Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Livestock Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Water Pollution (G Toor and L Nghiem, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Pollution Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Livestock wastewater is a valuable vein of resources for the production of reused water, renewable energy, and fertilizers. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding on the opportunities and challenges to anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) for livestock wastewater treatment and resource recovery.

Recent Findings

AnMBRs that integrates a membrane filtration process with anaerobic digestion exhibit high promise for livestock wastewater treatment and resource recovery. Organic matter in livestock wastewater can be biodegraded for the production of methane-rich biogas and bioactive substances, such as phytohormones, free amino acids, vitamins, and inorganic nutrients (e.g. ammonium and phosphate). Thus, the AnMBR effluent from livestock wastewater treatment can be potentially used for direct irrigation and processed for nutrient capture, for example, by struvite crystallization. Nevertheless, there remain several technical challenges to AnMBR development for livestock wastewater treatment. These mainly include digester susceptibility to inhibitory substances, low removal of antibiotics and heavy metals, and membrane fouling. Thus, recent studies have proposed several potential approaches to address these challenges to accelerate AnMBR development. These approaches can be largely classified as wastewater regulation, microbial acclimatization, process optimization, and amender addition.

Summary

In this paper, we critically reviewed the performance of AnMBR for livestock wastewater treatment with respective to biogas production and contaminant removal. Key technical challenges and their potential countermeasures were delineated to shed light on further development of AnMBR in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Hao Y, Wang Y, Ma C, White JC, Zhao Z, Duan C, et al. Carbon nanomaterials induce residue degradation and increase methane production from livestock manure in an anaerobic digestion system. J Clean Prod. 2019;240:118257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu W, Li Y, Yuan J, Li G, Luo W, Zhang B. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for livestock and poultry wastewater treatment: opportunities and challenges. China Biogas. 2020;38:3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim H, Hong Y, Park J, Sharma VK, Cho S. Sulfonamides and tetracyclines in livestock wastewater. Chemosphere. 2013;91:888–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung J, Lee I, Han J. Biodiesel production from oleaginous yeasts using livestock wastewater as nutrient source after phosphate struvite recovery. Fuel. 2016;186:305–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dinh TTU, Soda S, Nguyen TAH, Nakajima J, Cao TH. Nutrient removal by duckweed from anaerobically treated swine wastewater in lab-scale stabilization ponds in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ. 2020;722:137854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim M, Park K, Kim JM. Phosphate recovery from livestock wastewater using iron oxide nanotubes. Chem Eng Res Des. 2016;114:119–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Ma S, Huang L, Wang S, Liu G, Yang H, et al. Two-step heating mode with the same energy consumption as conventional heating for enhancing methane production during anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2018;209:301–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Yang Y, Liu Y, Tang M, Wang R, Hu H, et al. Effects caused by chlortetracycline and oxytetracycline in anaerobic digestion treatment of real piggery wastewater: treatment efficiency and bacterial diversity. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2020;45:9222–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taeyoung K, Junyeong A, Kyung JJ, Seop CI. Determination of optimum electrical connection mode for multi-electrode-embedded microbial fuel cells coupled with anaerobic digester for enhancement of swine wastewater treatment efficiency and energy recovery. Bioresour Technol. 2020;297:122464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai W, Xu X, Liu B, Yang F. Toward energy-neutral wastewater treatment: a membrane combined process of anaerobic digestion and nitritation-anammox for biogas recovery and nitrogen removal. Chem Eng J. 2015;27s9:725–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de França AA, von Tucher S, Schmidhalter U. Effects of combined application of acidified biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer on crop production and N soil fertility. Eur J Agron. 2021;123:126224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang Y, Xie SH, Dennehy C, Lawlor PG, Hu ZH, Wu GX, et al. Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;120:109654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen C, Guo W, Ngo HH, Lee DJ, Tung KL, Jin PK, et al. Challenges in biogas production from anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Renew Energ. 2016;98:120–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Song X, Luo W, Hai FI, Price WE, Guo W, Ngo HH, et al. Resource recovery from wastewater by anaerobic membrane bioreactors: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018;270:669–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SM, Jung JY, Chung YC. Novel method for enhancing permeate flux of submerged membrane system in two-phase anaerobic reactor. Water Res. 2001;35:471–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Padmasiri SI, Zhang Z, Fitch M, Norddahl B, Morgenroth E, Raskin L. Methanogenic population dynamics and performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating swine manure under high shear conditions. Water Res. 2007;41:134–44 This article, for the first time, attempted to evaluate the dynamics of methanogens in anaerobic membrane bioreactor for swine manure treatment.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang M, Westerholm M, Qiao W, Wandera SM, Dong R. High rate anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Energy. 2020;193:116783 This article optimized the hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling during swine wastewater treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor and provided a suitable cleaning agent.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aslam M, Ahmad R, Yasin M, Khan AL, Shahid MK, Hossain S, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for biohydrogen production: recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2018;269:452–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ersahin ME, Kinaci C, Spanjers H, van Lier JB. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: integration options, limitations and expectations. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;118:89–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maaz M, Yasin M, Aslam M, Kumar G, Atabani AE, Idrees M, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: novel configurations, fouling control and energy considerations. Bioresour Technol. 2019;283:358–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin C, Bae J. Current status of the pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatments of domestic wastewaters: a critical review. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:1038–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Park M, Kim J, Lee Y, Kim H, Jeong D. System optimization for effective hydrogen production via anaerobic digestion and biogas steam reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2020;45:30188–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin Garcia I, Mokosch M, Soares A, Pidou M, Jefferson B. Impact on reactor configuration on the performance of anaerobic MBRs: treatment of settled sewage in temperate climates. Water Res. 2013;47:4853–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwon D, Bae W, Kim J. Hybrid forward osmosis/membrane distillation integrated with anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2021;404:124160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X, Hu T, Wang Z, Li X, Ren Y. Permeability recovery of fouled forward osmosis membranes by chemical cleaning during a long-term operation of anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors treating low-strength wastewater. Water Res. 2017;123:505–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim HC, Shin J, Won S, Lee JY, Maeng SK, Song KJ. Membrane distillation combined with an anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor for treating municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2015;71:97–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen C, Guo W, Ngo HH, Chang SW, Duc Nguyen D, Dan Nguyen P, et al. Impact of reactor configurations on the performance of a granular anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2017;121:131–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang H, Zhang X, Yu M, Wang Y, Yang F. Performance of anaerobic forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (AnOMBR) for dissolved gases transfer and energy recovery. J Clean Prod. 2019;235:943–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu L, Wang Z, Shu Q, Takala J, Hiltunen E, Feng P, et al. Nutrient removal and biodiesel production by integration of freshwater algae cultivation with piggery wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2013;47:4294–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Song Y, Dai Y, Hu Q, Yu X, Qian F. Effects of three kinds of organic acids on phosphorus recovery by magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) crystallization from synthetic swine wastewater. Chemosphere. 2014;101:41–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wen S, Liu H, He H, Luo L, Li X, Zeng G, et al. Treatment of anaerobically digested swine wastewater by Rhodobacter blasticus and Rhodobacter capsulatus. Bioresour Technol. 2016;222:33–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ding W, Cheng S, Yu L, Huang H. Effective swine wastewater treatment by combining microbial fuel cells with flocculation. Chemosphere. 2017;182:567–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao L, Zhou T, Li Z, Wang J, Tang J, Ruan R, et al. Effect of combining adsorption-stripping treatment with acidification on the growth of Chlorella vulgaris and nutrient removal from swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2018;263:10–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sui Q, Jiang C, Yu D, Chen M, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Performance of a sequencing-batch membrane bioreactor (SMBR) with an automatic control strategy treating high-strength swine wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2018;342:210–9 This article developed an auto-controlled sequencing-batch membrane bioreactor to advance swine wastewater treatment.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Itzel, C.N. Danay, S.S. Carmen, S.N. