Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human-like versus me-like brands in corporate social responsibility: the effectiveness of brand anthropomorphism on social perceptions and buying pleasure of brands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experimental study investigates the effects of brand anthropomorphism on humanlike brand perceptions and buying pleasure in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Drawing on two conceptual approaches to brand anthropomorphism, this research examines the effectiveness of CSR when brands are anthropomorphized (Study 1) and when anthropomorphized brands are congruent to self-concepts (Study 2). Study 1 finds that when CSR is presented by anthropomorphized (vs. non-anthropomorphized) brand messages, consumers are more likely to perceive a greater sense of warmth and buying pleasure. The mediation analysis reveals that warmth is a psychological mediator underlying the positive effect of anthropomorphic messages on buying pleasure. Study 2 finds that those who perceive high (vs. low) self-brand congruity are more likely to perceive social connections to brands, warmth perceptions, and buying pleasure. Further, these effects are more prominent when anthropomorphized brands are utilitarian products. For hedonic products, however, consumers report consistently favorable responses regardless of the degree of self-brand congruity. The mediation analysis shows that the positive effect of self-brand congruity on buying pleasure is sequentially mediated by social connections and then warmth consumers perceive toward the brands. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed with specific reference to the integration of brand anthropomorphism and CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J., K.D. Vohs, and C. Mogilner. 2010. Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Researc 37(2): 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H.-K., H.J. Kim, and P. Aggarwal. 2013. Helping fellow beings: Anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilty. Psychological Science 25 (1): 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P., and A.L. McGill. 2007. Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research 34(4): 468–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkestam, N., S. Rosengren, and M. Dahlen. 2017. Think about it: Can portrayals of homosexuality in advertising prime consumer-perceived social connectedness and empathy? European Journal of Marketing 51(1): 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernritter, S.F., P. Verlegh, and E.G. Smit. 2016. Why nonprofits are easier to endorse on social media: the role of warmth and brand symbolism. Journal of Interactive Marketing 33: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S.D. Gosling. 2011. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (9): 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, L.A., J.R. Bettman, and M.F. Luce. 2015. Feeling love and doing more for distant others: Specific positive emotions differentially affect prosocial consumption. Journal of Marketing Research 52(5): 657–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-T. 2008. To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause-related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing 25 (12): 1089–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. 2020. Strategic corporate social responsibility: Sustainable value creation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.M., and N.J. Rifon. 2012. It’s a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 29(9): 639–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone Communications (2017). 2017 Cone Communications CSR Study. Available from https://www.conecomm.com/research-blog/2017-csr-study. Accessed on August 18, 2020.

  • Das, N.L., A. Guha, A. Biswas, and B. Krishnan. 2016. How product-cause fit and donation quantifier interact in cause-related marketing setting: Evidence of the cue congruency effect. Marketing Letters 27(2): 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., C.B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen. 2010. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1): 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N., A. Waytz, and J.T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114 (4): 864–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J.E., and J.R. Bettman. 2005. Self-construal reference groups and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research 32: 378–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., A.J.C. Cuddy, P. Glic, and J. Xu. 2002. A model (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (2): 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., and S.M. Anna. 2014. Improving consumer satisfaction in green hotels: The roles of perceived warmth, perceived competence, and CSR motive. International Journal of Hospitality Management 42: 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H.M., K. Gray, and D.M. Wegner. 2007. Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812): 619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guido, G., and A.M. Peluso. 2015. Brand anthropomorphism: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on brand personality and loyalty. Journal of Brand Management 22(1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, S.E. 1993. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., R.L. Tatham, R.E. Anderson, and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R.J., K.R. Bridges, R. Nataraajan, J.T. Gump, and A.E. Carson. 2018. The impact of money attributes and global life satisfaction on the maladaptive pursuit of consumption. Psychology and Marketing 35(3): 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, J., M. Koo, and W. Hofmann. 2015. When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research 42(2): 340–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcherson, C.A., E.M. Seppala, and J.J. Gross. 2008. Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness. Emotion 8(5): 720–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H.J., and M. Lee. 2013. The effect of online media platforms on joining causes: The impression management perspective. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57(4): 439–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C.M., L. James-Hawkins, V. Yzerbyt, and Y. Kashima. 2005. Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6): 899–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Deaton. 2010. High income improves evaluation of lift but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(38): 16489–16493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamins, M.A., and K. Gupta. 1994. Congruence between spokesperson and product type: A matchup hypothesis perspective. Psychology and Marketing 11(6): 569–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn, N., S.T. Fiske, and C. Malone. 2012. Brands as international agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(2): 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessous, A., and J.-L. Chandon. 2015. Consumer-brand relationships: A contrast of nostalgic and non-nostalgic brands. Psychology & Marketing 32(2): 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketron, S., and K. Naletelich. 2019. Victim or beggar? Anthropomorphic messengers and the savior consumer sustainability behavior. Journal of Business Research 96: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., and A. McGill. 2011. Gaming with Mr. slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research 38(1): 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMPG International (2017). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. Available from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf. Accessed on August 18, 2020.

  • KPMG International (2013). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013. Available from https://blogmaterialityreporting.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/kpmg-corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013.pdf. Accessed on August 18, 2020.

  • Kotler, P., and N. Lee. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, H., M. Puzakova, and J.F. Rocereto. 2017. When brand anthropomorphism alters perceptions of justice: The moderating role of self-construal. International Journal of Research in Marketing 34(4): 851–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N., K. Aschermann, R. Ehrmann, and J. Mintz. 2005. The challenges and rewards of partnering with the private sector to achieve social marketing objectives. Social Marketing Quarterly 11(3/4): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., and D. Gal. 2011. Bringing us together or driving us apart: The effect of soliciting consumer input on consumers’ propensity to transact with an organization. Journal of Consumer Research 38(2): 242–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, D.J., and V.S. Folkes. 2017. Humanizing brands: when brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me. Journal of Consumer Psychology 27(3): 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCredie, M.N., and L.C. Morey. 2019. Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the personality assessment inventory. Assessment 26(5): 759–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melero, I., and T. Montaner. 2016. Cause-related marketing: An experimental study about how the product type and the perceived fit may influence the consumer response. European Journal of Management and Business Economics 25(3): 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, B. 1995. A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement. Psychology & Marketing 12(7): 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, B. (2008). Kraft gives Facebook users reason to share: Kraft donates six meals to hungry families for each friend a user convinces to add the application. Adweek. 3 December.

  • Myers, B., W.-S. Kwon, and S. Forsythe. 2013. Creating successful cause-brand alliance: The role of cause involvement, perceived brand motivations and cause-brand alliance attitude. Journal of Brand Management 20(3): 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X., and K. Heo. 2007. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising 36(2): 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappalardo, T. (2017). CSR: How Fortune 500 companies measure up. Skytop Strategies. 23 March.

  • Paek, H.-J., T. Hove, H.J. Jeong, and M. Kim. 2011. Peer or expert? The persuasive impact of YouTube public service announcement producers. Interactive Journal of Advertising 30(1): 161–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzakova, M., P. Aggarwal, and J. Hoegg. 2018. Brands as rivals: Consumer pursuit of distinctiveness and the role of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research 45(4): 869–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spialek, M.L., and B. Houston. 2019. The influence of citizen disaster communication on perceptions of neighborhood belonging and community resilience. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 47(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J.M. 1982. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research 9(3): 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., and C.N. Leonidou. 2013. When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research 66(10): 1831–1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2015). New report finds Fortune 500 companies a fraction of CSR spend on education. Available from https://en.unesco.org/news/new-report-finds-fortune-500-companies-commit-fraction-csr-spend-education. Accessed on August 18, 2020.

  • Wakefield, K., and J. Inman. 2003. Situation price sensitivity: The role of consumption occasion, social context and income. Journal of Retailing 79(4): 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J., and B. Song. 2017. Corporate ethical branding on YouTube: CSR communication strategies and brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Interactive Advertising 17(1): 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • William Jr., W.B., and D. Chandler. 2010. Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y., Z. Gürhan-canli, and N. Schwarz. 2006. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16(4): 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., S. Kim, and L. Wang. 2018. Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research 45(5): 953–972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrated Strategic Communication, College of Communication and Information, University of Kentucky, McVey 211, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA

    Hyun Ju Jeong & Jihye Kim

Authors
  1. Hyun Ju Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jihye Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Ju Jeong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeong, H.J., Kim, J. Human-like versus me-like brands in corporate social responsibility: the effectiveness of brand anthropomorphism on social perceptions and buying pleasure of brands. J Brand Manag 28, 32–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00212-8

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00212-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation