Skip to main content
Log in

Kant Walks Meillassoux: Finitude and Correlationism

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses Quentin Meillassoux’s criticism of Kantian philosophy. The objective of the paper is to delineate the connection Meillassoux asserts between the problem of induction and Kant’s account of finitude. After examining Meillassoux’s elucidations on the connection between the two, I argue that Meillassoux’s characterization of Kantian philosophy as ‘weak correlationism’ is not only inaccurate but also undermines the novelty of Kantian philosophy, especially Kant’s (critical) response to the problem of induction. The paper concludes with the claim that Meillassoux’s criticism of modern philosophy, especially Kantian critical philosophy, does not convince us to abandon the problem of finitude but points to the need for a more accurate understanding of finitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Edited by P. H. Nidditch (Lewis A. Selby-Bigge, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Kant, I. (2007). Critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Kant, I. (2004). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. Rev. ed. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Malabou, C. (2014). Can we relinquish the transcendental? The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 28(3), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2008). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Continuum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2011a). Appendix: Excerpts from L’Inexistence divine. In G. Harman (Ed.), Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the making (pp. 175–238). Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2011b). Potentiality and virtuality. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, & G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism (pp. 224–236). Re.Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2012). ‘There is contingent being independent of us, and this contingent being has no reason to be of a subjective nature’: Interview with Quentin Meillassoux. In I. van der Tuin & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 71–84). Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. J. Robin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robin, E.J. Kant Walks Meillassoux: Finitude and Correlationism. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 38, 197–211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-021-00244-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-021-00244-8

Keywords

Navigation