Skip to main content
Log in

Filling in the gaps: observing gestures conveying additional information can compensate for missing verbal content

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While observing gesture has been shown to benefit narrative recall and learning, research has yet to show whether gestures that provide information that is missing from speech benefit narrative recall. This study explored whether observing gestures that relay the same information as speech and gestures that provide information missing from speech differentially affect narrative recall in university students. Participants were presented with a videotaped narrative told in one of four conditions: with gestures and no missing verbal information, with gestures and missing verbal information, with no gestures and no missing verbal information, or with no gestures and missing verbal information. Results showed that observing gestures that provided additional information to speech (i.e., when the speech was missing vital information) enhanced narrative recall compared to observing no gestures, while observing gestures that did not provide additional information to speech were no more beneficial than observing no gestures at all. Findings from the current study provide valuable insight into the beneficial effect of iconic gesture on narrative recall, with important implications for education and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Supplied on request by contacting the corresponding author, Nicole Dargue.

References

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Megan Phillips and all authors contributed to the data analysis process. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nicole Dargue and Naomi Sweller and all authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Dargue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee; Reference Number: 5201800134) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or a comparable ethical standard.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

Narrative gesture and non-gesture phrases (missing verbal information conditions)

Donald Duck had a garden full of watermelons and one of them had won a prize [first prize gesture] at a local fair. While watering his garden, Donald Duck noticed that he had run out of water, so he [skipped] over to a water station to refill his bucket.

When Donald Duck first got [pumped gesture] water out using the lever, the water did not fill up the bucket because the water only [dribbled out]. When Donald Duck tried to use the lever again, the water came out too far. This [frustrated] Donald because he could not seem to fill up his bucket with water.

After using the lever again, the water finally went into the bucket. However, the water kept [spurting out of the water station] and pushed the bucket over to a ledge, where it began to move [tilt back and forth gesture]. Donald rushed over to the ledge to try and stop the bucket from falling, but it was too late. The bucket had fallen off the ledge, spilling all of the water onto the ground.

Donald Duck [picked up gesture] took the bucket back to the water station. This time, Donald Duck moved the lever up and down so fast that the water station began to change shape [expand gesture], but only a drop of water came out. Donald duck looked into the tap to see why the water was not coming out, and all of a sudden, water began spurting out [gesture towards eye].

Donald Duck then moved the lever up and down as fast as it could go. A stream of water spurted out, and he chased it with his bucket [back and forth gesture]. He continued to chase the water all the way back to the water station, but he ran so fast that his beak got stuck in the nozzle and water burst out of him [gesture burst out of his nose]. Donald Duck slammed the bucket down in front of the water station and moved the lever up and down once more. The pressure in the water station built up so much that water came blasting out which caused Donald Duck to get pushed [gesture up in the sky].

When Donald Duck landed back on the ground, he noticed that his bucket had been filled up with water. As he went to get it, something happened to the bucket [the bucket broke gesture], leaving the water sitting there in the shape of a bucket. Donald Duck watched as the water burst. He looked down at the puddle quacking angrily and watched as [the water slowly disappeared into a hole in the ground].

Bold = Gesture Phrase

Italic = Non-Gesture Phrase

Appendix B

See Table 4 

Table 4 Gestures and corresponding speech phrases for missing and non-missing verbal information conditions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dargue, N., Phillips, M. & Sweller, N. Filling in the gaps: observing gestures conveying additional information can compensate for missing verbal content. Instr Sci 49, 637–659 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09549-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09549-2

Keywords

Navigation