Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
Identifying distinct heterochromatin regions using combinatorial epigenetic probes in live cells
Introduction
The mammalian nucleus is functionally divided into several regions comprising primarily of the chromatin, the nucleolus, and transcription factories [1]. Gene rich regions tend to be loosely compacted (euchromatin or EC) and are commonly found near the center of the nucleus. Densely compacted, largely gene poor regions [[2], [3]] (heterochromatin or HC) are most abundant near the nuclear periphery [4]. Accumulating evidence suggests that the 3D spatial arrangement of chromatin largely encodes cell functionality [[5], [6]], dictates inter- and intra- chromosomal interactions [7], partially programs transcription profile [8], and thus ultimately determines the phenotype [9]. In healthy cells, euchromatin and heterochromatin regions typically have well-defined boundaries which are essential for distinctive gene activity and maintaining integrity during cellular processes [10].
Heterochromatin formation is the driving force behind the observed 3D architecture of the genome and forms a basis for understanding the spatial organization within the nucleus. The formation of heterochromatin occurs very early in development and is crucial for differentiation [11], as well as the establishment and maintenance of nuclear organization in mammalian cells [[12], [13]]. Repetitive DNA regions and developmentally regulated genes are the major components of HC within the genome [2]. Functionally, heterochromatin may be divided into two sub-classes [2,14]: i. constitutive heterochromatin (cHC) which is highly stable, heavily compacted, and gene poor, and, ii. facultative heterochromatin (fHC) which tends to be less compacted, developmentally regulated, and transcriptionally poised. The functional distinction between cHC and fHC is important because though both are transcriptionally silent, fHC retains the potential to interconvert between cHC and EC [15].
Both the cHC and fHC modulate chromatin to maintain nuclear stability and prevent the access of transcriptional machinery to repetitive DNA elements, curtailing their transcription and recombination. The boundaries and spatial organization of both the cHC and fHC must be maintained. Disruptions in the cHC and fHC can result in genomic instability [[16], [17]], transcription of transposable elements and silenced repeats [18], and loss of genomic organization. For instance, heterochromatin de-condensation is commonly seen in cancer cells, such as in breast and ovarian cancer where the inactive X chromosome is de-compacted leading to the expression of X linked genes [19]. The dramatic loss of heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery, leading to poor staining in malignant cancer cells, has long been used as a maker by pathologists to identify specific cancers [20]. The destabilization of HC and subsequent epigenomic instability is, however, an understudied topic area in cancer biology warranting careful studies. The distinction between cHC and fHC is difficult to accomplish by conventional cytological stains [14]. Delineating these two areas is thus of key importance in processes where the heterochromatin is disrupted.
HC is typically identified in single cells via the simple stains that bind to DNA. These include 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for fixed cells and Hoechst 33342 for live cells, which primarily bind to AT-rich heterochromatin regions, thus differentiating it from the euchromatin regions of lower DNA density. Other approaches to identify heterochromatin are banding and FISH [[21], [22]], which rely on the tightly compacted nature of heterochromatin DNA, or the use of specific DNA sequences, respectively, to identify heterochromatin regions. The distinction between fHC and cHC, however, has been difficult to accomplish without the use of antibodies specific to epigenetic marks found at these regions [23]. For instance, the cHC is primarily characterized by a high density of H3K9me3 and DNA methylation [2] while the fHC is enriched in H3K27me3 [14]. However, antibody-based methods require a fixation step which is not conducive to live cell applications.
In this work, we present an approach to monitor fHC and cHC regions based on epigenetic readouts. The probes directly inform the spatial distribution and abundance of epigenetic modifications and thus offer a convenient tool to reveal the contributions of HC to various biological processes.
Section snippets
Construction and verification of the heterochromatin probes
To identify and quantify epigenetic modifications (H3K9me3, H3K27me3 and DNA methylation (5mC)), we have engineered protein probes based on a tandem repeat strategy as we detailed in our previous work [[24], [25]] and literature [[26], [27], [28]]. This tandem repeat strategy, in which adjacent repeats of the same epigenetic “reader” domain are linked via a flexible linker to form multimeric constructs (e.g. dimer, trimer, etc.), was adopted due to the enhancement in the epigenetic target
Quantifying constitutive heterochromatin (cHC) levels
A microscopy-based approach can be instrumental in examining the spatial distribution of heterochromatin associated modifications within the cell. We tested the H3K9me3 and 5mC probes in HEK293T cells (live cell images in Fig. S4 (Supporting Information), probe schematic in Fig. 1A) and observed the characteristic cHC distribution. The H3K9me3 probe is localized at the nuclear periphery [54] and around the peri-nucleolar regions forming distinct ring-like structures around the nucleolus [[55],
Conclusions
We developed a sensing platform for simultaneous tracking of multiple epigenetic features inside cell nucleus. Combinations of various epigenetic features, particularly silencing markers, will allow us to monitor and distinguish heterochromatin regions (e.g., constitutive vs. facultative) over time with and without external perturbations. The ability to perform FRET images using two probes enables us to track chromatin region with bivalent features, most likely co-exist within a single
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Conceptualization: AM, OS, JX and CY.
Methodology: AM, OS, JX, LL, AC and CY.
Validation: AM, OS, JX, LL and AC.
Formal Analysis/Investigation: AM, OS, and JX.
Data Curation: AM, OS, and JX.
Writing: AM, OS, and JX.
Visualization: AM, OS, and JX.
Supervision/Project Administration: AM, OS and CY.
Funding acquisition: CY.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [CBET-1512285, CBET-1705560 & EF-1935226]. Support from the Purdue Center for Cancer Research Pilot Grant Program is gratefully acknowledged.
References (85)
- et al.
New insights into the regulation of heterochromatin
Trends Genet.
(2016) Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function
Cell
(2007)- et al.
The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication
Cell
(2016) - et al.
The 3D genome in transcriptional regulation and pluripotency
Cell Stem Cell
(2014) - et al.
Structure meets function: how chromatin organisation conveys functionality
Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol.
(2017) - et al.
Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo
Dev. Biol.
(2002) - et al.
Facultative heterochromatin: is there a distinctive molecular signature?
Mol. Cell
(2007) - et al.
Specificity of the chromodomain Y chromosome family of chromodomains for lysine-methylated ARK (S/T) motifs
J. Biol. Chem.
(2008) - et al.
One-pot approach for examining the DNA methylation patterns using an engineered methyl-probe
Biosens. Bioelectron.
(2014) - et al.
C-ETS transcription factors play an essential role in the licensing of human MCM4 origin of replication
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gene Regul. Mech.
(2015)
Stimulation of ribosomal RNA gene promoter by transcription factor Sp1 involves active DNA demethylation by Gadd45-NER pathway
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gene Regul. Mech.
Identification of novel quinoline inhibitor for EHMT2/G9a through virtual screening
Biochimie
Negative regulation of hypoxic responses via induced reptin methylation
Mol. Cell
Reversal of H3K9me2 by a small-molecule inhibitor for the G9a histone methyltransferase
Mol. Cell
Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells
Biophys. J.
Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery
Cell
Dynamic changes in histone H3 lysine 9 methylations identification of a mitosis-specific function for dynamic methylation in chromosome congression and segregation
J. Biol. Chem.
Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin
Mol. Cell
Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability
Cell
Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals
Trends Genet.
Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin
Curr. Biol.
Setdb1-mediated histone H3K9 hypermethylation in neurons worsens the neurological phenotype of Mecp2-deficient mice
Neuropharmacology
Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells
Cell Stem Cell
H3K4/H3K9me3 bivalent chromatin domains targeted by lineage-specific DNA methylation pauses adipocyte differentiation
Mol. Cell
Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells
Nat. Rev. Genet.
Constitutive heterochromatin formation and transcription in mammals
Epigenetics Chromatin
Mammalian Su (var) genes in chromatin control
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
On emerging nuclear order
J. Cell Biol.
Higher levels of organization in the interphase nucleus of cycling and differentiated cells
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
The NoRC complex mediates the heterochromatin formation and stability of silent rRNA genes and centromeric repeats
EMBO J.
Chromatin regulatory mechanisms in pluripotency
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
Internal structure of the 30 nm chromatin fiber
J. Cell Sci.
Unphosphorylated STAT and heterochromatin protect genome stability
FASEB J.
Heterochromatin revisited
Nat. Rev. Genet.
H3K9 methylation and RNA interference regulate nucleolar organization and repeated DNA stability
Nat. Cell Biol.
The cytologic criteria of malignancy
J. Cell. Biochem.
Detection of chromosomal aberrations in clinical practice: from karyotype to genome sequence
Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.
Understanding heterochromatin characterization through chromosome banding
J. Biol. Sci. Med.
Remodeling of nuclear landscapes during human myelopoietic cell differentiation maintains co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments
Epigenetics Chromatin
Engineering recombinant protein sensors for quantifying histone acetylation
ACS Sensors
Monitoring histone methylation (H3K9me3) changes in live cells
ACS Omega
Cited by (6)
Fluorescence imaging of epigenetic genome modifications
2022, Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsCitation Excerpt :However, oligomerization of MBD leads to increased affinity without loss of specificity [39]. The dimeric probe NLS-2xMBD-mCherry in combination with the histone modification recognizing probes with EGFP protein were applied for FRET analysis of different epigenetic modification colocalization in heterochromatin regions [40]. To study 5mC DNA methylation in vivo in Arabidopsis two genetically encoded probes containing fluorescent proteins were generated [41].
Lead exposure induces dysregulation of constitutive heterochromatin hallmarks in live cells
2022, Current Research in ToxicologyCitation Excerpt :Epigenetic “readers” with high affinity and selectivity towards targeted epigenetic marks were selected based on literature reports and our previous experimental validation work. Briefly, detection of meCpG was conducted via a probe constituted by the methyl binding domain (MBD) of MBD1 protein (Kim et al., 2014; Jørgensen et al., 2006; Mendonca et al., 2021), and H3K9me3 was detected via a probe constituted by the chromodomain of the chromodomain Y chromosome (CDY) (Mendonca et al., 2021; Fischle et al., 2008). The detailed amino acid sequence of the construct was summarized in Table S1 (Supporting Information).
Recent Advances in Investigating Functional Dynamics of Chromatin
2022, Frontiers in GeneticsMolecular probes for cellular imaging of post-translational proteoforms
2022, RSC Chemical Biology
- 1
These authors contributed equally to the work.