Abstract
Sexual assault is a major public health concern in the United States that disproportionately affects sexual minority cisgender and nonbinary young adults. Although sexual assault is influenced by a myriad of societal and interpersonal factors, misunderstandings during the communication and interpretation of sexual consent signals likely contribute to this public health crisis. Unfortunately, research on sexual consent miscommunication has been heavily informed by heteronormative theories and conducted primarily with cisgender heterosexual men and women. The present study attempted to help address this gap in the literature by exploring factors that contribute to sexual consent attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors in a sample of 251 cisgender and nonbinary sexual minority young adults. Nonbinary participants reported more proactive sexual consent attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors than cisgender participants. Sexual assertiveness was also a robust and unique predictor of adaptive sexual consent, particularly among those who identified as more traditionally masculine. Findings from the current study may help guide the development of more inclusive, research-informed sexual consent and sexual violence prevention programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Another critically important area in need of research that was beyond the scope of the current paper is the exploration of sexual consent attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of transgender individuals.
Cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary/genderqueer/agender individuals were all eligible to participate in the larger study on sexual consent. Unfortunately, we did not recruit a large enough sample of transgender individuals to meaningfully assess group differences and thus we did not include them in the current paper.
References
Barrett, R. (2017). From drag queens to leathermen: Language, gender, and gay malesubcultures. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000702
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximation. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 16(2), 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
Ben-David, S., & Schneider, O. (2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6761-4
Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10
Braham, J., Skakoon-Sparling, S., Kilimnik, C., & Milhausen, R. (2019). Intimate partner violence history and its association with condom use negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 147(1), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.004
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
Carmody, M. (2005). Ethical erotics: Reconceptualizing anti-rape education. Sexualities, 8(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705056621
Cousin, E. (2019). Queering sexual consent negotiations [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Lund University. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8983181
Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(1), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Darden, M. C., Ehman, A. C., Lair, E. C., & Gross, A. M. (2018). Sexual compliance: Examining the relationships among sexual want, sexual consent, and sexual assertiveness. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9551-1
Eisenberg, M. E., Lust, K., Mathiason, M. A., & Porta, C. M. (2017). Sexual assault, sexual orientation, and reporting among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517726414
Eves, A. (2004). Queer theory, butch/femme identities and lesbian space. Sexualities, 7(4), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460704047064
Feinstein, B. A., & Dyar, C. (2017). Bisexuality, minority stress, and health. Current Sexual Health Reports, 9(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0096-3
Glace, A. M., & Kaufman, K. L. (2020). Sexual consent attitudes and rape-supportive norms among gender and sexual minority students. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12221
Goldberg, A. E., & Kuvalanka, K. A. (2018). Navigating identity development and community belonging when “there are only two boxes to check”: An exploratory study of nonbinary trans college students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 15(2), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2018.1429979
Gordon, R. A. (2015). Regression analysis for the social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748788
Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53(3–4), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
Hall, D. S. (1998). Consent for sexual behavior in a college student population. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 1. http://www.ejhs.org/volume1/consent1.htm
Hanebutt, R. (2021). Beyond the binaries of sexual consent. In A. Cooke-Jackson & V. Rubinsky (Eds.), Communicating Intimate Health (pp. 99–118). Lexington Books. https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781793630971/Communicating-Intimate-Health
Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
Hsieh, N., & Ruther, M. (2016). Sexual minority health and health risk factors: Intersection effects of gender, race, and sexual identity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(6), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.016
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Humphreys, T. (2004). Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. In M. Cowling (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 209–225). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249995.
Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706
Humphreys, T. (2013). Sexual consent scale, revised. In T. D. Fischer, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S.L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 173–176). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881089
Humphreys, T., & Brousseau, M. M. (2010). The Sexual Consent Scale-Revised: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903151358
Humphreys, T., & Herold, E. (2007). Sexual consent in heterosexual relationships: Development of a new measure. Sex Roles, 57(3–4), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9264-7
Hurlbert, D. F. (1991). The role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239108404342
James, S., Herman, J., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. A. (2016). The report of the 2015 US Transgender Survey. The National Center for Transgender Equality. https://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/USTS-Full-Report-final.pdf
Jozkowski, K. N. (2011). Measuring internal and external conceptualizations of sexual consent: A mixed-methods exploration of sexual consent (Publication No. 884637353) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/884637353/66F467786DEC4F21PQ/1
Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014a). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S., Peterson, Z. D., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014b). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7
Kachel, S., Steffens, M. C., & Niedlich, C. (2016). Traditional masculinity and femininity: Validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Kelley, E. L., Orchowski, L. M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2016). Sexual victimization among college women: Role of sexual assertiveness and resistance variables. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039407
Kelly, C. A., Soler-Hampejsek, E., Mensch, B. S., & Hewett, P. C. (2013). Social desirability bias in sexual behavior reporting. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1363/3901413
Kilimnik, C. D., & Humphreys, T. (2018). Understanding sexual consent and nonconsensual sexual experiences in undergraduate women: The role of identification and rape myth acceptance. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2017-0028
Kimmel, M. S. (Ed.). (2007). The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Vanderbilt University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1675bd1.3
Klinkenberg, D., & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26(4), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v26n04_02
Loshek, E., & Terrell, H. K. (2015). The development of the Sexual Assertiveness Questionnaire (SAQ): A comprehensive measure of sexual assertiveness for women. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(9), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.944970
Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72(1–2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1
McKenna, J. L., Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2021). Predictors of sexual consent communication among sexual minority cisgender and nonbinary young adults during a penetrative sexual encounter with a new partner. Sexuality & Culture, 25(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09831-y
McKie, R. M., Skakoon-Sparling, S., Levere, D., Sezlik, S., & Humphreys, T. P. (2020). Is there space for our stories? An examination of North American and Western European gay, bi, and other men who have sex with men’s non-consensual sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1767023
Meerwijk, E. L., & Sevelius, J. M. (2017). Transgender population size in the United States: A meta-regression of population-based probability samples. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303578
Millett, G. A., Flores, S. A., Peterson, J. L., & Bakeman, R. (2007). Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and White men who have sex with men: A meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS, 21(15), 2083–2091. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282e9a64b
Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., & Burkholder, G. J. (1997). Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.790
Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
Nagoshi, J. L., Nagoshi, C. T., & Brzuzy, S. (2014). Gender and sexual identity: Transcending feminist and queer theory. (G. Filip-Crawford, A. Varley & R. Hess III, Contributors). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8966-5
Parsons, J. T., Kutnick, A. H., Halkitis, P. N., Punzalan, J. C., & Carbonari, J. P. (2005). Sexual risk behaviors and substance use among alcohol abusing HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 37(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2005.10399746
Shafer, A., Ortiz, R. R., Thompson, B., & Huemmer, J. (2018). The role of hypermasculinity, token resistance, rape myth, and assertive sexual consent communication among college men. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(3), S44–S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.015
Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
Testa, M., & Dermen, K. H. (1997). The differential correlates of sexual coercion and rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(5), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014005006
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In J. DeLamater & R.F. Plant (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2
Winter, N., Burleigh, T., Kennedy, R., & Clifford, S. (2019, February 1). A Simplified Protocol to Screen Out VPS and International Respondents Using Qualtrics. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3327274
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 629–667). John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119
Yamamiya, Y., Cash, T. F., & Thompson, K. J. (2006). Sexual experiences among college women: The differential effects of general versus contextual body images on sexuality. Sex Roles, 55(5–6), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9096-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenna, J.L., Roemer, L. & Orsillo, S.M. Predictors of Sexual Consent Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Cisgender and Nonbinary Young Adults. Sex Roles 85, 391–404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01226-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01226-5