Abstract
Short selling strategy leads to a portfolio with significantly better risk-return structure compared to the standard approach. Moreover, investors can use risk-neutral interest rate to increase the return of the portfolio. In this paper, we study the cardinality-constrained mean–variance portfolio optimization model with and without short selling and risk-neutral interest rate. First, to avoid negative investment in stocks with no short selling position, the non-negativeness of the product of each stock’s return to the proportion of investment on it is added to the model as a constraint. Then, we further present an improved model, where instead of determining the term of the short rebate according to the proportion of the total funds invested, it is determined according to the return. Finally, all models are compared using the data set of the S&P 500 index, Communication Service.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, G.J.: Short selling and efficient sets. J. Finance 48(4), 1497–1506 (1993)
Alexander, G.J.: Efficient sets, short-selling, and estimation risk. J. Portf. Manag. 21(2), 64 (1995)
Armananzas, R., Lozano, J.A.: A multiobjective approach to the portfolio optimization problem. In: 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, pp. 1388–1395. IEEE (2005)
Bertsimas, D., Shioda, R.: Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization. Comput. Optim. Appl. 43(1), 1–22 (2009)
Bielecki, T.R., Jang, I.: Portfolio optimization with a defaultable security. Asia Pac. Financ. Mark. 13(2), 113–127 (2006)
Birge, J.R., Zhang, R.Q.: Risk-neutral option pricing methods for adjusting constrained cash flows. Eng. Econ. 44(1), 36–49 (1999)
Chang, T.J., Meade, N., Beasley, J.E., Sharaiha, Y.M.: Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(13), 1271–1302 (2000)
Crama, Y., Schyns, M.: Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150(3), 546–571 (2003)
Cura, T.: Particle swarm optimization approach to portfolio optimization. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 10(4), 2396–2406 (2009)
Dai, Z., Wen, F.: A generalized approach to sparse and stable portfolio optimization problem. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 14(4), 1651–1666 (2018a)
Dai, Z., Wen, F.: Some improved sparse and stable portfolio optimization problems. Finance Res. Lett. 27, 46–52 (2018b)
Di Gaspero, L., di Tollo, G., Roli, A., Schaerf, A.: Local search for constrained financial portfolio selection problems with short sellings. In: International Conference on Learning and Intelligent Optimization, pp. 450–453. Springer (2011)
Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N.: Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. Wiley, New York (2009)
Fernández, A., Gómez, S.: Portfolio selection using neural networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(4), 1177–1191 (2007)
Frost, P.A., Savarino, J.E.: For better performance: constrain portfolio weights. J. Portf. Manage. 15(1), 29 (1988)
Gao, J., Li, D.: Optimal cardinality constrained portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 61(3), 745–761 (2013)
Gilli, M., Maringer, D., Schumann, E.: Numerical Methods and Optimization in Finance. Academic Press, Cambridge (2011)
Grant, M., Boyd, S., Ye, Y.: Cvx: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0 beta (2013)
Gyorfi, L., Ottucsak, G., Walk, H.: Machine Learning for Financial Engineering (Advances in Computer Science and Engineering: Texts). Imperial College Press, London (2011)
Jacobs, B.I., Levy, K.N., Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio optimization with factors, scenarios, and realistic short positions. Oper. Res. 53(4), 586–599 (2005)
Jacobs, B.I., Levy, K.N., Markowitz, H.M.: Trimability and fast optimization of long-short portfolios. Financ. Anal. J. 62(2), 36–46 (2006)
Jagannathan, R., Ma, T.: Risk reduction in large portfolios: why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J. Finance 58(4), 1651–1683 (2003)
Jobst, N.J., Horniman, M.D., Lucas, C.A., Mitra, G., et al.: Computational aspects of alternative portfolio selection models in the presence of discrete asset choice constraints. Quant. Finance 1(5), 489–501 (2001)
Kawaller, I.G.: A note: debunking the myth of the risk-free return. J. Futures Mark. 7(3), 327–331 (1987)
Khodamoradi, T., Salahi, M., Najafi, A.R.: Robust CCMV model with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 547, 124429 (2020)
Kwan, C.C.: Optimal portfolio selection under institutional procedures for short selling. J. Bank. Finance 19(5), 871–889 (1995)
Kwan, C.C.: Portfolio selection under institutional procedures for short selling: normative and market-equilibrium considerations. J. Bank. Finance 21(3), 369–391 (1997)
Lai, T.L., Xing, H., Chen, Z., et al.: Mean-variance portfolio optimization when means and covariances are unknown. Ann. Appl. Stat. 5(2A), 798–823 (2011)
Li, D., Ng, W.L.: Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: multiperiod mean-variance formulation. Math. Finance 10(3), 387–406 (2000)
Li, D., Sun, X., Wang, J.: Optimal lot solution to cardinality constrained mean-variance formulation for portfolio selection. Math. Finance Int. J. Math. Stat. Financ. Econ. 16(1), 83–101 (2006)
Lintner, J.: Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. J. Finance 20(4), 587–615 (1965)
Maringer, D.: Portfolio Management with Heuristic Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Maringer, D., Kellerer, H.: Optimization of cardinality constrained portfolios with a hybrid local search algorithm. OR Spectr. 25(4), 481–495 (2003)
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1), 77–91 (1952)
Najafi, A.A., Ghasemi, H.R.: Portfolio optimization in terms of justifiability short selling and some market practical constraints. Financ. Res. J. 14(2), 117–132 (2013)
Patel, N.R., Subrahmanyam, M.G.: A simple algorithm for optimal portfolio selection with fixed transaction costs. Manag. Sci. 28(3), 303–314 (1982)
Salehpoor, I.B., Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, S.: A constrained portfolio selection model at considering risk-adjusted measure by using hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput. 75, 233–253 (2019)
Schaerf, A.: Local search techniques for constrained portfolio selection problems. Comput. Econ. 20(3), 177–190 (2002)
Sedighi, M., Jahangirnia, H., Gharakhani, M.: A new efficient metaheuristic model for stock portfolio management and its performance evaluation by risk-adjusted methods. Int. J. Financ. Manag. Account. 3, 63–77 (2019)
Shaw, D.X., Liu, S., Kopman, L.: Lagrangian relaxation procedure for cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization. Optim. Methods Softw. 23(3), 411–420 (2008)
Soleimani, H., Golmakani, H.R., Salimi, M.H.: Markowitz-based portfolio selection with minimum transaction lots, cardinality constraints and regarding sector capitalization using genetic algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 5058–5063 (2009)
Weiss, G.: The long and short of short-selling. Bus. Week 10, 106–108 (1991)
Xie, J., He, S., Zhang, S.: Randomized portfolio selection with constraints. Pac. J. Optim. 4(1), 89–112 (2008)
Zhang, S., Wang, S., Deng, X.: Portfolio selection theory with different interest rates for borrowing and leading. J. Glob. Optim. 28(1), 67–95 (2004)
Zhao, L., Palomar, D.P.: A markowitz portfolio approach to options trading. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 66(16), 4223–4238 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions and Center of Excellence for Mathematical Modeling, Optimization and Combinatorial Computing (MMOCC), University of Guilan, for partially supporting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khodamoradi, T., Salahi, M. & Najafi, A.R. Cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate. Decisions Econ Finan 44, 197–214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-020-00293-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-020-00293-9