Skip to main content
Log in

Boll-leaf system gas exchange and its application in the analysis of cotton photosynthetic function

  • Original article
  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the boll development and boll yield from single-leaf photosynthesis is difficult as the source-sink relationship of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is complicated. As the boll-leaf system (BLS), which includes the main-stem leaf, sympodial leaf, and non-leaf organs, is the basic unit of the cotton source-sink relationship and yield formation, the concept of "BLS photosynthesis" is introduced in this study. We speculate that the characteristics of BLS gas exchange can more accurately reflect the photosynthetic function of the system, thus revealing the law of photosynthesis in the process of boll development. The results showed that the photosynthetic rate of single leaves measured by a BLS chamber was consistent with that measured by a standard single-leaf chamber. BLSs exhibited typical light response curves, and the shape of the curves was similar to those of single leaves. The light compensation point and respiration rate of BLSs were higher than those of single leaves, while the apparent quantum efficiency of BLSs was lower. Compared with single leaves, the duration of the photosynthetic function of BLSs was longer. Increasing plant density decreased the gas exchange rate per unit BLS more significantly under field conditions. There was a better linear correlation between the net CO2 assimilation rate, respiration rate of BLSs and boll biomass. Therefore, we think that the gas exchange of BLSs can better reveal the changes in photosynthetic function of BLSs and boll development. This provides a new basis for analyzing the mechanism and regulation of cotton yield formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AQE:

Apparent quantum efficiency

BLS:

Boll-leaf system

Chl:

Chlorophyll content

Chla:

Chlorophyll a

Chlb:

Chlorophyll b

ChlT:

Total chlorophyll content

DAA:

Days after anthesis

LCP:

Light compensation point

LMA:

Leaf mass per unit area

LSP:

Light saturation point

MSL:

Main-stem leaf

PAR:

Photosynthetic active radiation

PD:

Plant density

Pn:

Net photosynthetic rate

Pn(BLS) :

Net CO2 assimilation rate per unit boll-leaf system

Pn(BLS).W :

Net CO2 assimilation rate of boll-leaf system per unit dry weight

Pn(BLS).A :

Net CO2 assimilation rate of boll-leaf system per area

PnG(BLS) :

Gross CO2 assimilation rate per unit boll-leaf system

PnG(BLS).W :

Gross CO2 assimilation rate of boll-leaf system per unit dry weight

Rd:

Dark respiration rate

Rd(BLS) :

Respiration rate per unit boll-leaf system in dark

Rd(BLS).W :

Respiration rate of boll-leaf system per unit dry weight in dark

SL:

Sympodial leaf

References

  • Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Fitter DJ, Hand DW, Ludwig LJ, Wilson JW, Withers AC (1978) The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: an experimental examination of two canopy models. J Exp Bot 29:815–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/29.4.815

  • Araus JL, Sanchez-Bragado R, Vicente R (2021) Improving crop yield and resilience through photosynthesis optimisation: panacea or pipe dream? J Exp Bot 72:3936–3955. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab097

  • Baker DN, Baker JT (2010) Cotton source/sink relationships. In: Stewart JM, Oosterhuis DM, Heitholt JJ, Mauney JR (eds) Physiology of cotton. Springer, New York, pp 86–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Brestic M, Zivcak M, Hauptvogel P, Misheva S, Kocheva K, Yang XH, Li XN, Allakhverdiev SI (2018) Wheat plant selection for high yields entailed improvement of leaf anatomical and biochemical traits including tolerance to non-optimal temperature conditions. Photosynth Res 136:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-018-0486-z

  • Brooks TJ, Wall GW, Pinter PJ, Kimball BA, LaMorte RL, Leavitt SW, Matthias AD, Adamsen FJ, Hunsaker DJ, Webber AN (2000) Acclimation response of spring wheat in a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 3. Canopy architecture and gas exchange. Photosynth Res 66:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010634521467

  • Carmo-Silva E, Andralojc PJ, Scales JC, Driever SM, Mead A, Lawson T, Raines CA, Parry MAJ (2017) Phenotyping of field-grown wheat in the UK highlights contribution of light response of photosynthesis and flag leaf longevity to grain yield. J Exp Bot 68:3473–3486. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx169

  • Chang TG, Song QF, Zhao HL, Chang SQ, Xin CP, Qu MN, Zhu XG (2020) An in situ approach to characterizing photosynthetic gas exchange of rice panicle. Plant Methods 16:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00633-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MZ, Zhang YL, Liang FB, Tang JY, Ma PC, Tian JS, Jiang CD, Zhang WF (2021) The net photosynthetic rate of the cotton boll-leaf system determines boll weight under various plant densities. Eur J Agron 125:126251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clement JD, Constable GA, Conaty WC (2013) CO2 exchange rate in cotton does not explain negative associations between lint yield and fiber quality. J Cotton Sci 17:270–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable GA, Bange MP (2015) The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crop Res 182:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constable GA, Rawson HM (1980a) Carbon production and utilization in cotton: inferences from a carbon budget. Funct Plant Biol 7:539–553. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9800539

  • Constable GA, Rawson HM (1980b) Effect of leaf position, expansion and age on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of cotton. Funct Plant Biol 7:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9800089

  • Constable GA, Rawson HM (1982) Distribution of 14C label from cotton leaves: consequences of changed water and nitrogen status. Funct Plant Biol 9:735–747. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9820735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu ZM, Condon AG, Saavedra AL (1998) Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Sci 38:1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060011x

  • Gaju O, DeSilva J, Carvalho P, Hawkesford MJ, Griffiths S, Greenland A, Foulkes MJ (2016) Leaf photosynthesis and associations with grain yield, biomass and nitrogen-use efficiency in landraces, synthetic-derived lines and cultivars in wheat. Field Crop Res 193:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han JM, Lei ZY, Flexas J, Zhang YJ, Carriquí M, Zhang WF, Zhang YL (2018) Mesophyll conductance in cotton bracts: anatomically determined internal CO2 diffusion constraints on photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 69:5433–5443. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery296

  • Horrocks RD, Kerby TA, Buxton DR (1978) Carbon source for developing bolls in normal and superokra leaf cotton. New Phytol 80:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01566.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu YY (2013) Photosynthetic characteristics and strategies of acclimation of non-foliar organs in cotton (Gossypium spp.) respond to water deficit. Dissertation, Shihezi University, pp 27–39

  • Hu YY, Zhang YL, Luo HH, Li W, Oguchi R, Fan DY, Chow WS, Zhang WF (2012) Important photosynthetic contribution from the non-foliar green organs in cotton at the late growth stage. Planta 235:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1511-z

  • Hu YY, Oguchi R, Yamori W, von Caemmerer S, Chow WS, Zhang WF (2013) Cotton bracts are adapted to a microenvironment of concentrated CO2 produced by rapid fruit respiration. Ann Bot 112:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct091

  • Kruger EL, Volin JC (2006) Reexamining the empirical relation between plant growth and leaf photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol 33:421–429. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP05310

  • Liang FB, Chen MZ, Shi Y, Tian JS, Zhang YL, Gou L, Jiang CD, Zhang WF (2021) Single boll weight depends on photosynthetic function of boll-leaf system in field-grown cotton plants under water stress. Photosynth Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00837-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long SP, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu XG (2015) Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes MS, Cortadellas N, Kichey T, Dubois F, Habash DZ, Araus JL (2006) Wheat nitrogen metabolism during grain filling: comparative role of glumes and the flag leaf. Planta 225:165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0338-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molero G, Reynolds MP (2020) Spike photosynthesis measured at high throughput indicates genetic variation independent of flag leaf photosynthesis. Field Crop Res 255:107866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng SB, Krieg DR, Girma FS (1991) Leaf photosynthetic rate is correlated with biomass and grain production in grain sorghum lines. Photosynth Res 28:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027171

  • Peoples TR, Matthews MA (1981) Influence of boll removal on assimilate partitioning in cotton. Crop Sci 21:283–286. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100020019x

  • Reddy VR, Reddy KR, Hodges HF (1995) Carbon dioxide enrichment and temperature effects on cotton canopy photosynthesis, transpiration, and water-use efficiency. Field Crops Res 41:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00104-K

  • Reynolds MP, Delgado BMI, Gutiérrez-Rodrı́guez M, Larqué-Saavedra A (2000) Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment I: Genetic diversity and crop productivity. Field Crops Res 66:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00077-5

  • Simpson RJ, Lambers H, Dalling MJ (1983) Nitrogen redistribution during grain growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) IV. development of a quantitative model of the translocation of nitrogen to the grain. Plant Physiol 71:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.71.1.7

  • Song QF, Zhang GL, Zhu XG (2013) Optimal crop canopy architecture to maximise canopy photosynthetic CO2 uptake under elevated CO2–a theoretical study using a mechanistic model of canopy photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol 40:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12056

  • Song QF, Xiao H, Xiao XL, Zhu XG (2016) A new canopy photosynthesis and transpiration measurement system (CAPTS) for canopy gas exchange research. Agric For Meteorol 217:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.020

  • Song QF, Wang Y, Qu MN, Ort DR, Zhu XG (2017) The impact of modifying photosystem antenna size on canopy photosynthetic efficiency-Development of a new canopy photosynthesis model scaling from metabolism to canopy level processes. Plant Cell Environ 40:2946–2957. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13041

  • Steduto P, Çetinkökü Ö, Albrizio R, Kanber R (2002) Automated closed-system canopy-chamber for continuous field-crop monitoring of CO2 and H2O fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 111:171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00023-0

  • Wang BS, Ma MY, Lu HG, Meng QW, Li G, Yang XH (2015) Photosynthesis, sucrose metabolism, and starch accumulation in two NILs of winter wheat. Photosynth Res 126:363–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-015-0126-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YX, Chen MZ, Liang FB, Tian JS, Zhang YL, Jiang CD, Zhang WF (2021) Photosynthates competition within the boll–leaf system is alleviated with the improvement of photosynthetic performance during the succession of Xinjiang cotton cultivars. Ind Crop Prod 160:113121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells RL, Meredith WR, Williford JR (1986a) Canopy photosynthesis and its relationship to plant productivity in near-isogenic cotton lines differing in leaf morphology. Plant Physiol 82:635–640. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.82.3.635

  • Wells RL, Ashley DA, Boerma HR, Reger BJ (1986b) Physiological comparisons of two soybean cultivars differing in canopy photosynthesis. II. Variation in specific leaf weight, nitrogen, and protein components. Photosynth Res 9:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu A, Hammer GL, Doherty A, von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (2019) Quantifying impacts of enhancing photosynthesis on crop yield. Nat Plants 5:380–388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0398-8

  • Wullschleger SD, Oosterhuis DM (1990a) Photosynthetic carbon production and use by developing cotton leaves and bolls. Crop Sci 30:1259–1264. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060021x

  • Wullschleger SD, Oosterhuis DM (1990b) Photosynthetic and respiratory activity of fruiting forms within the cotton canopy. Plant Physiol 94:463–469. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wullschleger SD, Oosterhuis DM (1990c) Photosynthesis of individual field-grown cotton leaves during ontogeny. Photosynth Res 23:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YL, Chen MZ, Tian JS, Xiao F, Xu SZ, Zuo WQ, Zhang WF (2019) Improved photosynthetic capacity during the mid- and late reproductive stages contributed to increased cotton yield across four breeding eras in Xinjiang, China. Field Crops Res 240:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao HS, Zhang YL, Yi XP, Zuo WQ, Lei ZY, Sui LL, Zhang WF (2017) Characters in light-response curves of canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and N in responses to plant density in field-grown cotton. Field Crop Res 203:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelitch I (1982) The close relationship between net photosynthesis and crop yield. Bioscience 32:796–802. https://doi.org/10.2307/1308973

  • Zhan DX, Zhang C, Zhang YL, Luo HH, Guo L, Zhang WF (2015) Photosynthetic characteristics after flowering and contribution of non-leaf green organs of cotton to yield under mulching-drip irrigation with water deficiency. Acta Agron Sin 41:1880–1887. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01880

  • Zhang WF, Wang ZL, Yu SL, Li SK, Fang J, Tong WS (2004) Effects of planting density on canopy photosynthesis, canopy structure and yield formation of high-yield cotton in Xinjiang, China. Acta Phyto Sin 28:164–171

  • Zhang WF, Liang FB, Chen MZ, Jiang CD, Zhang YL (2019) A device for rapid determination of photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate in cotton boll-leaf system. ZL201920325236.0

  • Zheng TC, Zhang XK, Yin GH, Wang LN, Han YL, Chen L, Huang F, Tang JW, Xia XC, He ZH (2011) Genetic gains in grain yield, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance achieved in Henan Province of China between 1981 and 2008. Field Crops Res 122:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.015

  • Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Ann Rev Plant Biol 61:235–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206

  • Zhu XG, Song QF, Ort DR (2012) Elements of a dynamic systems model of canopy photosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.010

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Research Fund for the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1803234).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wangfeng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Liang, F., Yan, Y. et al. Boll-leaf system gas exchange and its application in the analysis of cotton photosynthetic function. Photosynth Res 150, 251–262 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00856-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00856-w

Keywords

Navigation