at a selected South African university. These students, many of whom struggled with mathematics at school, were enrolled in a foundational primary mathematics course in their first year, after which they could go on to study other primary school subject specializations, which may or may not include mathematics. The purpose of this study is to better understand the misconceptions that the PST’s hold about fraction operations. It is hoped that this study can shed light on the problem of under–prepared PST’s in South Africa and, more generally, provide a deeper insight about particular misconceptions held by PST’s about fraction operations.

Section snippets

Literature review

A misconception is a widely used term to “designate a student conception that produces a systematic pattern of errors” (Smith et al., 2003, p. 119). Sometimes misconceptions arise when certain properties of a concept are valid in a particular setting, and these are wrongly applied to an extended domain where it does not apply (Nesher, 1987; Smith, diSessa, & Roschelle, 1993). For example, in the context of calculating determinants in matrix algebra, it was found (Kazunga & Bansilal, 2018) the

Theoretical framework

An individual’s scheme in a particular situation is an organized way of experiencing and operating in service of a goal (Boyce & Norton, 2016). Vergnaud asserts that most of our cognitive activity is made of schemes which can be seen as an “invariant organization of behavior for a certain class of situations”, while noting that it is not the behavior that is invariant, but the organization of the behavior (1998, p.167). A scheme is a dynamic totality that is applicable to a range of situations,

Methodology

The participants of this study comprised 60 undergraduate full-time students, enrolled for a four–year degree which would enable them to qualify as a primary school teacher. The approach taken is that of a case study since it is a systematic enquiry so as to gain an in-depth description and analysis of a bounded system in order to identify the PST’s misconceptions of fraction operations (Gomm, Hammersley, & Foster, 2011). The participants were enrolled in a foundational course in mathematics

Results

We first present an overview of the results for the two items, which is then followed by a description of the various strategies in terms of theorems–in–action that were identified. Finally we focus on the consistency with which certain mal–rules are applied.

Discussion

The study revealed that the students have interiorized some limited concepts–in– action or misconceptions which they have used to create their own (mal–) rules which direct their approach to the operations on fractions. Table 2 presents a summary of the different theorems–in–action that guided the rules for the fraction operations used by the participants in this study. The equations have been numbered according to how they appear in the results section. Included in the table is the number of

Concluding remarks

This study provides some insights into a range of mal–rules as well as some rules which are legitimate formulations of fraction operations but are implemented with a flawed conceptual basis. The conflation of cross multiplication with the multiplication operation was quite widespread, with some students applying cross multiplication in other fraction operations. Although many studies have focused on misconceptions about fractions, the analytic approach of exploring these mal–rules in a more

Author statement

The author declare that the manuscript reports on original work and the manuscript is not currently under review for any other publication.

The author declare that the work described has not been published previously, it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other

References (45)

  • J.A. Blando et al.

    Analyzing and modelling arithmetic errors

    Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

    (1989)
  • L. Bowie et al.

    How much of what? An analysis of the espoused and enacted mathematics and English curricula for intermediate phase student teachers at five South African universities

    Perspectives in Education

    (2016)
  • M. Chinnappan et al.

    Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers

    Mathematics Education Research Journal

    (2014)
  • Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences

    The mathematical education of teachers II

    (2012)
  • K.A. Cramer et al.

    Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum

    Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

    (2002)
  • R. Deacon

    The initial teacher education project: Final report

    (2016)
  • P.A. Forrester et al.

    The predominance of procedural knowledge in fractions

  • R. Gomm et al.

    Case study methods

    (2011)
  • A.J. Hackenberg et al.

    Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing

    Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

    (2015)
  • K.M. Hart

    Ratio: Children’s strategies and errors. A report of the strategies and errors in secondary mathematics project

    (1984)
  • T. Kar et al.

    Analysis of problems posed by pre-service primary teachers about adding fractions in terms of semiotic structures

    Journal on Mathematics Education

    (2014)
  • C. Kazunga et al.

    Teachers’ approaches to proportional relationship problems in multiple measure spaces

    African Journal for Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

    (2016)
  • Cited by (4)

    View full text