Abstract
We investigated the optimal surface structure of an n-type Si substrate for Si-Al bonding (which prevents high-energy barrier formation) using simulation by the phase field method. The surface structure of the substrate contained a groove to suppress regrowth layer formation at the bottom of the groove. We determined the appropriate width and depth of the groove to effectively suppress the regrowth layer. The features of the regrowth layer suppression mechanism were clarified as the following: narrowing the groove caused the Al concentration to increase inside the groove and, in turn, decreased the degree of supercooling of the Si-Al liquid. However, when the groove was too narrow, the radius of curvature at the bottom of the groove decreased, and the equilibrium melting point of the Si-Al liquid rose due to the Gibbs–Thomson effect. On the other hand, the narrow groove increased the Al concentration, leading to decrease of the equilibrium melting point of the Si-Al liquid. This implies that there is always an optimum value for the width and the depth of the groove by which the regrowth layer is effectively suppressed through forming the groove in the Si surface for the Si-Al bonding process. Any groove morphology with the growth ratio (the ratio of the regrowth layer at the bottom to that at the top of the groove) less than 0.3 is appropriate to achieve good ohmic contact; however, it is considered that the groove with periodic length of 9.4 μm and aspect ratio around 0.2 is the best because of the ease of manufacturing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S.L. Matlow, and E.L. Ralph, J. Appl. Phys. 30, 541 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702400.
F.M. Roberts, and E.L.G. Willkinson, J. Mater. Sci. 6, 189 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00550012.
J. Onuki, M. Suwa, and K. Soeno, J. Jpn. Inst. Metals 42, 1029 (1978). https://doi.org/10.2320/jinstmet1952.42.11_1029.
M. Ghosh, S. Pitale, S.G. Singh, H. Manasawala, V. Karki, M. Singh, K. Singh, G.D. Patra, and S. Sen, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 121, 105350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105350.
T. Lin, J.-N. Xie, S.-H. Ning, Q.-M. Li, and B. Li, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 124, 105622 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105622.
Y. Wu, L. Jia, Z. Lina, M. Hong, S. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Curr. Appl. Phys. 19, 521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2019.02.008.
L. Huang, M. Xia, and X. Gu, J. Cryst. Growth 531, 125353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125353.
D.J. Perello, S.H. Chae, S. Song, and Y.H. Lee, Nat. Commun. 6, 7809 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8809.
B. Liu, H. Xie, D. Niu, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, and Y. Gao, Results Phys. 18, 103222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103222.
N. Provatas, and K. Elder, Phase-Field Methods in Materials Science and Engineering (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527631520.
S.B. Biner, Programming Phase-Field Modeling (Berlin: Springer, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41196-5.
A.A. Wheeler, W.J. Boettinger, and G.B. McFadden, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7424 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.7424.
J.A. Warren, and W.J. Boettinger, Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 689 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(94)00285-P.
J.F. MacCarthy, Acta Mater. 45, 4077 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00082-7.
Y. Saito, Statistical Physics of Crystal Growth, World Scientific, p. 104 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1142/3261.
D. Hofmann, M. Bickermann, R. Eckstein, M. Kolbl, St. G. Muller, E. Schmitt, A. Weber and A. Winnacker, J. Crystal Growth 198–199, 1005 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(98)01212-3.
T. Kimoto, A. Ito, and H. Matsunami, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3494 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.365048.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere thanks to Mr. M. Endoh for stimulating discussions, Mr. K. Shinotsuka for assistance in the simulation, and Dr. Y. Zare for critical reading of the manuscript.
Funding
This research is financially supported by the Light Metal Educational Foundation, Inc. under the funds for Encouragement and Promotion of Research, Study and Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwata, K., Yuchi, R., Sasajima, Y. et al. Optimization of the Surface Structure of the Si Substrate for Si-Al Bonding Using Simulation by the Phase Field Method. Journal of Elec Materi 50, 4770–4780 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-08998-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-08998-2