Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Offering Philosophy to Secondary School Students in Aotearoa New Zealand

  • Article
  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper makes a case for why philosophy would be beneficial if promoted among the subjects offered to secondary students in Aotearoa New Zealand. Philosophical inquiry in the form of Philosophy for Children (P4C) has made some inroads at the primary level, but currently very few students are offered philosophy as a subject at the secondary level. Philosophy is suited to be offered as a standalone subject and incorporated into the National Certificates of Educational Achievement (NCEA) system. Philosophy has been shown to benefit students in numerous ways, including the development of their critical thinking. Critical thinking is a focus of education around the world, including in the New Zealand Curriculum, and this focus on critical thinking could precipitate a focus on philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, B. (2009). Introducing a new subject and its assessment in schools: The challenges of introducing Critical Thinking AS/A level in the UK. Presented at the Association of Educational Assessment-Europe Conference.

  • Bourdieu, P. (2012). The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities (A.C. Whitehouse, Trans.). In J. Eggleston (Eds.), Contemporary research in the sociology of education (pp. 32–46). Routledge.

  • Bowyer, L., Amos, C., & Stevens, D. (2020). What is ‘philosophy’? Understandings of philosophy circulating in the literature on the teaching and learning of philosophy in schools. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 7(1), 38–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgh, G. (2014). Democratic pedagogy. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 1(1), 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgh, G. (2018). The need for philosophy in promoting democracy: A case for philosophy in the curriculum. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burroughs, M. (2013). A different education: Philosophy and high school. In S. Goering, N. Shudak, & T. Wartenberg (Eds.), Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers (pp. 179–189). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cam, P. (2018). The Generic Argument for teaching philosophy. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, M. (2004). Philosophy in New Zealand schools: Is it possible? M.A. Thesis, University of Canterbury.

  • Crisp, R. (Ed.). (2014). Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E. (2013). Giftedness considered from the perspective of research on learning and instruction. High Ability Studies, 24(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverria, E., & Hannam, P. (2016). The community of philosophical inquiry (P4C): A pedagogical proposal for advancing democracy. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Morris (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children (pp. 35–42). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Moriyón, F., Rebollo, I., & Colom, R. (2005). Evaluating philosophy for children: A meta-analysis. Thinking: the Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(4), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. (2015). Philosophy for children: Evaluation report and executive summary. Durham University and the Education Endowment Foundation. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://v1.educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/uploads/pdf/Philosophy_for_Children.pdf.

  • Goucha, M. (Ed.). (2007). Philosophy, a school of freedom. UNESCO. Retrieved October 15, 2020, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154173_eng.

  • Hand, M. (2018). On the distinctive educational value of philosophy. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannam, P., & Echeverria, E. (2009). Philosophy with teenagers: Nurturing a moral imagination for the 21st century. Network Continuum Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B. J. (2017). Wanted: Soft skills for today’s jobs. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(5), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, A. (2018). Philosophy and the good life. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L., & Chandley, N. (Eds.). (2012). Philosophy for children through the secondary curriculum. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L., & Sutcliffe, R. (2016). Teaching philosophy and philosophical teaching. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Morris (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children (pp. 200–207). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1982). Philosophy for children. Thinking: the Journal of Philosophy for Children, 3(3/4), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1985). The role of philosophy in education for thinking. In Proceedings of conference on critical thinking (p. 41).

  • Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy goes to school. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1995). Moral education higher-order thinking and philosophy for children. Early Child Development and Care, 107(1), 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1998). Teaching students to think reasonably: Some findings of the philosophy for children program. The Clearing House, 71(5), 277–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M., Sharp, A., & Oscanyan, F. (2010). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, C., & Weijers, E. (2016). Back to basics: A philosophical analysis of philosophy in philosophy with children. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Morris (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children (pp. 83–92). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, S., & Tapper, A. (2012). Benefits of collaborative philosophical inquiry in schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 546–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Ministry of Education.

