Brexit may compromise diet-related health in the United Kingdom — but the risks could be mitigated with trade agreements, subsidy reform and nutrition policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Friel, S. et al. Obes. Rev. 14, 120–134 (2013).
Friel, S., Hattersley, L. & Townsend, R. Annu. Rev. Public Health 36, 325–344 (2015).
Schram, A. et al. Health Policy Plan. 33, 123–136 (2018).
Friel, S. et al. Glob. Health 9, 46 (2013).
Miljkovic, D., de Miranda, S. H. G., Kassouf, A. L. & Oliveira, F. C. R. Appl. Econ. 50, 3076–3088 (2018).
Freund, F. & Springmann, M. Nat. Food https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00306-9 (2021).
Hawkes, C. Enhancing Coherence between Trade Policy and Nutrition Action: Implementing the Framework for Action of the Second International Conference on Nutrition (United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition, 2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthews, A. Trade agreements have health consequences. Nat Food 2, 458 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00308-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00308-7
