Elsevier

Clinical Oncology

Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2021, Pages e383-e392
Clinical Oncology

Overview
Innovative Follow-up Strategies for Endometrial Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2021.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Increasing recognition of the heterogeneous nature of endometrial cancer, the excellent prognosis of low-risk cases and improvements in risk stratification offer opportunities for innovative, personalised follow-up strategies. This review article outlines the evidence base for alternative follow-up strategies in the different risk categories of endometrial cancer, cancer survivorship programmes and considers future directions in endometrial cancer follow-up, including emerging new techniques, such as the liquid biopsy, and opportunities for combining molecular and clinicopathological features to personalise endometrial cancer follow-up.

Section snippets

Statement of Search Strategies Used and Sources of Information

We conducted purposeful searches in Ovid Medline/PubMed using terms related to ‘endometrial cancer’ and ‘follow-up’, between 9 October 2020 and 31 December 2020. Reference lists and citations of relevant articles were used to source other papers and additional online sources (Cancer Research UK) were also used. Articles in English were included.

Patient-initiated Follow-up

The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative through NHS Improvement has recommended implementation of PIFU in many tumour types. The rising incidence of endometrial cancer alongside the excellent prognosis of low-risk disease (Table 1 [4]) has increased interest in such strategies. PIFU programmes aim to empower patients to take ownership of their healthcare following patient education regarding symptoms of recurrence and provides a fast track service into specialised services for those

Follow-up Strategies for Intermediate- and High–intermediate-risk Endometrial Cancer

Intermediate-risk endometrial cancer can be split into intermediate- or high–intermediate-risk disease (Table 1) [4]. In the 2019 study, only 68% of centres in the UK with established PIFU schemes offered PIFU to intermediate-risk patients [23]. Recurrences in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer typically occur within the first 3 years of diagnosis. However, trends towards a secondary peak 7 years after diagnosis have been reported [6], suggesting patients should maintain symptom vigilance

Follow-up Strategies for High-risk Endometrial Cancer

The BGCS currently recommends that all women with high-risk endometrial cancer are offered TFU or HFU for 5 years, although PIFU can be considered after 2 years if acceptable to the patient and treating clinician [18]. High-risk subgroups typically recur in the first 3–4 years after completing primary treatment, with over 70% of recurrences identified in this time [6,8]. Therefore, evidence for continuing intensive HFU beyond year 3/4 in these patient groups is lacking. In addition, most

Cancer Survivorship in Endometrial Cancer

Most women diagnosed with endometrial cancer can expect to survive their disease. Therefore, a core component of follow-up care includes providing comprehensive cancer survivorship care. Cancer survivors and their families have specific needs, which include management of the long-term or late effects of cancer treatment, psychological morbidity alongside health promotion and disease prevention strategies [36]. Gynaecological cancer survivors often have particular unmet needs related to

Future Directions in Endometrial Cancer Follow-up

The traditional follow-up model relying on clinical examination with only symptom-led imaging is presumably based on the paradigm that vaginal recurrence can be cured, whereas systemic treatments for distant disease are significantly less efficacious. However, there are heterogeneous patterns of recurrence with new salvage treatments that can potentially impact on overall survival [51].

In light of recent developments in treatment options for recurrent endometrial cancer, with radiotherapy,

Conclusions

Implementation of alternative follow-up strategies that empower patients to take ownership of their healthcare and improve the patient experience is desirable and as these are now supported by BGCS recommendations, wider uptake and confidence in such schemes is expected. Further research into patient acceptability and the oncological outcomes of PIFU in those with higher-risk disease in a prospective randomised controlled trial is still needed. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a

Conflict of Interest

ELM has served on advisory boards for Inivata and GlaxoSmithKline; received speaker fees from GlaxoSmithKline; has received research grants from Intuitive Surgical and Hope Against Cancer for unrelated work.

References (76)

  • K. Beaver et al.

    Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up for women treated for stage I endometrial cancer

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2020)
  • L. Coleman et al.

    Patient initiated follow up after gynaecological malignancy: national survey of current UK practice

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2020)
  • A.G. Shumsky et al.

    An evaluation of routine follow-up of patients treated for endometrial carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1994)
  • H. Saxby et al.

    Endometrial carcinoma follow-up: time for a change?

    Clin Oncol

    (2019)
  • S.M. De Boer et al.

    Long-term impact of endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment on health-related quality of life and cancer survivorship: results from the randomized PORTEC-2 trial

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2015)
  • C. Corzo et al.

    Updates on conservative management of endometrial cancer

    J Minim Invasive Gynecol

    (2018)
  • K.K. Ward et al.

    Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among endometrial cancer patients

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2012)
  • K.S. Courneya et al.

    Associations among exercise, body weight, and quality of life in a population-based sample of endometrial cancer survivors

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2005)
  • A. Smits et al.

    Body mass index and the quality of life of endometrial cancer survivors—a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2015)
  • V. von Gruenigen et al.

    Survivors of uterine cancer empowered by exercise and healthy diet (SUCCEED): a randomized controlled trial

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2012)
  • M.L. McCarroll et al.

    Feasibility of a lifestyle intervention for overweight/obese endometrial and breast cancer survivors using an interactive mobile application

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2015)
  • B.M. Brothers et al.

    Do survivorship care plans impact patients' evaluations of care? A randomized evaluation with gynecologic oncology patients

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2013)
  • L. Ouldamer et al.

    Incidence, patterns and prognosis of first distant recurrence after surgically treated early stage endometrial cancer: results from the multicentre FRANCOGYN study group

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (2019)
  • J.E. Lodeweges et al.

    Long-term outcome of surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2017)
  • J. Hunn et al.

    Patterns and utility of routine surveillance in high grade endometrial cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2015)
  • J. Li et al.

    Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 and CA125 on endometrial cancer detection: a meta-analysis

    Clin Chim Acta

    (2019)
  • M.C. Liu et al.

    Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA

    Ann Oncol

    (2020)
  • A.M. Bolivar et al.

    Targeted next-generation sequencing of endometrial cancer and matched circulating tumor DNA: identification of plasma-based, tumor-associated mutations in early stage patients

    Mod Pathol

    (2019)
  • S. Kommoss et al.

    Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series

    Ann Oncol

    (2018)
  • E. Stelloo et al.

    Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative

    Mod Pathol

    (2015)
  • J. Ferlay et al.

    Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods

    Int J Cancer

    (2019)
  • J. Lortet-Tieulent et al.

    International patterns and trends in endometrial cancer incidence, 1978–2013

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2017)
  • Cancer Research UK

    (2020)
  • N. Concin et al.

    ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (2021)
  • T. Ignatov et al.

    Endometrial cancer subtypes are associated with different patterns of recurrence

    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

    (2018)
  • W.A.A. Tjalma et al.

    The clinical value and the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (2004)
  • A.L. Cooper et al.

    Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer?

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2006 Jan)
  • N. Colombo et al.

    Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    Ann Oncol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text