Identifying distinct heterochromatin regions using combinatorial epigenetic probes in live cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2021.194725Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Live cell probes were developed and validated for detecting heterochromatin regions enriched in meCpG, H3K9me3, or H3K27me3.

  • The probes enabled live-cell tracking of single cell chromatin marked with dual epigenetic modifications.

  • Co-localization of two epigenetic modifications was also demonstrated via FRET imaging.

Abstract

The 3D spatial organization of the genome controls gene expression and cell functionality. Heterochromatin (HC), which is the densely compacted and largely silenced part of the chromatin, is the driver for the formation and maintenance of nuclear organization in the mammalian nucleus. It is functionally divided into highly compact constitutive heterochromatin (cHC) and transcriptionally poised facultative heterochromatin (fHC). Long regarded as a static structure, the highly dynamic nature of the heterochromatin is being slowly understood and studied. These changes in HC occur on various temporal scales during the cell cycle and differentiation processes. Most methods that capture information about the heterochromatin are static techniques that cannot provide a readout of how the HC organization evolves with time. The delineation of specific areas such as fHC are also rendered difficult due to its diffusive nature and lack of specific features. Another degree of complexity in characterizing changes in heterochromatin occurs due to the heterogeneity in the HC organization of individual cells, necessitating single cell studies. Overall, there is a need for live cell compatible tools that can stably track the heterochromatin as it undergoes re-organization. In this work, we present an approach to track cHC and fHC based on the epigenetic hallmarks associated with them. Unlike conventional immunostaining approaches, we use small recombinant protein probes that allow us to dynamically monitor the HC by binding to modifications specific to the cHC and fHC, such as H3K9me3, DNA methylation and H3K27me3. We demonstrate the use of the probes to follow the changes in HC induced by drug perturbations at the single cell level. We also use the probe sets combinatorically to simultaneously track chromatin regions enriched in two selected epigenetic modifications using a FRET based approach that enabled us tracking distinctive chromatin features in situ.

Introduction

The mammalian nucleus is functionally divided into several regions comprising primarily of the chromatin, the nucleolus, and transcription factories [1]. Gene rich regions tend to be loosely compacted (euchromatin or EC) and are commonly found near the center of the nucleus. Densely compacted, largely gene poor regions [[2], [3]] (heterochromatin or HC) are most abundant near the nuclear periphery [4]. Accumulating evidence suggests that the 3D spatial arrangement of chromatin largely encodes cell functionality [[5], [6]], dictates inter- and intra- chromosomal interactions [7], partially programs transcription profile [8], and thus ultimately determines the phenotype [9]. In healthy cells, euchromatin and heterochromatin regions typically have well-defined boundaries which are essential for distinctive gene activity and maintaining integrity during cellular processes [10].

Heterochromatin formation is the driving force behind the observed 3D architecture of the genome and forms a basis for understanding the spatial organization within the nucleus. The formation of heterochromatin occurs very early in development and is crucial for differentiation [11], as well as the establishment and maintenance of nuclear organization in mammalian cells [[12], [13]]. Repetitive DNA regions and developmentally regulated genes are the major components of HC within the genome [2]. Functionally, heterochromatin may be divided into two sub-classes [2,14]: i. constitutive heterochromatin (cHC) which is highly stable, heavily compacted, and gene poor, and, ii. facultative heterochromatin (fHC) which tends to be less compacted, developmentally regulated, and transcriptionally poised. The functional distinction between cHC and fHC is important because though both are transcriptionally silent, fHC retains the potential to interconvert between cHC and EC [15].

Both the cHC and fHC modulate chromatin to maintain nuclear stability and prevent the access of transcriptional machinery to repetitive DNA elements, curtailing their transcription and recombination. The boundaries and spatial organization of both the cHC and fHC must be maintained. Disruptions in the cHC and fHC can result in genomic instability [[16], [17]], transcription of transposable elements and silenced repeats [18], and loss of genomic organization. For instance, heterochromatin de-condensation is commonly seen in cancer cells, such as in breast and ovarian cancer where the inactive X chromosome is de-compacted leading to the expression of X linked genes [19]. The dramatic loss of heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery, leading to poor staining in malignant cancer cells, has long been used as a maker by pathologists to identify specific cancers [20]. The destabilization of HC and subsequent epigenomic instability is, however, an understudied topic area in cancer biology warranting careful studies. The distinction between cHC and fHC is difficult to accomplish by conventional cytological stains [14]. Delineating these two areas is thus of key importance in processes where the heterochromatin is disrupted.

HC is typically identified in single cells via the simple stains that bind to DNA. These include 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for fixed cells and Hoechst 33342 for live cells, which primarily bind to AT-rich heterochromatin regions, thus differentiating it from the euchromatin regions of lower DNA density. Other approaches to identify heterochromatin are banding and FISH [[21], [22]], which rely on the tightly compacted nature of heterochromatin DNA, or the use of specific DNA sequences, respectively, to identify heterochromatin regions. The distinction between fHC and cHC, however, has been difficult to accomplish without the use of antibodies specific to epigenetic marks found at these regions [23]. For instance, the cHC is primarily characterized by a high density of H3K9me3 and DNA methylation [2] while the fHC is enriched in H3K27me3 [14]. However, antibody-based methods require a fixation step which is not conducive to live cell applications.

In this work, we present an approach to monitor fHC and cHC regions based on epigenetic readouts. The probes directly inform the spatial distribution and abundance of epigenetic modifications and thus offer a convenient tool to reveal the contributions of HC to various biological processes.

Section snippets

Construction and verification of the heterochromatin probes

To identify and quantify epigenetic modifications (H3K9me3, H3K27me3 and DNA methylation (5mC)), we have engineered protein probes based on a tandem repeat strategy as we detailed in our previous work [[24], [25]] and literature [[26], [27], [28]]. This tandem repeat strategy, in which adjacent repeats of the same epigenetic “reader” domain are linked via a flexible linker to form multimeric constructs (e.g. dimer, trimer, etc.), was adopted due to the enhancement in the epigenetic target

Quantifying constitutive heterochromatin (cHC) levels

A microscopy-based approach can be instrumental in examining the spatial distribution of heterochromatin associated modifications within the cell. We tested the H3K9me3 and 5mC probes in HEK293T cells (live cell images in Fig. S4 (Supporting Information), probe schematic in Fig. 1A) and observed the characteristic cHC distribution. The H3K9me3 probe is localized at the nuclear periphery [54] and around the peri-nucleolar regions forming distinct ring-like structures around the nucleolus [[55],

Conclusions

We developed a sensing platform for simultaneous tracking of multiple epigenetic features inside cell nucleus. Combinations of various epigenetic features, particularly silencing markers, will allow us to monitor and distinguish heterochromatin regions (e.g., constitutive vs. facultative) over time with and without external perturbations. The ability to perform FRET images using two probes enables us to track chromatin region with bivalent features, most likely co-exist within a single

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Conceptualization: AM, OS, JX and CY.

Methodology: AM, OS, JX, LL, AC and CY.

Validation: AM, OS, JX, LL and AC.

Formal Analysis/Investigation: AM, OS, and JX.

Data Curation: AM, OS, and JX.

Writing: AM, OS, and JX.

Visualization: AM, OS, and JX.

Supervision/Project Administration: AM, OS and CY.

Funding acquisition: CY.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [CBET-1512285, CBET-1705560 & EF-1935226]. Support from the Purdue Center for Cancer Research Pilot Grant Program is gratefully acknowledged.

References (85)

  • P. Rajput et al.

    Stimulation of ribosomal RNA gene promoter by transcription factor Sp1 involves active DNA demethylation by Gadd45-NER pathway

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gene Regul. Mech.

    (2016)
  • M.R.C. Charles et al.

    Identification of novel quinoline inhibitor for EHMT2/G9a through virtual screening

    Biochimie

    (2020)
  • J.S. Lee et al.

    Negative regulation of hypoxic responses via induced reptin methylation

    Mol. Cell

    (2010)
  • S. Kubicek et al.

    Reversal of H3K9me2 by a small-molecule inhibitor for the G9a histone methyltransferase

    Mol. Cell

    (2007)
  • S.V. Costes et al.

    Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells

    Biophys. J.

    (2004)
  • B.D. Towbin et al.

    Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery

    Cell

    (2012)
  • K.J. McManus et al.

    Dynamic changes in histone H3 lysine 9 methylations identification of a mitosis-specific function for dynamic methylation in chromosome congression and segregation

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2006)
  • A.H. Peters et al.

    Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin

    Mol. Cell

    (2003)
  • A.H. Peters et al.

    Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability

    Cell

    (2001)
  • R. Feil et al.

    Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals

    Trends Genet.

    (2007)
  • B. Lehnertz et al.

    Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin

    Curr. Biol.

    (2003)
  • Y. Jiang et al.

    Setdb1-mediated histone H3K9 hypermethylation in neurons worsens the neurological phenotype of Mecp2-deficient mice

    Neuropharmacology

    (2011)
  • R.D. Hawkins et al.

    Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2010)
  • Y. Matsumura et al.

    H3K4/H3K9me3 bivalent chromatin domains targeted by lineage-specific DNA methylation pauses adipocyte differentiation

    Mol. Cell

    (2015)
  • T. Cremer et al.

    Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells

    Nat. Rev. Genet.

    (2001)
  • N. Saksouk et al.

    Constitutive heterochromatin formation and transcription in mammals

    Epigenetics Chromatin

    (2015)
  • B.D. Fodor et al.

    Mammalian Su (var) genes in chromatin control

    Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2010)
  • I. Rajapakse et al.

    On emerging nuclear order

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2011)
  • A.R. Leitch

    Higher levels of organization in the interphase nucleus of cycling and differentiated cells

    Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.

    (2000)
  • C. Guetg et al.

    The NoRC complex mediates the heterochromatin formation and stability of silent rRNA genes and centromeric repeats

    EMBO J.

    (2010)
  • J.A. Lessard et al.

    Chromatin regulatory mechanisms in pluripotency

    Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2010)
  • S. Bartolomé et al.

    Internal structure of the 30 nm chromatin fiber

    J. Cell Sci.

    (1994)
  • S.J. Yan et al.

    Unphosphorylated STAT and heterochromatin protect genome stability

    FASEB J.

    (2011)
  • S.I. Grewal et al.

    Heterochromatin revisited

    Nat. Rev. Genet.

    (2007)
  • J.C. Peng et al.

    H3K9 methylation and RNA interference regulate nucleolar organization and repeated DNA stability

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2007)
  • Carone, D. M.; Lawrence, J. B. In Heterochromatin instability in cancer: from the Barr body to satellites and the...
  • A.H. Fischer et al.

    The cytologic criteria of malignancy

    J. Cell. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • C.L. Martin et al.

    Detection of chromosomal aberrations in clinical practice: from karyotype to genome sequence

    Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.

    (2015)
  • R. Srivastava et al.

    Understanding heterochromatin characterization through chromosome banding

    J. Biol. Sci. Med.

    (2015)
  • B. Hübner et al.

    Remodeling of nuclear landscapes during human myelopoietic cell differentiation maintains co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments

    Epigenetics Chromatin

    (2015)
  • O.F. Sanchez et al.

    Engineering recombinant protein sensors for quantifying histone acetylation

    ACS Sensors

    (2017)
  • O.F. Sánchez et al.

    Monitoring histone methylation (H3K9me3) changes in live cells

    ACS Omega

    (2019)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Fluorescence imaging of epigenetic genome modifications

      2022, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, oligomerization of MBD leads to increased affinity without loss of specificity [39]. The dimeric probe NLS-2xMBD-mCherry in combination with the histone modification recognizing probes with EGFP protein were applied for FRET analysis of different epigenetic modification colocalization in heterochromatin regions [40]. To study 5mC DNA methylation in vivo in Arabidopsis two genetically encoded probes containing fluorescent proteins were generated [41].

    • Lead exposure induces dysregulation of constitutive heterochromatin hallmarks in live cells

      2022, Current Research in Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Epigenetic “readers” with high affinity and selectivity towards targeted epigenetic marks were selected based on literature reports and our previous experimental validation work. Briefly, detection of meCpG was conducted via a probe constituted by the methyl binding domain (MBD) of MBD1 protein (Kim et al., 2014; Jørgensen et al., 2006; Mendonca et al., 2021), and H3K9me3 was detected via a probe constituted by the chromodomain of the chromodomain Y chromosome (CDY) (Mendonca et al., 2021; Fischle et al., 2008). The detailed amino acid sequence of the construct was summarized in Table S1 (Supporting Information).

    1

    These authors contributed equally to the work.

    View full text