Numerical investigation of heat transfer characteristics between two particles and supercritical water

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105327Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Heat transfer between two particles and supercritical water are studied.

  • Changes in physical properties have no special effect on heat transfer trend.

  • Heat transfer rate is affected by temperature gradient and physical properties.

Abstract

This work takes two particles as an example to study the effect of distance and angle between two particles on the average Nusselt number Nu, average heat transfer rate ηb, local Nusselt number Nuφ, and local heat transfer rate η. It was found that the variation trend of Nu and Nuφ in supercritical water is the same as that in constant property flow, thus indicating that the variation trend of heat transfer between particles and fluid in supercritical water is the same as in constant property flow. The change in physical properties of supercritical water does not have any special effect on the variation trend of heat transfer. The heat transfer is mainly affected by the overlap of temperature field and the overlap of flow field. However, the results of ηb and η indicate that the variation trend of heat transfer rate is affected by temperature gradient changes and physical property changes.

Introduction

Energy shortage and environmental pollution are twin problems that need urgent solutions. Using existing resources is particularly important for the development of new energy. Supercritical water (SCW) has gradually been widely used in the development of new energy. There are two aspects in the development of new energy at this stage: nuclear reactors with SCW as working fluid, and conversion of particles in SCW. Both these methods are related to the flow and heat transfer characteristics of SCW. In terms of nuclear energy, convective heat transfer between SCW and tube bundles has always been a particularly important research direction, and several studies have been done in this field. The conversion of particles in SCW has also received extensive attention in recent years, and the surface convective heat transfer characteristics of particles in SCW also constitute a hot topic of research. In the research on convective heat transfer of SCW flowing through the tube bundle, some early works such as Griem [1], Shitsman [2], Bishop et al. [3], and McAdams et al. [4] have developed some classical convective heat transfer correlations between SCW and tube bundle. In recent years, some studies, such as Mokry et al. [5], Gupta et al. [6], Cheng et al. [7], and Chen et al. [8], have also developed new correlations. Debrah et al. [9] used Waata's numerical data [10] to verify the aforementioned correlations. Gu et al. [11], [12], [13] used a 2 × 2 rod bundle to verify the aforementioned correlation by numerical simulation, and they found that Bishop is more in line with it. Supercritical water gasification technology is required for the conversion of particles in SCW [14], [15], [16], [17], and this technology has also received extensive attention in recent years. Supercritical water gasification technology is widely used, such as plastic degradation [18], coal gasification hydrogen production [19], [20], [21], and other areas. Regarding the research on the surface flow characteristics of particles in SCW, Wang et al. studied the effect of particle surface roughness on the drag coefficient [22]. Furthermore, due to the variable physical properties of SCW, Wang et al. studied the drag coefficients of two spherical particles in SCW [23]. Existing research shows that the temperature of particles in the process of SCW conversion is a major factor affecting gasification efficiency [19], [20]. Therefore, many works have also conducted research on this field. Wei studied the heat transfer coefficient on the surface of spherical particles in SCW, and finally developed a new correlation [24]. Wu et al. studied the effect of SCW properties on the surface heat transfer coefficient of spherical particles and fitted the corresponding correlations under different surface enthalpy values [25].

This study focuses on the transformation of particles in SCW. Summarizing the aforementioned studies, it was found that the research of heat transfer between SCW and particles is conducted on a single particle. Due to the drastic changes in physical properties of SCW [26] (see Fig. S1 of the Supplementary material), there are few studies on the heat transfer characteristics between particle clusters and SCW. Particle clusters are widespread in supercritical water fluidized beds (SCWFB); therefore, particle clusters are worth investigating. This study takes two particles as an example to analyze the heat transfer characteristics between the SCW and the two particles. Because SCW is characterized by high temperature and high pressure, the experiment is restrictive. This study adopts a numerical simulation method for research.

Section snippets

Numerical method

For Reynolds number less than 210, the flow field is symmetric and stable [27]. Reynolds number is defined as ReρuD/μ, where ρ is inlet density, u is inlet velocity, D is particle diameter, and μ is inlet viscosity. In this study, the Reynolds number calculated in the flow field region is in the range of 25–200. The computational fluid dynamics software used in this study is OpenFOAM; the calculation domain of this study is shown in Fig. 1. To avoid the boundary blockade effect [28], the

Results and discussion

The interaction of particles in SCW is worth investigating. To explore the effect of variation in physical properties on the heat transfer process, it is necessary to present the simulations of constant property flow. Constant property flow is defined as the flow in which the physical properties do not vary during the flow and heat transfer process under the same working conditions as the SCW. The property of constant property flow is the same as the property of inlet. Influencing factors are

Conclusions

This study explored the heat transfer characteristics of two particles in supercritical water. The difference in heat transfer process between two particles with SCW and with constant property flow is studied. This study takes two particles as the research object, with the angle and distance between the particles as the influencing factors. The average Nusselt number Nu, the average heat transfer rate ηb, the local Nusselt number Nuφ, and the local heat transfer rate η were investigated.

(1)

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [Grant number: 2020YFA0714400]; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant number: 51922086].

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (41)

  • H. Griem

    A new procedure for the prediction of forced convection heat transfer at near- and supercritical pressure

    Heat Mass Transf.

    (1996)
  • M.W. Shitsman

    Heat transfer to supercritical helium, carbon dioxide, and water: analysis of thermodynamic and transport properties and experimental data

    Cryogenics

    (1974)
  • A.A. Bishop et al.

    High Temperature: Supercritical Pressure Water Loop: Part 4: Forced Convection Heat Transfer to Water at Near-Critical Temperatures and Super-Critical Pressures

    (1964)
  • W.H. McAdams et al.

    Heat transfer to superheated steam at high pressures

    Trans. ASME

    (1950)
  • S. Mokry et al.

    Development of a heat-transfer correlation for supercritical water flowing in a vertical bare tube

    IHTC, ASME

    (2010)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Developing empirical heat-transfer correlations for supercritical co2 flowing in vertical bare tubes

    Nucl. Eng. Des.

    (2013)
  • X. Cheng et al.

    A simplified method for heat transfer prediction of supercritical fluids in circular tubes

    Ann. Nucl. Energy

    (2009)
  • W.W. Chen et al.

    A new heat transfer correlation for supercritical water flowing in vertical tubes

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2014)
  • S.K. Debrah et al.

    Assessment of heat transfer correlations in the sub-channels of proposed rod bundle geometry for supercritical water reactor

    Heliyon

    (2019)
  • C.L. Waata, Coupled Neutronics/Thermal-Hydraulics Analysis of a High-Performance Light Water Reactor Fuel Assembly,...
  • H.Y. Gu et al.

    Heat transfer to supercritical water in a 2×2 rod bundle

    Ann. Nucl. Energy

    (2015)
  • H.Y. Gu et al.

    Experimental studies on heat transfer to supercritical water in 2 × 2 rod bundle with two channels

    Nucl. Eng. Des.

    (2015)
  • H.Y. Gu et al.

    Experimental study on heat transfer to supercritical water in 2×2 rod bundle with wire wraps

    Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.

    (2016)
  • L.J. Guo et al.

    Boiling coal in water: hydrogen production and power generation system with zero net CO2 emission based on coal and supercritical water gasification

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2013)
  • H. Jin et al.

    Hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water with a fluidized bed reactor

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2010)
  • Y.N. Zhang et al.

    Hydrogen production through biomass gasification in supercritical water: a review from exergy aspect

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2019)
  • X. Zhao et al.

    Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2017)
  • C.Q. Cao et al.

    Co-gasification of plastic wastes and soda lignin in supercritical water

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2020)
  • H. Jin et al.

    Hydrogen production by Zhundong coal gasification in supercritical water

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2015)
  • H. Jin et al.

    Interfacial surface investigation of super-critical water gasification of corn cob

    Therm. Sci.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of lignin catalyzed by Ni supported on various zeolites

      2022, Fuel
      Citation Excerpt :

      Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is an efficient and clean technology to produce hydrogen from biomass and organic wastes, such as black liquor, chicken manure and waste plastics [11-13]. In supercritical water, most organic matters and gases are miscible, which formed a homogeneous reaction environment to reduce the interphase mass transfer resistance and accelerate the reaction rate [14-16]. Among the main organic components of biomass, lignin was more difficult to be gasified than cellulose and hemicellulose in SCW [5,17].

    • Production forecast analysis of BP neural network based on Yimin lignite supercritical water gasification experiment results

      2022, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the particle scale, Li et al. and Wu et al. used the direct numerical simulation method to study particles' heat transfer and flow characteristics. They obtained the drag coefficient and heat transfer prediction formula of endothermic particles in SCW [8–10]. Fan et al. used numerical simulation and experimental methods to study the influence of multiple factors in SCW for a single coal particle [11,12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text