Abstract
In financial markets, investment options are relatively fixed but may occasionally change as new securities (tickers) are introduced to the markets. Theory on exploratory behavior suggests that when new tickers are introduced, the text completion decision aid (autocomplete) can facilitate diversion of market participants from their initially intended ticker to the newly introduced ticker. We analyze whether such diversions have an economic impact in terms of transaction loss. Consistent with our hypothesis, we provide evidence that upon ticker introduction, turnover of securities that are syntactically similar to a newly introduced security is significantly reduced by 3%–5% around the starting day of trade of the new security. Autocomplete appears to have a significant economic effect on market transactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The appendix includes examples from Safeway.com, Trivago.com, Yahoo! Finance, and CNBC Finance.
The introduction of a new ticker is tantamount to the introduction of a new security. A new security is introduced into the financial markets for two major reasons: the firm becomes public (it goes through an initial public offering known as IPO) or the firm has undergone a major restructuring (such as a merger between two firms) that led to a change in its ticker (its symbol on the exchange).
There is substantial evidence that stocks are underpriced around IPO (Ritter and Welch, 2002). Thus, an investor who is subject to exploratory behavior and diverts to a newly introduced security may behave rationally.
Fatigue and boredom are closely related to vigilance and attention management (Cummings et al., 2016). While these can further foster exploratory behavior, as noted, this behavior is innate and expected regardless of whether one is fatigued.
Autocomplete became fully operable on Google in 2008 (Gomez, 2013), but was available approximately a year prior in the Google Toolbar, and was quickly implemented afterwards by other websites and portals (Baifore et al., 2010; Gomez, 2013). The first finance mobile apps which emerged in 2009 already included autocomplete (Schroeder, 2009). We later show that our analysis is robust to the consideration of the incorporation of autocomplete in systems at any point between 2007–2009.
It should be noted that other events occurring around that period are immaterial to our analysis. In other words, an event such as the financial crisis of 2008 cannot provide an explanation for effects related to syntactic similarity.
Shipman et al. (2017) urge to use the most important variables when matching observations “because the estimated score depends upon the variables included in X… theory should motivate the variables included”. If many X variables are included in the procedure, the matching suitability is reduced because differences in variables that are unrelated to the dependent (i.e., change in turnover) are minimized, but differences in the key variables that may be related to the dependent may actually increase.
The t-statistics in column (1) of Table 3 and the rightmost column in Table 2 are different because of changes in the degrees of freedom and procedure. The t-statistics in Table 2 consider that we have two samples of 793 turnovers each, while those in Table 3 consider that we have 793 differences altogether.
Huberman et al. (1998) found that consumers have a lower threshold for uncertainty at the beginning of a navigation session, when they are more likely to click on hyperlinks that deviate from their navigational path.
For example, many products from the same company begin with the same prefix, e.g., Samsung Galaxy Note, Galaxy X, Galaxy Tab, etc. and Apple MacBook MacAir, Mac Mini, etc. Obviously, the similar product name choices are a result of many different considerations. This research suggests a possible ramification stemming from such similar name choices by companies.
References
Adelaar, T., Chang, S., Lancendorfer, K. M., Lee, B., & Morimoto, M. (2003). Effects of media formats on emotions and impulse buying intent. Journal of Information Technology, 18(4), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268396032000150799
Ahn, J. H., Bae, Y. S., Ju, J., & Oh, W. (2018). Attention adjustment, renewal, and equilibrium seeking in online search: an eye-tracking approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(4), 1218–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1523595
Amin, A., Hildebrand, M., Van Ossenbruggen, J., Evers, V., & Hardman, L. (2009). Organizing suggestions in autocompletion interfaces. In: Boughanem M., Berrut C., Mothe J., Soule-Dupuy C. (Eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 521–529), vol 5478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_46
Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/314322
Arnott, D., & Gao, S. (2019). Behavioral economics for decision support systems researchers. Decision Support Systems, 122, 113063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.05.003
Atchley, P., & Chan, M. (2011). Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation. Human Factors, 53(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810391215
Bahr, G. S., & Ford, R. A. (2011). How and why pop-ups don’t work: pop-up prompted eye movements, user affect and decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.030
Baifore, B., Buttell, A. E., & Fabbri, C. (2010). Personal Investing: The Missing Manual, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
Baralis, E., Cagliero, L., Cerquitelli, T., Garza, P., & Pulvirenti, F. (2017). Discovering profitable stocks for intraday trading. Information Sciences, 405, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.013
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., & Odean, T. (2009). Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn046
Belanche, D., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2017). Understanding interactive online advertising: congruence and product involvement in highly and lowly arousing, skippable video ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.004
Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2019). Boredom as a seeking state: boredom prompts the pursuit of novel (even negative) experiences. Emotion, 19(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000433
Benway, J. P. (1998). Banner blindness: the irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42(5), 463–467. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129804200504
Berget, G., & Sandnes, F. E. (2016). Do autocomplete functions reduce the impact of dyslexia on information-searching behavior? The case of Google. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2320–2328. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23572
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/11164-000
Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and direction in thinking. Wiley.
Berlyne, D. E. (1968). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3731.25
Bialkova, S., & van Trijp, H. (2010). What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels? Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.001
Blundell, R., Meghir, C., Costa Dias, M., & van Reenen, J. (2004). Evaluating the employment impact of a mandatory job search program. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 569–606. https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476041423368
Bockstedt, J., & Goh, K. H. (2011). Seller strategies for differentiation in highly competitive online auction markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280307
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., & Hikosaka, O. (2009). Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron, 63(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.009
Bruce, N. I., Murthi, B. P. S., & Rao, R. C. (2017). A dynamic model for digital advertising: the effects of creative format, message content, and targeting on engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0117
Calder, B. J., & Sternthal, B. (1980). Television commercial wearout: an information processing view. Journal of Marketing Research, 173–186.https://doi.org/10.2307/3150928
Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1086/376800
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Minimum wages and employment: a case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The American Economic Review, 84, 772–793. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1397
Chae, I., Bruno, H. A., & Feinberg, F. M. (2019). Wearout or weariness? Measuring potential negative consequences of online ad volume and placement on website visits. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718820587
Chance, M., & Mead, A. P. (1955). Competition between feeding and investigation in the rat. Behavior, 8(2/3), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10017
Charoensukmongkol, P., & Aumeboonsuke, V. (2016). Does mindfulness enhance stock trading performance?: The moderating and mediating effects of impulse control difficulties. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 7(4), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2016.081837
Chatterjee, P., Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2003). Modeling the clickstream: implications for web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Science, 22(4), 520–541. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.22.4.520.24906
Chau, F., Deesomsak, R., & Koutmos, D. (2016). Does investor sentiment really matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 48, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.10.003
Chen, C. W. (2017). Five-star or thumbs-up? The influence of rating system types on users’ perceptions of information quality, cognitive effort, enjoyment and continuance intention. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-08-2016-0243
Chen, G., Ding, J., & Zhao, X. (2019). A lottery-preference-based explanation of realized kurtosis puzzle in Chinese stock market. Applied Economics, 51(50), 5466–5481. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1613510
Cho, V. (2010). MISMIS–A comprehensive decision support system for stock market investment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(6), 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.04.009
Cho, J., & Roy, S. (2004). Impact of search engines on page popularity. In S. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, and C. Wills (Eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (20–29). New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/988672.988676
Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2001). Market liquidity and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00335
Collins, R. P., Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). The measurement of perceptual curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(5), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00205-8
Cox, R., Kamolsareeratana, A., & Kouwenberg, R. (2020). Compulsive gambling in the financial markets: evidence from two investor surveys. Journal of Banking & Finance, 111, 105709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105709
Cummings, M. L., Gao, F., & Thornburg, K. M. (2016). Boredom in the workplace: a new look at an old problem. Human Factors, 58(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815609503
Cuthbertson, K., Nitzsche, D., & O’Sullivan, N. (2016). A review of behavioural and management effects in mutual fund performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 44, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.01.016
DDI. (2004). Faking it. Development dimensions international, Research Report Autumn.
DellaVigna, S., & Pollet, J. M. (2009). Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements. Journal of Finance, 64(2), 709–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01447.x
Dorn, A. J., Dorn, D., & Sengmueller, P. (2015). Trading as gambling. Management Science, 61(10), 2376–2393. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1979
Dorn, D., & Sengmueller, P. (2009). Trading as entertainment? Management Science, 55(4), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0962
Dunbar, N. E., Miller, C. H., Adame, B. J., Elizondo, J., Wilson, S. N., Lane, B. L., Kauffman, A. A., Bessarabova, E., Jensen, M. L., Straub, S. K., & Lee, Y. H. (2014). Implicit and explicit training in the mitigation of cognitive bias through the use of a serious game. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.053
Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Soane, E., Nicholson, N., & Willman, P. (2011). Thinking, feeling and deciding: the influence of emotions on the decision making and performance of traders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1044–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.720
Foster, F. D., & Viswanathan, S. (1993). Variations in trading volume, return volatility, and trading costs: evidence on recent price formation models. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04706.x
Game, A. M. (2007). Workplace boredom coping: health, safety, and HR implications. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710774007
Gao, X., & Lin, T. C. (2015). Do individual investors treat trading as a fun and exciting gambling activity? Evidence from repeated natural experiments. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(7), 2128–2166. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu075
Goldstein, D. G., Johnson, E. J., Herrmann, A., & Heitmann, M. (2008). Nudge your customers toward better choices. Harvard Business Review, 99–105.
