Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

GPS satellite differential code bias estimation with current eleven low earth orbit satellites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many low earth orbit (LEO) missions have been launched recently for different geoscience studying purposes such as ionosphere detecting and gravity recovering. The onboard observations from LEO satellites provide us a great opportunity to estimate the differential code bias (DCB) which is vital for precise applications of global navigation satellites system. This paper mainly focuses on the contribution of multi-LEO combination to the DCB estimation using onboard data collected by current eleven LEO satellites from day of year (DOY) 061, 2018 to DOY 120, 2018. The single-LEO solutions with different LEO and multi-LEO solutions with different LEO subsets are compared and analyzed in detail to fully exploit the potential of LEO onboard observations in the DCB estimation. We also evaluate and discuss the vertical total electron content (VTEC) results and posterior residuals to validate the estimation accuracy. Our results show that the average DCB standard deviation (STD) values are within 0.140 ns for all eleven single-LEO solutions with the best stability of 0.082 ns for Swarm-B solution. The evaluation of multi-LEO solutions indicates that with the increase in LEO satellites, the GPS DCB stability gets improved gradually. The 9-LEO solution can achieve the stability with STD value of 0.051 ns, better than that of DCB products from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) (0.055 ns) but slightly worse than that of DCB products from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (0.048 ns). The results suggest that the GPS DCB stability based on the onboard observations of nine LEO satellites can be comparable to the ground-based solution derived from a global ground network with hundreds of stations. The LEO space-borne receiver DCB results illustrate that the inclusion of more LEO satellites can contribute to the stability improvement of receiver DCB. In addition, the VTEC estimation can benefit from the joint processing of multiple LEO observations and achieves a noticeable reduction in the percentage of negative VTEC values. Our results also reveal that the spherical symmetry ionosphere assumption might cause accuracy degradation in the DCB estimation at low latitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The LEO satellite onboard GNSS observation data are available publicly from GFZ (ftp://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/Level1b/Latest_baselines/GPSx_RO), ESA (https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/#/home) and CDAAC (https://cdaac-www.cosmic.ucar.edu/cdaac/rest/tarservice/data). The broadcast ephemeris data of GNSS satellites are from IGS (ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/data/campaign/mgex/daily/rinex3; ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/data/daily). The DCB products can be downloaded publicly from CAS (ftp://ftp.gipp.org.cn/project/dcb/mgexdcb/), DLR (ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/products/mgex/dcb/) and GFZ (ftp://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/Level2daily/Latest_baselines/TEC). Main results assessed in this manuscript can be accessed from http://igmas.users.sgg.whu.edu.cn/group/tool/9.

References

  • Aschbacher J, Milagro-Pérez MP (2012) The European Earth monitoring (GMES) programme: status and perspectives. Remote Sens Environ 120:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankey V, Anveshkumar N (2015) Design and performance issues of Microstrip antennas. Int J Sci Eng Res 6(3):1572–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt G (1990) An automatic editing algorithm for GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 17(3):199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards PG, Berruti B, Blythe P, Callies J, Carlier S, Fransen C, Krutsch R, Lefebvre A-R, Loiselet M, Stricker N (2006) The MetOp satellite—weather information from polar orbit. ESA Bull 127(127):8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltens J (2003) The activities of the ionosphere working group of the International GPS Service (IGS). GPS Solut 7(1):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foelsche U, Kirchengast G (2002) A simple ‘“geometric”’ mapping function for the hydrostatic delay at radio frequencies and assessment of its performance. Geophys Res Lett 29(10):1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friis-Christensen E, Lühr H, Knudsen D, Haagmans R (2008) Swarm—an Earth observation mission investigating geospace. Adv Space Res 41(1):210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao S, Clark K, Unwin M, Zackrisson J, Shiroma WA, Akagi JM, Maynard K, Garner P, Boccia L, Amendola G, Massa G, Underwood C, Brenchley M, Pointer M, Sweeting MN (2009) Antennas for modern small satellites. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 51(4):40–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Zhou F, Sun B, Wang S, Shi B (2017) The impact of satellite time group delay and inter-frequency differential code bias corrections on multi-GNSS combined positioning. Sensors 17:602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackel S, Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Balss U, Gisinger C, Eineder M (2016) Model improvements and validation of terrasar-x precise orbit determination. J Geod 91:547–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise S, Jakowski N, Wehrenpfennig A, Reigber Ch, Lühr H (2002) Sounding of the topside ionosphere/plasmasphere based on GPS measurements from CHAMP: initial results. Geophys Res Lett 29:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan J, Sanz J (1999) New approaches in global ionospheric determination using ground GPS data. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 61(16):1237–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan J, Sanz J, Arasgón-Àngel À, García-Rigo A, Salazar D, Escudero M (2011) The ionosphere: effects, GPS modeling and the benefits for space geodetic techniques. J Geod 85:887–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan J, Sanz J, Orus R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer S, Krankowski A (2009) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83(3):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C, Tseng TP, Lin TJ, Svehla D, Hugentobler U, Chao BF (2010) Quality assessment of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC and GRACE GPS observables: analysis of multipath, ionospheric delay and phase residual in orbit determination. GPS Solut 14(1):121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäggi A, Dach R, Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Bock H, Beutler G (2009) Phase center modeling for LEO GPS receiver antennas and its impact on precise orbit determination. J Geod 83(12):1145–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Z, Bettadpur S, Nagel P, Save H, Poole S, Pie N (2020) GRACE-FO precise orbit determination and gravity recovery. J Geod 94:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HB, Jee G, Kim YH, Shim JS (2013) Characteristics of global plasmaspheric TEC in comparison with the ionosphere simultaneously observed by Jason-1 satellite. J Geophys Res Space Phys 118:935–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Li B, Lou L, Yang L, Wang J (2016) Impact of GPS differential code bias in dual- and triple-frequency positioning and satellite clock estimation. GPS Solut 21:897–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Li M, Shi C, Fang R, Zhao Q, Meng X, Yang G, Bai W (2017) GPS and BeiDou differential code bias estimation using Fengyun-3C satellite onboard GNSS observations. Remote Sens 9(12):1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li X, Yuan Y, Zhang K, Zhang X, Wickert J (2018a) Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS. Galileo J Geod 92(6):579–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Xie W, Huang J, Ma T, Zhang X, Yuan Y (2018b) Estimation and analysis of differential code biases for BDS3/BDS2 using iGMAS and MGEX observations. J Geod 93(3):419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ma T, Xie W, Zhang K, Huang J, Ren X (2019a) FY-3D and FY-3C onboard observations for differential code biases estimation. GPS Solut 23:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ma F, Li X, Lv H, Bian L, Jiang Z, Zhang X (2019b) LEO constellation-augmented multi-GNSS for rapid PPP convergence. J Geod 93(5):749–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yuan Y, Fan L, Huo X, Hsu H (2014) Determination of the differential code bias for current BDS satellites. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(7):3968–3979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Yue X, Zhao S (2014) Estimation and analysis of GPS satellite DCB based on LEO observations. GPS Solut 20(2):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Yuan Y, Huo X, Li M, Chai Y (2020) Simultaneous estimation of GPS P1–P2 differential code biases using low earth orbit satellites data from two different orbit heights. J Geod 94(12):121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannucci AJ, Wilson BD, Yuan DN, Ho CH, Lindqwister UJ, Runge TF (1998) A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements. Radio Sci 33(3):565–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Kroes R (2003) In-flight performance analysis of the CHAMP BlackJack GPS receiver. GPS Solut 7(2):74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Andres Y, Bock H, Helleputte T, Ijssel J, Loiselet M, Marquardt C, Silvestrin P, Visser P, Yoon Y (2008) Tracking and orbit determination performance of the GRAS instrument on MetOp-A. GPS Solut 12:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Garcia-Fernandez M, Yoon Y, Schon S, Jaggi A (2009) Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites. GPS Solut 13(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P (2014) Differential code bias estimation using multi-GNSS observations and global ionosphere maps. Navigation 61(3):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Hackel S, Jaggi A (2018) Precise orbit determination of the Sentinel-3A altimetry satellite using ambiguity-fixed GPS carrier phase observations. J Geod 92:711–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhgren M, Bonnedal M, Ingvarson P (2011) GNSS antenna for precise orbit determination including S/C interference predictions. In: European conference on antennas & propagation. IEEE

  • Noja M, Stolle C, Park J, Lühr H (2013) Long-term analysis of ionospheric polar patches based on champ tec data. Radio Sci 48(3):289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid TGR, Neish AM,Walter TF, Enge PK (2016) Leveraging commercial broadband LEO constellations for navigation. In: Proceedings of the 29th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS+2016), Portland, Oregon, September 2016, pp 2300–2314

  • Sanz J, Juan JM, Rovira-Garcia A, González-Casado G (2017) GPS differential code biases determination: methodology and analysis. GPS Solut 21(4):1549–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the earth’s ionosphere using the global positioning system. Geod. -Geophys. Arb. Schweiz 59(59)

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31(9):L09607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Yuan Y, Li Z, Montenbruck O, Tan B (2015) Determination of differential code biases with multi-gnss observations. J Geod 90(3):209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wautelet G, Loyer S, Mercier F, Perosanz F (2017) Computation of GPS P1–P2 differential code biases with Jason-2. GPS Solut 21(4):1619–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan L, Jin S, Hoque M (2020) Estimation of LEO-GPS receiver differential code bias based on inequality constrained least square and multi-layer mapping function. GPS Solut 24:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue X, Schreiner WS, Lei J, Sokolovskiy SV, Rocken C, Hunt DC, Kuo YH (2010) Error analysis of Abel retrieved electron density profiles from radio occultation measurements. Ann Geophys 28:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue X, Schreiner WS, Hunt DC, Rocken C, Kuo YH (2011) Quantitative evaluation of the low earth orbit satellite based slant total electron content determination. Space Weather 9(9):S09001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakharenkova I, Cherniak I (2015) How can GOCE and TerraSAR-X contribute to the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere research? Space Weather 13(5):271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Tang L (2014) Daily global plasmaspheric maps derived from COSMIC GPS observations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(10):6040–6046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Lei J, Dou X, Yue X (2016a) Is the long-term variation of the estimated GPS differential code biases associated with ionospheric variability? GPS Solut 20(3):313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Lei J, Dou X, Yue X (2016b) Assessment of vertical TEC mapping functions for space-based GNSS observations. GPS Solut 20(3):353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Lei J, Dou X, Yue X (2016c) Determination of differential code bias of GNSS receiver onboard low earth orbit satellite. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(8):4896–4905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Lei J, Wang W, Burns AG, Yue X, Dou X (2017) Longitudinal variations of topside ionospheric and plasmaspheric TEC. J Geophys Res Space Phys 122:6737–6760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Nie Z, Xiang Y, Wang J, Du L, Gao Y (2020) Differential code bias estimation based on uncombined PPP with LEO onboard GPS observations. Adv Space Res 65(1):541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ESA, COSMIC Data Analysis and Archive Center (CDAAC) and IGS for providing the free LEO onboard data and the GNSS satellite orbits. Thanks also go to the DLR and the CAS for providing the DCB products. This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 41774030, Grant 41974027, and Grant 41974029, in part by the Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 2018CFA081. The numerical calculations have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University (http://hpc.whu.edu.cn/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Xingxing Li, Wei Zhang, Keke Zhang, Qian Zhang, Xin Li, Zihao Jiang, Xiaodong Ren & Yongqiang Yuan

Authors
  1. Xingxing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keke Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zihao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaodong Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yongqiang Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X. Li, W. Zhang, and K. Zhang designed the research; X. Li and W. Zhang performed the research; X. Li, W. Zhang and K. Zhang wrote the paper; W. Zhang and K. Zhang analyzed the data; Q. Zhang contributed to the paper writing and the data analyzes; X. Li and Z. Jiang provided valuable help during the revision of the paper; Q. Zhang, X. Ren, X. Li, and Y. Yuan gave helpful suggestions during the internal reviewing process.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keke Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, K. et al. GPS satellite differential code bias estimation with current eleven low earth orbit satellites. J Geod 95, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01536-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01536-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation