Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated Farming System Model for Sustained Farm Income and Employment Generation Under Rainfed Vertisol of Southern Zone of Tamil Nadu

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
National Academy Science Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study on integrated farming system (IFS) was conducted during 2011–2017 at Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti, to find out economic viability of IFS model by changing in crop(s) or cropping system and integrating different livestock enterprises. The IFS model consisted of five crops or cropping systems, viz. sorghum (K-8) + cowpea (Co-7) (1:1) (0.40 ha), maize [CoH (m)-6] + greengram (Co-6) (1:1) (0.15 ha), cotton (KC-3) + blackgram (UBN-6) (1:1) (0.60 ha), clusterbean (local variety) (0.15), fodder crops [sorghum (COFS 29), Deshmanthus (local variety)] (0.30 ha) with dairy (1 cow + 1 calf of Sindi breed) and goatery (10 does + 1 buck of kanni breed) components in 1.60 ha total area. The results indicated that the IFS model is good enough to provide sustained average net income of ` 137,712/ha and employment of 389 man days/year as compared to conventional cropping systems (CCS) which gave average negative net income of ` 644/ha during 6 years of investigation due to deficit of rainfall. Thus, it is concluded that farm productivity and profitability as well as employment generation could be sustained by integrating different enterprises, i.e. dairy and goatery along with modified cropping systems in Southern Zone of Tamil Nadu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. CRIDA (2011) Vision 2030. Hyderabad, India, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sasikala V, Tiwari R, Saravanan M (2015) A review on Integrated farming systems. J Int Acad Res Multidiscip 3(7):319–328

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jayanthi C, Mythili S, Balusamy M, Sathivel N, Sankaran N (2003) Integrated nutrient management through residue recycling in low land farming system. Madras Agric J 90(1–3):103–107

    Google Scholar 

  4. AICRPDA (2007) Annual Report. Kovilpatti main centre, All India Coordinate Research Project on Drylands, p 132

    Google Scholar 

  5. Panwar AS, Ravisankar N, Shamim M, Prusty AK (2018) Integrated farming systems: a viable option for doubling farm income of small and marginal farmers. Bull Indian Soc Soil Sci 32:68–88

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy MD (2005) Predominant farming systems and alternatives in Andhra Pradesh. Alternative Farming systems In: Singh, AM, Gangwar, B, Sharma, SK (Eds.) Farming Systems Research and Development Association, Modipuram, pp. 217–227

  7. TAR-IVLP, (2003) Technology Assessment and Refinement through InstituteVillage Linkage Program in Eastern Dry Zone in Karnataka. IIHR, Bangalore, Karnataka, pp 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rangasamy A, Venkitasamy R, Jayanthi C, Purshothaman S, Palaniappan SP (1995) Rice-based farming system: a viable approach. Indian Farming 44(11):27–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Radhamani S (2001) Sustainable integrated farming system for dryland Vertisol of Western Zone of Tamil Nadu, Ph.D. (diss) Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

  10. Devendra C (1999) Goats: challenges for increased productivity and improved livelihoods. Outlookon Agric 28:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Director, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India, and Vice Chancellor, TNAU, Coimbatore, for providing all the facilities and financial support for this study and the support for conducting field study and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Elamathi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Significance Statement: Rainfed farming constitute 58% of net sown area contributes 44% of total food grain production, which supports 40% of human and 66% of livestock population. However, abnormal behaviour of rains with resource degradation and poor resource base of farmers in these areas are the main causes for low and unstable crop yields. IFS approach is good enough to provide sustained net income of ` 137712/ha with employment of 389 man days/year as compared to popular crops or cropping systems in Southern Zone of Tamil Nadu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elamathi, S., Singh, S., Rangaraj, T. et al. Integrated Farming System Model for Sustained Farm Income and Employment Generation Under Rainfed Vertisol of Southern Zone of Tamil Nadu. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 44, 485–487 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-021-01059-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-021-01059-6

Keywords

Navigation