Golman, R., Hagmann, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Information avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 96–135. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151245
Gomez, L. (2013). Nearly a Decade Later, the autocomplete origin story: Kevin Gibbs and google suggest. All things D. http://allthingsd.com/20130823/nearly-a-decade-later-the-autocomplete-origin-story-kevin-gibbs-and-google-suggest/
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P. Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001
Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2009). Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 549–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01443.x
Grover, R., & Fine, J. (2006, May 22). The sound of many hands zapping. Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-05-21/the-sound-of-many-hands-zapping
Gupta, S. (2015). Role of industrial psychology and monotony in financial sector. International Journal for Research in Management, 4(3).
Hariharan, A., Adam, M. T., Astor, P. J., & Weinhardt, C. (2015). Emotion regulation and behavior in an individual decision trading experiment: insights from psychophysiology. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 8(3), 186. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2141
Hartzmark, S. (2015). The worst, the best, ignoring all the rest: the rank effect and trading behavior. Review of Financial Studies, 28(4), 1024–1059. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu079
Head, A., Smith, G., & Wilson, J. (2009). Would a stock by any other ticker smell as sweet? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.03.008
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66, 1017–1098. https://doi.org/10.2307/2999630
Hinde, R. A. (1954). Factors governing the changes in strength of a partially inborn response, as shown by the mobbing behaviour of the chaffinch (Fringilla Coelehs) II. The Waning of the Response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 142(908), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1954.0028
Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7, 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092214-043752
Hirshleifer, D., Lim, S. S., & Teoh, S. H. (2009). Driven to distraction: extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news. Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2289–2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01501.x
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2004). Does animation attract online users’ attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre
Huang, Z., Liang, Y., Weinberg, C. B., & Gorn, G. J. (2019). The sleepy consumer and variety seeking. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718811334
Huberman, B. A., Pirolli, P. L., Pitkow, J. E., & Lukose, R. M. (1998). Strong regularities in world wide web surfing. Science, 280(5360), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5360.95
Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5
Jacobs, H., & Hillert, A. (2016). Alphabetic bias, investor recognition, and trading behavior. Review of Finance, 20(2), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfv060
Jain, P. C., & Joh, G. (1988). The dependence between hourly prices and trading volume. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331067
Jensen, E. T., Hansen, M., Eika, E., & Sandnes, F. E. (2020). Country selection on web forms: a comparison of dropdown menus, radio buttons and text field with autocomplete. 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM), 1–4. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM48794.2020.9001795
Jepma, M., Verdonschot, R. G., Van Steenbergen, H., Rombouts, S. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying the induction and relief of perceptual curiosity. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00005
Jin, L., & Scherbina, A. (2011). Inheriting losers. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(3), 786–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq084
Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T. Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
Karapapa, S., & Borghi, M. (2015). Search engine liability for autocomplete suggestions: personality, privacy and the power of the algorithm. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 23(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eav009
Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51(4), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003
Kim, Y. H., Sauerwald, P., & Sukpatch, K. (2021). Are you looking for special menu? An examination of variety seeking behavior for special menu (VaSM) model. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 23, 100295. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10050919
Kim, R. S., Seitz, A. R., & Shams, L. (2008). Benefits of stimulus congruency for multisensory facilitation of visual learning. PLoS ONE, 3(1), e1532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001532
Lak, P., & Turetken, O. (2017). The impact of sentiment analysis output on decision outcomes: an empirical evaluation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 1–22.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153
Li, G., Ji, S., Li, C., & Feng, J. (2009). Efficient type-ahead search on relational data: a tastier approach. Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559918
Li, X., Subrahmanyam, A., & Yang, X. (2018). Can financial innovation succeed by catering to behavioral preferences? Evidence from a callable options market. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(1), 38–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.010
Li, J., Wang, Q., Wang, C., Cao, N., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2010). Fuzzy keyword search over encrypted data in cloud computing. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 1–5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.089
Lin, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2016). Home bias in online investments: an empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Science, 62(5), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206
Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16
Liu, J. (2008). At a loss for words? Google Official Post. https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/at-loss-for-words.html
Lo, A. W., Repin, D. V., & Steenbarger, B. N. (2005). Fear and greed in financial markets: a clinical study of day-traders. American Economic Review, 95(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670095
Lothia, R., Donthu, N., & Hershberger, E. K. (2003). The impact of content and design elements on banner advertising click-through rates. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-43-4-410-418
MacKenzie, I. S., & Tanaka-Ishii, K. (2010). Text entry systems: Mobility, accessibility, universality. Elsevier.
Mann, S. (2007). The boredom boom. The Psychologist, 20(2), 90–93.
Mayer, M. (2016). (Good) Trading is boring. FXStreet. https://www.fxstreet.com/education/(good)-trading-is-boring-201608161326
McAlister, L., & Pessemier, E. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1086/208926
Michaely, R., Rubin, A., & Vedrashko, A. (2016). Further evidence on the strategic timing of earnings news: joint analysis of weekdays and time of day. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62, 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.04.002
Mitchell, S., Gao, J., Hallett, M., & Voon, V. (2016). The role of social novelty in risk seeking and exploratory behavior: implications for addictions. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0158947. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158947
Morstatter, F., Wu, L., Yavanoglu, U., Corman, S. R., & Liu, H. (2018). Identifying framing bias in online news. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204948
Nacke, L. E., Grimshaw, M. N., & Lindley, C. A. (2010). More than a feeling: measurement of sonic user experience and psychophysiology in a first-person shooter game. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.005
OptimusFutures. (2015, November). How boring is your trading? Why professional trading should be boring. Online Futures Trading, OptimusFutures. https://optimusfutures.com/tradeblog/archives/why-trading-should-be-boring.
Park, J. Y., & Jang, S. S. (2014). Revisit and satiation patterns: are your restaurant customers satiated? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 38, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.12.006
Peng, M., Xing, J., & Wei, L. Y. (2018). Autocomplete 3d sculpting. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 37(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197517.3201297
Pieters, R., Rodnrthrn, R., & Wedel, M. (1999). Visual attention to repeated print advertising: a test of scanpath theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600403
Pool, V. K., Stoffman, N., & Yonker, S. E. (2012). No place like home: familiarity in mutual fund manager portfolio choice. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2563–2599. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs075
Preda, A. (2006). Socio-technical agency in financial markets: the case of the stock ticker. Social Studies of Science, 36(5), 753–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706059543
Puetz, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2011). Overconfidence among professional investors: evidence from mutual fund managers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(5–6), 684–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02237.x
Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimum stimulation level: its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/208815
Redgrave, P., Gurney, K., & Reynolds, J. (2008). What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals? Brain Research Reviews, 58(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.007
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. The Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00478
Rubin, E., & Rubin, A. (2019). Economic Externalities of Autocomplete: Empirical Analysis of Financial Markets. International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS 2019), Munich, Germany.
Schroeder, S. (2009, March). Google finance for android. Insert stock market joke here. Mashable. https://mashable.com/2009/03/04/google-finance-android/
Shipman, J. E., Swanquist, Q. T., & Whited, R. L. (2017). Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51449
Sicherman, N., Loewenstein, G., Seppi, D. J., & Utkus, S. P. (2016). Financial attention. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(4), 863–897. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv073
Sohn, D., & Leckenby, J.D. (2001). Locus of control and interactive advertising. The 2001 Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Statman, M. (2002). Lottery players/stock traders. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v58.n1.2506
Statman, M., Thorley, S., & Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor overconfidence and trading volume. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1531–1565. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj032
Taffler, R. (2018). Emotional finance: investment and the unconscious. The European Journal of Finance, 24(7–8), 630–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1369445
Teschner, F., Kranz, T. T., & Weinhardt, C. (2015). The Impact of Customizable Market Interfaces on Trading Performance. Electronic Markets, 25(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0172-8
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
Vishwanath, A. (2004). An empirical investigation into the use of heuristics and information cues by bidders in online auctions. Electronic Markets, 14(3), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1019678042000245100
Wang, H., Yuan, H., Li, X., & Li, H. (2019). The impact of psychological identification with home-name stocks on investor behavior: an empirical and experimental investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00677-3
Ward, D., Hahn, J., & Feist, K. (2012). Autocomplete as research tool: a study on providing search suggestions. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(4), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i4.1930
Wu, F., & Huberman, B. A. (2007). Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(45), 17599–17601. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704916104
Xing, X., Anderson, R. I., & Hu, Y. (2016). What’s a name worth? The impact of a likeable stock ticker symbol on firm value. Journal of Financial Markets, 31(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2016.06.003
Xing, J., Wei, L. Y., Shiratori, T., & Yatani, K. (2015). Autocomplete hand-drawn animations. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818079
Yadav, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Marketing in computer-mediated environments: research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.12.0020
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions of the editor and the three anonymous referees. The authors also thank Fredrik Beuk, Gal Oestreicher-Singer, and Debmalya Mukherjee for their comments and suggestions on the paper. The authors are also grateful for the comments raised in discussions on preliminary versions of this study presented at the University of Akron, Simon Fraser University, and the International Conference of Information Systems (Rubin & Rubin, 2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Val Anne Hooper
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubin, E., Rubin, A. On the economic effects of the text completion interface: empirical analysis of financial markets. Electron Markets 31, 717–735 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00485-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00485-0