Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Learning Experience in Inquiry-Based Physics with Immersive Virtual Reality: Student Perceptions and an Interaction Effect Between Conceptual Gains and Attitudinal Profiles

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

The integration of immersive virtual reality (VR) in authentic science classrooms can result in a totally new learning experience for the students. However, the effect of such a learning experience on students’ conceptual learning gains and their perceptions of the experience, while considering students’ pre-existing science- and digital technologies-related attitudinal profiles, has not been explored to date. In this study, we have enacted a 90-min technology-enhanced inquiry-based intervention with high-school students (n = 107), on the topic of the Special Theory of Relativity in a Physics course, using a learning experience design, structured around an immersive VR simulation. Firstly, we aimed at examining students’ attitudinal profiles and, secondly, at exploring the potential differences of those profiles in relation to conceptual learning gains and perceptions of the learning experience. A clustering analysis has revealed two attitudinal profiles: the low-attitudes profile (n = 48) included students with low science- and digital technologies-related attitudes, and the opposite for the high-attitudes profile (n = 59). Results from a 2 × 2 RM ANOVA indicated a statistically significant interaction between conceptual learning gains and attitudinal profiles. In addition, a one-way MANOVA test showed statistically significant differences between the two profiles in relation to students’ perceptions of the learning experience, with the students of the high-attitude profile outperforming their counterparts. We discuss our findings, focusing on the implications of students’ individual differences in learning and attitudes linked to the integration of immersive VR in inquiry-based instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 08 July 2021

    The original version of this paper was updated. The acknowledgment should be removed.

References

  • Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriassecq, I., & Greca, I. M. (2012). A teaching–learning sequence for the special relativity theory at high school level historically and epistemologically contextualized. Science & Education, 21(6), 827–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aina, J. K. (2013). Integration of ICT into physics learning to improve students’ academic achievement: Problems and solutions. Open Journal of Education, 1(4), 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., Karrigan, K., & Johnson, C. (2000). Virtual solar system project: learning through a technology-rich, inquiry-based, participatory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., & Trundle, K. C. (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 346–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, M., Christian, W., & Dancy, M. H. (2004). Teaching special relativity using Physlets®. The Physics Teacher, 42(5), 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogusevschi, D., Muntean, C., & Muntean, G. M. (2020). Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: a case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 39(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzer, G., & Reiner, M. (2005). Imagery in physics learning-from physicists’ practice to naive students’ understanding. In Visualization in science education (pp. 147–168). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms: understanding ‘a framework for K-12 science education.’ Science Teacher, 78(9), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., & Bossomaier, T. (2011). Relativity in a rock field: a study of physics learning with a computer game. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6).

  • Carr, D. N., Bossomaier, T., & Lodge, K. (2007, August). Designing a computer game to teach Einstein's Theory of Relativity. In Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV 2007) (pp. 109-114). IEEE.

  • Chang, H. Y., Wang, C. Y., Lee, M. H., Wu, H. K., Liang, J. C., Lee, S. W. Y., & Hsu, C. Y. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. H., & Chen, C. Y. (2012). Instructional approaches on science performance, attitude and inquiry ability in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(1), 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, G., Humer, I., & Eckhardt, C. (2019, June). Special relativity in immersive learning. In International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 16–29). Springer, Cham.

  • Cohen, D. (1971). Can scientific attitudes be evaluated? Research in Science Education, 1(1), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, P. C., Tsivitanidou, E. O., & Rybska E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In Tsivitanidou, O., Gray, p., Rybska, E., Louca, L., & Constantinou, P. C. (Eds.), Professional development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning. (pp. 1-23), Springer, Cham. eBook ISBN: 978-3-319-91406-0; Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-319-91405-3.

  • Crawley, F. E., & Black, C. B. (1992). Causal modeling of secondary science students’ intentions to enroll in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 585–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.

  • De Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2018). Logic-The theory of inquiry. Read Books Ltd.

  • Dimitriadi, K., & Halkia, K. (2012). Secondary students’ understanding of basic ideas of special relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 34(16), 2565–2582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, J. R., & Bradley, E. G. (2018). Education student perceptions of virtual reality as a learning tool. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(3), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstad, E. (2016). Introduction. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. vii–x). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fegely, A. G., Hagan, H. N., & Warriner, G. H., III. (2020). A practitioner framework for blended learning classroom inquiry-based virtual reality lessons. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 521–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, G. W. (2014). Undergraduates’ attitudes toward science and their epistemological beliefs: positive effects of certainty and authority beliefs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review.

