Skip to main content
Log in

Static and dynamic quantile preferences

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper axiomatizes static and dynamic quantile preferences. Static quantile preferences specify that a prospect should be preferred if it has a higher \(\tau \)-quantile, for some \(\tau \in (0,1)\), while its dynamic counterpart extends this to take into account a sequence of decisions and information disclosure. An important motivation for the axiomatization that leads to this preference is the separation of tastes and beliefs. We first axiomatize quantile preferences for the static case with finite state space and then extend the axioms to the dynamic context. The dynamic preferences induce an additively separable quantile model with standard discounting, that is, the recursive equation is characterized by the sum of the current period utility function and the discounted value of the certainty equivalent, which is a quantile function. These preferences are time consistent and have a simple quantile recursive representation, which gives the model the analytical tractability needed in several fields in financial and economic applications. Finally, we study the notion of risk attitude in both the static and recursive quantile models. In quantile models, the risk attitude is completely captured by the quantile \(\tau \), a single-dimensional parameter. This is simpler than in expected utility models, where in general the risk attitude is determined by a function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe, F.J., Aumann, R.J.: A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Stat. 34, 199–205 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9, 203–228 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, D.: Inferring optimal peer assignment from experimental data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 104, 486–500 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommier, A., Kochov, A., Le Grand, F.: On monotone recursive preferences. Econometrica 85, 1433–1466 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C.P.: Quantiles and Medians, Social Science Working Paper, 1222. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (2005)

  • Chambers, C.P.: Ordinal aggregation and quantiles. J. Econ. Theory 137, 416–431 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C.P.: An axiomatization of quantiles on the domain of distribution functions. Math. Finance 19, 335–342 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H., Epstein, L.G.: Nonexpected utility preferences in a temporal framework with an application to consumption-savings behaviour. J. Econ. Theory 50, 54–81 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, L., Galvao, A.F.: Dynamic quantile models of rational behavior. Econometrica 87, 1893–1939 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, L., Galvao, A.F., Montes-Rojas, G., Olmo, J.: Portfolio selection in quantile utility models (2019). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3494601

  • de Castro, L., Galvao, A.F., Noussair, C.N., Qiao, L.: Do people maximize quantiles? (2020). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3607612

  • Debreu, G.: Continuity properties of Paretian utility. Int. Econ. Rev. 5, 285–293 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L., Schneider, M.: IID: independently and indistinguishably distributed. J. Econ. Theory 113, 32–50 (2003a)

  • Epstein, L., Schneider, M.: Recursive multiple-priors. J. Econ. Theory 113, 1–31 (2003b)

  • Epstein, L.G.: A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66, 579–608 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G., Zin, S.E.: Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 57, 937–969 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: Interval models for comparative probability on finite sets. J. Math. Psychol. 30, 221–242 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M.: Certainty independence and the separation of utility and beliefs. J. Econ. Theory 120, 129–136 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 18, 141–153 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Schmeidler, D.: Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple prior model. Econometrica 78, 755–770 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannetti, B.C.: Asset pricing under quantile utility maximization. Rev. Financial Econ. 22, 169–179 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochov, A.: Time and no lotteries: an axiomatization of maxmin expected utility. Econometrica 82, 239–262 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C.: Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28, 287–309 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C.: Representation of preference orderings over time. In: McGuire, C., Radner, R. (eds.) Decision and Organization, pp. 79–100. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A.: Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74, 1447–1498 (2006a)

  • Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A.: Dynamic variational preferences. J. Econ. Theory 128, 4–44 (2006b)

  • Manski, C.: Ordinal utility models of decision making under uncertainty. Theory Decis. 25, 79–104 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, H.: Quantile-preserving spread. J. Econ. Theory 42, 334–351 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis (Princeton Mathematical Series). Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostek, M.: Quantile maximization in decision theory. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77, 339–371 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E.: Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econ. Theory 2, 225–243 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzalecki, T.: Temporal resolution of uncertainty and recursive models of ambiguity aversion. Econometrica 81, 1039–1074 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P.: Nonexpected utility in macroeconomics. Q. J. Econ. 105, 29–42 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano de Castro.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors are grateful to the editor and anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions. In addition, we thank Rabah Amir, José Faro, Peter Klibanoff, Asen Kochov, Marzena Rostek and seminar participants at the University of Rochester, University of Iowa, Insper, 2019 Midwest Economic Theory Conference, and 41st Meeting of the Brazilian Econometric Society for helpful comments and discussions. All the remaining errors are ours.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Castro, L., Galvao, A.F. Static and dynamic quantile preferences. Econ Theory 73, 747–779 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01355-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01355-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation