Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Information Needs of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors: a Decision Tree Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through a decision tree analysis, this study aimed to determine the characteristics of Asian American breast cancer survivors who had higher decreases in their need for information by a technology-based information and coaching/support program compared with their counterparts. This is a part of a larger randomized controlled trial; only the data from 99 Asian American breast cancer survivors were used for this analysis. The measurement scales included the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form, the Cancer Behavior Inventory, the Questions on Attitudes, Subjective Norm, Perceived Behavioral Control and Behavioral Intention, and the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form 34. The data analysis was done using t-tests, chi-square tests, repeated measurement analyses, and a decision tree analysis. The information needs scores of all the participants decreased during the 3-month intervention period (p < .005). However, only the intervention group had statistically significant decreases in the information needs scores during the 3 months (dif. =  − 8.545; p < .005). Those with low social influence scores and high self-efficacy scores had significantly larger decreases in their information needs scores compared with the average change scores (100%, p < 01). Asian American breast cancer survivors with low social influences and high self-efficacy would highly benefit from a technology-based intervention for their need for information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data cannot be shared because no permission to share has been obtained from the funding agency. Yet, at the completion of the larger study, the data will be shared for secondary analyses with researchers who wish to investigate the effectiveness of a culturally tailored technology-based information and coaching/support program on various variables other than the major outcome variables of the original study.

Code Availability

The SPSS-formatted data and codes are available, but the author(s) do not have the permission to share the data from the funding agency. Yet, at the completion of the larger study, the data will be shared for secondary analyses as explained above.

References

  1. Institute of Medicine (2008) Challenges and successes in reducing health disparities: workshop summary. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12154/challenges-and-successes-in-reducing-health-disparities-workshop-summary. Accessed 14 June 2021

  2. Meneses K, Benz R (2010) Quality of life in cancer survivorship: 20 years later. Semin Oncol Nurs 26(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM (2005) Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5814–5830. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinto BM, Trunzo JJ (2005) Health behaviors during and after a cancer diagnosis. Cancer 104(11 Suppl):2614–2623. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuno RK, Costantino JP, Ziegler RG, Anderson GL, Li H, Pee D, Gail MH (2011) Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in Asian and Pacific Islander American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(12):951–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Im E-O, Lee EO, Park YS (2002) Korean women’s breast cancer experience. West J Nurs Res 24(7): 751–765; discussion 766–771

  7. Hill P, Lipson J, Meleis AI (2003) Caring for women cross-culturally. FA Davis Company, Philadelphia

  8. Kagawa-Singer M, Wellisch DK, Durvasula R (1997) Impact of breast cancer on Asian American and Anglo American women. Cult Med Psychiatry 21(4):449–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashing-Giwa KT, Kagawa-Singer M, Padilla GV, Tejero JS, Hsiao E, Chhabra R, Martinez L, Belinda Tucker M (2004) The impact of cervical cancer and dysplasia: a qualitative, multiethnic study. Psychooncology 13(10):709–728. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.785

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yi JK, Swartz MD, Reyes-Gibby CC (2011) English proficiency, symptoms, and quality of life in Vietnamese- and Chinese-American breast cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage 42(1):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung-Won L, Yi J (2009) The effects of religiosity, spirituality, and social support on quality of life: a comparison between Korean American and Korean breast and gynecologic cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 36(6):699–708. https://doi.org/10.1188/09.ONF.699-708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim J-W, Zebrack B (2008) Different pathways in social support and quality of life between Korean American and Korean breast and gynecological cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 17(5):679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9343-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim J-W, Ashing-Giwa KT (2013) Is family functioning and communication associated with health-related quality of life for Chinese- and Korean-American breast cancer survivors? Qual Life Res 22(6):1319–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0247-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashing-Giwa KT, Padilla G, Tejero J, Kraemer J, Wright K, Coscarelli A, Clayton S, Williams I, Hills D (2004) Understanding the breast cancer experience of women: a qualitative study of African American, Asian American Latina and Caucasian cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 13(6):408–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.750

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. American Cancer Society (2021) Cancer facts and figures, 2021. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2021.html Accessed 1 June 2021

  16. Chlebowski RT, Chen Z, Anderson GL, Rohan T, Aragaki A, Lane D, Dolan NC, Paskett ED, Anne McTiernan F, Hubbell A, Adams-Campbell LL, Prentice R (2005) Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(6):439–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pekmezi DW, Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Jennings EG, Lewis BA, Jakicic JM, Marcus BH (2010) Feasibility of using computer-tailored and internet-based interventions to promote physical activity in underserved populations. Telemedicine and E-Health 16(4):498–503. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Agboola SO, Woong Ju, Elfiky A, Kvedar JC, Jethwani K (2015) The effect of technology-based interventions on pain, depression, and quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 17(3):e65. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Im Eun-Ok, Ji Xiaopeng, Kim Sangmi, Chee Eunice, Bao Ting, Mao Jun J, Chee Wonshik (2019) Challenges in a technology-based cancer pain management program among Asian American breast cancer survivors. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 37(5):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Im E-O, Kim S, Lee C, Chee E, Mao JJ, Chee W (2019) Decreasing menopausal symptoms of Asian American breast cancer survivors through a technology-based information and coaching/support program. Menopause 26(4):373–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001249

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE, Coan A, Staley T, Wheeler JL, Rowe K, Smith SK, Shaw H, Lyerly HK (2010) Phase 2 pilot study of Pathfinders: a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients. Supp Care Cancer 18(7): 893-898.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0823-z

  22. Kamiński B, Jakubczyk M, Szufel P (2018) A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees. CEJOR 26:135–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0479-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Im E-O, Kim S, Shu Xu, Lee C, Hamajima Y, Inohara A, Chang K, Chee E, Chee W (2020) Issues in recruiting and retaining Asian American breast cancer survivors in a technology-based intervention study. Cancer Nurs 43(1):E22–E29. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000657

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spector RE (2012) Cultural diversity in health and illness, 8th edn. Prentice Hall, Hoboken, New Jersey

  26. Resnicow K, Soler R, Braithwaite RL, Ahluwalia JS, Butler J (2000) Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention. J Community Psychol 28(3):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Im E-O, Lee SH, Liu Yi, Lim H-J, Guevara E, Chee W (2009) A national online forum on ethnic differences in cancer pain experience. Nurs Res 58(2):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818fcea4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Im E-O, Kim S, Yang YL, Chee W (2020) The efficacy of a technology-based information and coaching/support program on pain and symptoms in Asian American survivors of breast cancer. Cancer 126(3):670–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlander-Klar H, Kiyasu E, Sobel K, Coyle N, Kemeny N, Norton L (1994) The memorial symptom assessment scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer 30(9):1326–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Heitzmann CA, Merluzzi TV, Jean-Pierre P, Roscoe JA, Kirsh KL, Passik SD (2001) Assessing self-efficacy for coping with cancer: development and psychometric analysis of the brief version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI-B). Psychooncology 10(3):206–217

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell SH, Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Barker D, Turner D, Taylor-Brown J, Hall A (2014) Measuring the unmet supportive care needs of cancer support persons: the development of the support person’s unmet needs survey—Short form. Eur J Cancer Care 23(2):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grove S, Burns N, Gray J (2012) The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence, 9th edn. Elsevier, St. Louise

  33. Kim SH, Kim S (2016) National culture and social desirability bias in measuring public service motivation. Admin Soc 48(4):444–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713498749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lieberman MA, Goldstein BA (2005) Self-help on-line: an outcome evaluation of breast cancer bulletin boards. J Health Psychol 10(6):855–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305057319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAFJ (2008) Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 18(3):405–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307313429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J, Cella DF, Serlin RC, Apantaku FM, Stewart J, Salner A (2001) Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 16(7):435–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, Bricker E, Pingree S, Chan C-L (1994) The use and impact of a computer-based support system for people living with AIDS and HIV infection. Proceeding of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. American Medical Informatics Association. 1994: 604–608

  38. Houston TK, Cooper LA, Ford DE (2002) Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 159(12):2062–2068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lieberman MA, Golant M, Giese-Davis J, Winzlenberg A, Benjamin H, Humphreys K, Kronenwetter C, Russo S, Spiegel D (2003) Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer 97(4):920–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, Wise M, Taylor J, Apantaku FM, Berhe H, Thorson B (1995) CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System): an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. J Ambulat Care Manag 18(3):35–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin SD, Youngren KB (2002) Help on the net: internet support groups for people dealing with cancer. Home Healthc Nurse 20(12):771–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Høybye MT, Dalton SO, Deltour I, Bidstrup PE, Frederiksen K, Johansen C (2010) Effect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised study. Br J Cancer 102(9):1348–1354. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605646

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tu S-P, Chen H, Chen A, Lim J, May S, Drescher C (2005) Clinical trials: understanding and perceptions of female Chinese-American cancer patients. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):2999–3005. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37(2):122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Williams DM, Rhodes RE (2016) The confounded self-efficacy construct: review, conceptual analysis, and recommendations for future research. Health Psychol Rev 10(2):113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NCI/NINR; 1R01CA203719).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Wonshik Chee is a Co-I of the parent study, designed the study, and drafted the manuscript; Dr. Jee-Seon Yi conducted the data analysis and drafted the manuscript with Dr. Chee and Dr. Eun-Ok Im is the PI of the parent study, designed the study with Dr. Chee, drafted the manuscript with Drs. Chee and Yi, and provided feedback on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Ok Im.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The larger study was approved by Emory University, Institutional Review Board (IRB00117270).

Consent to Participate

All the participants consented to participate in the study through an electronic consent process.

Consent for Publication

All the participants consented to publications without disclosing their identity-related information (e.g., name, other factors that might point to an individual participant).

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chee, W., Yi, JS. & Im, EO. Information Needs of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors: a Decision Tree Analysis. J Canc Educ 37, 1902–1911 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02059-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02059-2

Keywords

Navigation