Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Engineering PlayWorld—a Model of Practice to Support Children to Collectively Design, Imagine and Think Using Engineering Concepts

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preschool environments offer an abundance of opportunities for exploring the physical world where children can learn engineering concepts and principles (theories or laws). Yet how teachers design motivating conditions for engineering thinking has not been fully investigated. The study reported in this paper examined how teachers and young children engaged in engineering principles over 12 months. Digital video observations (123 h) captured the daily interactions of two teachers and 13 children across two classrooms during their engineering sessions. The participants were 8 preschool children aged 4.7–5.5 years and 5 school children aged 5.5–6.4 years. Different to previous studies that focus on engineering affordances during free play, the results identify new play pedagogies that support personally meaningful engineering learning of children in preschools. The new practices, named as an Engineering PlayWorld, build imaginary situations, where children in teams act ‘as if’ they are engineers, meeting engineering problems and generating engineering solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Australian Academy of Science. (2019). Women in STEM Decadal Plan (Australian Academy of Science).

  • Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2016). Practicing engineering while building with blocks: identifying engineering thinking. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1120521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2019). Engineering curriculum in early education: describing the landscape of open resources. Accessed ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/bogiati. 12(2), 1-15. Accessed 20 Oct 2020.

  • Bairaktarova, D. D., Evangelou, A., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2), 212–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capobianco, B. B., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Success in STEM. (2019). Promoting a culture inclusion in science and engineering. http://successinstem.ca. Accessed 20 Oct 2020.

  • Gold, Z. S., Elicker, J., Choi, J. Y., Anderson, T., & Brophy, S. P. (2015). Preschoolers’ engineering play behaviors: differences in gender and play context. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(3), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2002). Learning and child development. A cultural-historical study. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2008). The educational experiment. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying children: a cultural historical perspective (pp. 181–201). New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspura, A. (2017). The engineering profession: a statistical overview (Thirteenth ed.). Barton ACT: Institution of Engineers Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippard, C. N., Lamm, M. H., & Riley, K. L. (2017). Engineering thinking in prekindergarten children: a systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 454–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippard, C. N., Lamm, M. H., Tank, K. M., & Choi, J. Y. (2018). Pre-engineering thinking and the engineering habits of mind in preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0898-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, B., Hanson, J., Bianchi, L., & Chippindall, J. (2017). Learning to be an engineer: implications for schools. London: Royal Academy of Engineers Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/policy/education-policy/learning-and-teaching. Accessed 20 Oct 2020.

  • Moore, T., Tank, K., & English, L. (2018). Engineering in the early grades: harnessing children’s natural ways of thinking. In L. English & T. Moore (Eds.), Early engineering learning (pp. 9–18). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Accessed. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Australian Industry Group. (2017). Strengthening school—industry stem skills partnerships. Final project report, Australia.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Original work published 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, “The fundamentals of defectology.” (Vol 2), (J. E. Knox and C. B. Stevens, Trans), R.W. Rieber and A.S Carton (Ed. English translation). New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishers.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research assistance for data collection in this paper was provided by Sue March (field leader), Fatema Taj Johora, and Junqian Ma and data organisation by Freya Fleer-Stout and Ainslie Holland. Special acknowledgement is made of the two teachers who participated in the study, Rebecca and Oriana. Special thanks are given to the anonymous reviewers who supported the development of this paper.

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery (ARC) Grant DP140101131 funded the study. Funds from the ARC FL180100161 also supported the refinement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn Fleer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fleer, M. Engineering PlayWorld—a Model of Practice to Support Children to Collectively Design, Imagine and Think Using Engineering Concepts. Res Sci Educ 52, 583–598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09970-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09970-6

Keywords

Navigation