  • Ministry of Education. (2011). Social Sciences: Philosophy. Retrieved December 15, 2020, from https://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Social-sciences/Philosophy.

  • Ministry of Education. (2020). Key competencies: Why do key competencies matter? Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Key-competencies#collapsible2.

  • Montgomery, D. (Ed.). (2009). Able, gifted and talented underachievers. Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, L. (2013). Unexpected philosophers: The advantages of teaching philosophy for disadvantaged children. In S. Goering, N. Shudak, & T. Wartenberg (Eds.), Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers (pp. 299–308). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, R., & Patterson, J. (1991). Virtue ethics and Maori ethics. Philosophy East and West, 41(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D., & Robinson, K. (2005). ‘Pacific ways’ of talk: Hui and Talanoa. NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, 36. Retrieved September 20, 2020, from https://nzier.org.nz/static/media/filer_public/83/9c/839ccd89-864c-4e12-ad77-9947e73564e2/nztc_no_36.pdf.

  • Shudak, N. (2013). The need for philosophical frameworks in teacher education. In S. Goering, N. Shudak, & T. Wartenberg (Eds.), Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers (pp. 21–33). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2000). Reclaiming social capital through critical teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutter, A., O’Steen, B., & Gilmore, A. (2012). Wellbeing in the New Zealand curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(1), 111–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2014). Kaupapa Māori, philosophy and schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(11), 1270–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2020). Maori philosophy: Indigenous thinking from Aotearoa. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swota, A., & De La Hunt, M. (2020). In philosophical conversation with: Adolescents in a behavioural health unit. In A. Fulford, G. Lockrobin, & R. Smith (Eds.), Philosophy and community: Theories, practices and possibilities. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symes, C., & Preston, N. (1997). Schools and classrooms: A cultural studies analysis of education. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschers, C. (2017). A beautiful life as an end of education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(6), 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Education Endowment Foundation. (2015). Philosophy for children: Evaluation report and executive summary. The Education Endowment Foundation. Retrieved October 10, 2020, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581147.

  • Thompson, G., & Tomaž, L. (2014). That’s not for our kids: The strange death of philosophy and ethics in a low socioeconomic secondary school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(11), 1225–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K., & Trickey, S. (2007a). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Cognitive gains at two-year follow-up. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 787–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K., & Trickey, S. (2007b). Impact of philosophical enquiry on school students’ interactive behaviour. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K., & Trickey, S. (2007c). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Cognitive effects at 10–12 years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickey, S., & Topping, K. (2004). Philosophy for children: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickey, S., & Topping, K. (2006). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Socio-emotional effects at 10–12 Years. School Psychology International, 27(5), 599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickey, S., & Topping, K. (2007). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Participant evaluation at 11–12 years. Thinking: the Journal of Philosophy for Children, 18(3), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon, W. (2013). Teachers bringing philosophy into the classroom. In S. Goering, N. Shudak, & T. Wartenberg (Eds.), Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers (pp. 9–20). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009). Teaching philosophy in Asia and the Pacific. UNESCO. Retrieved October 15, 2020, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000185217_eng.

  • UNESCO. (2011). Recommendations on the teaching of philosophy in Europe and North America. UNESCO. Retrieved October 15, 2020, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002140/214089e.pdf.

  • Whalley, M. J. (1987). Unexamined lives: The case for philosophy in schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 35(3), 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, C. (2018). Deep thinking and high ceilings: Using philosophy to challenge ‘more able’ pupils. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley, P. (2018). A school of thought: Why British pupils should study philosophy. The Guardian. Retrieved December 15, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/20/school-british-pupils-philosophy.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peace Experiment, Auckland, New Zealand

    Nicholas Parkin

Authors
  1. Nicholas Parkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Parkin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parkin, N. Offering Philosophy to Secondary School Students in Aotearoa New Zealand. NZ J Educ Stud 57, 87–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00212-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00212-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation