To read this content please select one of the options below:

What is good work in a hybrid organization? On the efforts of sequencing registers of valuation

Ida Schrøder (Department of Operations Management, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark) (Department of Social Work, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)
Emilia Cederberg (Department of Accounting, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden)
Amalie M. Hauge (VIVE ‐ The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 22 June 2021

Issue publication date: 9 March 2022

1058

Abstract

Purpose

This paper investigates how different and sometimes conflicting approaches to performance evaluations are hybridized in the day-to-day activities of a disciplined hybrid organization–i.e. a public child protection agency at the intersection between the market and the public sector.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper is based on a one-year ethnography of how employees achieve to qualify their work as “good work” in situations with several and sometimes conflicting ideals of what “good work” is. Fieldwork material was collected by following casework activities across organizational boundaries. By combining accounting literature on hybridization with literature on practices of valuation, the paper develops a novel theoretical framework which allows for analyses of the various practices of valuation, when and where they clash and how they persist over time in everyday work.

Findings

Throughout the study, four distinct registers of valuation were identified: feeling, theorizing, formalizing and costing. To denote the meticulous efforts of pursuing good work in all four registers of valuation, the authors propose the notion of sequencing. Sequencing is an ongoing process of moving conflicting registers away from each other and bringing them back together again. Correspondingly, at the operational level of a hybrid organization, temporary compartmentalization is a means of avoiding clashes, and in doing so, making it possible for different and sometimes conflicting ways of achieving good results to continuously hybridize and persist together.

Research limitations/implications

The single-case approach allows for analytical depth, but limits the findings to theoretical, rather than empirical, generalizability. The framework the authors propose, however, is well-suited for mobilization and potential elaboration in further empirical contexts.

Originality/value

The paper provides a novel theoretical framework as well as rich empirical material from the highly political field of child protection work, which has seldomly been studied within accounting research.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: The Independent Research Fund Denmark, research grant: 1329-00137B.

This paper was developed as a part of a PhD research project. The authors are grateful for the financial support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark. The authors would like to thank Jan Mouritsen, Ebba Sjögren, Lise Justesen, the three reviewers as well as the participants at IPA’s emerging scholar’s colloquium 2018 for their critical and insightful comments.

Citation

Schrøder, I., Cederberg, E. and Hauge, A.M. (2022), "What is good work in a hybrid organization? On the efforts of sequencing registers of valuation", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 917-949. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2019-4328

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles