Abstract
Flowers of Canna indica (Cannaceae) are arranged in 1- or 2-flowered cincinni along the inflorescence branches. Compared with the compound branches bearing 2-flowered cincinni, the more frequent 1-flowered type have simpler structures during anthesis. The lateral cincinnus meristem (CM) has been traditionally described as terminating at the second floral meristem (FM2), which may cease development later. In this research, however, we found that the CM could produce more floral structures after FM2. When the CM was separating from FM1, the phase transition regulator CiTFL1 was expressed more evidently in the CM than in the latter. The constant expression of CiTFL1 also supports the continuous existence rather than intermittent renewal of the CM. While CiWUS, which is thought to function in maintaining the meristem, had relatively low expression levels in the secondary CM and the subsequent FM2, probably indicating the future abortion of this flower. These results suggest that CiTFL1 and CiWUS may participate in controlling the flower number of the cincinnus through regulating identity transformation and maintenance of the meristems, respectively, thus affecting the inflorescence architecture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Supplementary data to this article can be found in Online Resource 1: Primers for qRT-PCR and in situ hybridization.
References
Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu XH, Smyth DR (1992) TERMINAL FLOWER: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2:103–116
Bartlett ME, Specht CD (2011) Changes in expression pattern of the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1-like genes in the Zingiberales provide a mechanism for evolutionary shifts in symmetry across the order. Am J Bot 98:227–243
Bradley D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Rothstein S, Coen E (1996) Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379:791–797
Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E (1997) Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275:80–83. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.275.5296.80
Brewer PB, Heisler MG, Hejátko J, Friml J, Benková E (2006) In situ hybridization for mRNA detection in Arabidopsis tissue sections. Nat Protocol 1:1462–1467
Castel R, Kusters E, Koes R (2010) Inflorescence development in petunia: through the maze of botanical terminology. J Exp Bot 61:2235–2246
Goslin K, Zheng B, Serrano-Mislata A et al (2017) Transcription factor interplay between LEAFY and APETALA1/CAULIFLOWER during floral initiation. Plant Physiol 174:1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00098
Green PB (1988) A theory for inflorescence development and flower formation based on morphological and biophysical analysis in Echeveria. Planta 175:153–169
Kirchoff BK (1983) Floral organogenesis in five genera of the Marantaceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). Am J Bot 70:508–523
Kirchoff BK (2017) Inflorescence and flower development in Musa velutina H. Wendl. & Drude (Musaceae), with a consideration of developmental variability, restricted phyllotactic direction, and hand initiation. Int J Plant Sci 178:259–272
Kirchoff BK, Kunze H (1995) Inflorescence and floral development in Orchidantha maxillarioides (Lowiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 156:159–171
Kress WJ (1990) The phylogeny and classification of the Zingiberales. Ann Mo Bot Gard 77:698–721
Kress WJ, Prince LM, Hahn WJ, Zimmer EA (2001) Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the families of the Zingiberales using morphological and molecular evidence. Syst Biol 50:926–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351501753462885
Laux T, Mayer KF, Berger J, Jürgens G (1996) The WUSCHEL gene is required for shoot and floral meristem integrity in Arabidopsis. Development 122:87–96
Ma Q, Liu X, Franks RG, Xiang QY (2017) Alterations of CorTFL1 and CorAP1 expression correlate with major evolutionary shifts of inflorescence architecture in Cornus (Cornaceae)—a proposed model for variation of closed inflorescence forms. New Phytol 216:519–535
Maas-Van de Kamer H, Maas PJM (2008) The Cannaceae of the world. Blumea-Biodivers Evol Biogeogr Plants 53(2):247–318
Mandel MA, Gustafsonbrown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1992) Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360:273–277
Mayer KF, Schoof H, Haecker A, Lenhard M, Jürgens G, Laux T (1998) Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 95:805–815
Nardmann J, Werr W (2006) The shoot stem cell niche in angiosperms: expression patterns of WUS orthologues in rice and maize imply major modifications in the course of mono- and dicot evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23:2492–2504. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl125
Prusinkiewicz P, Erasmus Y, Lane B, Harder LD, Coen E (2007) Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316:1452–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1140429
Rebocho AB, Bliek M, Kusters E et al (2008) Role of EVERGREEN in the development of the cymose petunia inflorescence. Dev Cell 15:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DEVCEL.2008.08.007
Robert W (1982) Inflorescence architecture: How flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. Am J Bot 69:585–594
Rogers GK (1984) The Zingiberales (Cannaceae, Marantaceae, and Zingiberaceae) in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor 65:5–55
Rudall PJ, Bateman RM (2004) Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytol 162:25–44
Shannon S, Meeks-Wagner DR (1991) A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3:877–892
Tanaka W, Ohmori Y, Ushijima T et al (2015) Axillary meristem formation in rice requires the WUSCHEL ortholog TILLERS ABSENT1. Plant Cell 27:1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00074
Tian X, Yu Q, Liu H, Liao J (2016) Temporal-spatial transcriptome analyses provide insights into the development of petaloid androecium in Canna indica. Front Plant Sci 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01194
Tian X, Zou P, Miao M, Ning Z, Liao J (2018) RNA-Seq analysis reveals the distinctive adaxial–abaxial polarity in the asymmetric one-theca stamen of Canna indica. Mol Genet Genomics 293:391–400
Tomlinson PB (1962) Phylogeny of the Scitamineae-morphological and anatomical considerations. Evolution 16:192–213
Veit B (2004) Determination of cell fate in apical meristems. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.009
Wang B, Smith SM, Li J (2018) Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69:437–468. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040422
Weigel D, Alvarez J, Smyth DR, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM (1992) LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69:843–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90295-N
Yu Q, Tian X, Lin C, Specht CD, Liao J (2020) Expression and function studies of CYC/TB1-Like genes in the asymmetric flower Canna (Cannaceae, Zingiberales). Front Plant Sci 11:580576
Funding
This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [Grant No. 2019A1515110029] and National Science and Technology Infrastructure Program of China [Grant No. 2015FY210100].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XT designed the research. TZ, HZ, QY and XT performed the experiments. XT analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. JL coordinated all tasks. All authors participated in the revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Alexander Heyl.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, T., Zhao, H., Yu, Q. et al. CiTFL1 and CiWUS Expression Provides Clues to the Mechanism of Flower Number Regulation in the Lateral Cincinni of Canna indica, a Zingiberales Species with Variable Inflorescence Architecture. J Plant Growth Regul 41, 1800–1807 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10410-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10410-6