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2019, September). Investigating in-service teachers’ concerns about adopting technology-enhanced embodied learning. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 595-599). Springer, Cham.

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2019). Teachers’ concerns about adopting technology-enhanced embodied learning and their mitigation through Professional Development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(3), 335-371.

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2021). Developing, Enacting and Evaluating a Learning Experience Design for Technology-Enhanced Embodied Learning in Math Classrooms. TechTrends, 65(1), 38-50.

  • Georgiou, Y., Ioannou, A., & Ioannou, M. (2019). Investigating immersion and learning in a low-embodied versus high-embodied digital educational game: Lessons learned from an implementation in an authentic school classroom. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(4), 68.

  • Georgiou, Y., Tsivitanidou, O., Eckhardt, C., & Ioannou, A. (2020, June). Work-in-Progress—A learning experience design for immersive virtual reality in physics classrooms. In 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) (pp. 263–266). IEEE. ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9155097

  • Goodson, I. F., Mangan, J. M., & Cultures, S. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. A., Barnett, M., MaKinster, J. G., & Keating, T. (2004). The impact of three-dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomical concepts: a quantitative analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1365–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haury, D. L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. ERIC/CSMEE Digest, March (ED 359048).

  • Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. U. E. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: a review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R., Childers, G., & Jones, M. G. (2019). Review of virtual reality hardware employed in K-20 science education. In Y. (Aimee) Zhang & D. Cristol (Eds.), Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning (pp. 1389–1399). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2766-7_123

  • Horwitz, P., Taylor, E. F., & Hickman, P. (1994). “Relativity readiness” using the RelLab program. The Physics Teacher, 32(2), 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., & Maton, K. (2011). Theorising knowledge practices: a missing piece of the educational technology puzzle. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., Chan, A., Mozejko, A., & Caputi, P. (2015). Technology practices: Confirmatory factor analysis and exploration of teachers’ technology integration in subject areas. Computers & Education, 90, 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2005). Exploring user’s attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 729–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, M., Ioannou, A., Georgiou, Y., & Retalis, S. (2020). Designing and orchestrating the classroom experience for technology-enhanced embodied learning. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 2, pp. 1079–1086). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Jambi, E., Gardner, M., & Callaghan, V. (2019, June). A generalized pedagogical framework for creating mixed-mode role-play in multi-user virtual environments. In International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 158–171). Springer, Cham.

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowallah, R., Bennett, L., & Bastedo, K. (2018). Leveraging the affordances of virtual reality systems within K-12 education: responding to future innovations. FDLA Journal, 3(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. (1993). A practical research tool for assessing ability to use computers: the computer ability survey (CAS). Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 26, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. (2006). Effects of 3D virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth grade students’ achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B.S. Bloom, J.T. Hastings, & G.F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook on Summative and formative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York, McGraw-Hill.

  • Koballa, T. R., Jr., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85(3), 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 1, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollöffel, B., & de Jong, T. (2013). Conceptual understanding of electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in a virtual lab. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyza, E. A., Constantinou, C. P., & Spanoudis, G. (2011). Sixth graders’ co-construction of explanations of a disturbance in an ecosystem: exploring relationships between grouping, reflective scaffolding, and evidence-based explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2489–2525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J. W., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? a systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCroy, C. W., & Krysik, J. (2007). Understanding and interpreting effect size measures. Social Work Research, 31(4), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J. (2004). Taiwanese students’ scientific attitudes, environmental perceptions, self-efficacy, and achievement in microbiology courses. University of South Dakota.

  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). An online questionnaire for evaluating students’ and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments. Research in Science Education, 35(2–3), 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, A., & Sakellariou, S. (2002). The role of ICT in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., Chalkidis, A., Katsikis, A., & Emvalotis, A. (1998). Students’ attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Education and Information Technologies, 3(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: a ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, H. P., & Russell, M. (2012). Understanding factors associated with teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: a structural equation modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 652e666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01228.x

  • Myers, J. M., & Halpin, R. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes and use of multimedia technology in the classroom: constructivist-based professional development training for school districts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

  • Newell, A. D., Zientek, L. R., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G. L., & Moreno, N. P. (2015). Students’ attitudes toward science as predictors of gains on student content knowledge: benefits of an after-school program. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olasehinde, K. J., & Olatoye, R. A. (2014). Scientific attitude, attitude to science and science achievement of senior secondary school students in Katsina State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(1), 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: a longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkal, K. (2007). Scientific epistemological beliefs, perceptions of constructivist learning environment and attitude towards science as determinants of students approaches to learning. Unpublished master’s thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? a critical analysis of teachers’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314e327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x

  • Pirker, J., Gütl, C., Belcher, J. W., & Bailey, P. H. (2013). Design and evaluation of a learner-centric immersive virtual learning environment for physics education. In International Conference on Human Factors in Computing and Informatics (pp. 551–561). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  • Pirker, J., Berger, S., Guetl, C., Belcher, J., & Bailey, P. H. (2012). Understanding physical concepts using an immersive virtual learning environment. Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit, Paris, 183–191.

  • Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, A., Chen, M. Y., Zou, D., Hives, B. A., & Liu, Y. (2019). Researching multiple publics through latent profile analysis: similarities and differences in science and technology attitudes in China, Japan, South Korea and the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 28(2), 130–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, E. J. (1971). Measurement of scientific attitudes held by Victorian Secondary School Children in 1968. Unpublished M.Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltiel, E., & Malgrange, J. L. (1980). ‘Spontaneous’ ways of reasoning in elementary kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 1, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, Y. J., Makki, T. W., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2020). Distributing computing devices in classrooms: Hedonic and utilitarian influences on science and technology attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(7), 973–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schibeci, R. A. (1983). Selecting appropriate attitudinal objectives for school science. Science Education, 67(5), 595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, C., Scott, T., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Knott, M. (1974). A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 507–512.

  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach (pp. 127–167). Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, K. C., Park, J. S., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. H., Park, Y. C., & Ryu, H. I. (2003). Application of virtual reality technology in biology education. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. S. (2002). Virtual reality simulations in web-based science education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 10(1), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, E., Smith, S. P., Cividino, C., Saxby, S., Kilham, J., Eather, G., & Bergin, C. (2019). Embedding immersive virtual reality in classrooms: ethical, organisational and educational lessons in bridging research and practice. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 19, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. F. (1989). Space-time software: computer graphics utilities in special relativity. American Journal of Physics, 57(6), 508–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2006). Attitudes toward computers: a study of post-secondary students in Singapore. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: an Asian perspective. Computers and Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2008). Development and validation of a computer attitude measure for young students (CAMYS). Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2659–2667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82(4), 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, D., Borchers, M., Ertl, T., Falk, M., Fechtig, O., Frank, R., & Zatloukal, M. (2006). Explanatory and illustrative visualization of special and general relativity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(4), 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. A. R., & Richardson, G. D. (1993). Comparison of science attitudes among middle and junior high school students.

  • Winn, W. (1993). A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. Technical Publication R-93–9, Human Interface Technology Laboratory of the Washington Technology Center. Seattle: University of Washington.

  • Winn, W., & Windschitl, M. (2000). Learning science in virtual environments: the interplay of theory and experience. Themes in Education, 1(4), 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2019). Integrating spherical video-based virtual reality into elementary school students’ scientific inquiry instruction: effects on their problem-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.

Download references

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No 739578 and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus through the Deputy Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digital Policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CYENS Center of Excellence, 23 Dimarchias Square, 1016, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Olia E. Tsivitanidou, Yiannis Georgiou & Andri Ioannou

  2. Culture, Sport and Youth, Kimonos and Thoukydidou Corner, Cyprus Ministry of Education, 1434, Akropoli, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Yiannis Georgiou

  3. Cyprus Interaction Lab, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

    Andri Ioannou

Authors
  1. Olia E. Tsivitanidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yiannis Georgiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andri Ioannou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olia E. Tsivitanidou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all the participants.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsivitanidou, O.E., Georgiou, Y. & Ioannou, A. A Learning Experience in Inquiry-Based Physics with Immersive Virtual Reality: Student Perceptions and an Interaction Effect Between Conceptual Gains and Attitudinal Profiles. J Sci Educ Technol 30, 841–861 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09924-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09924-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation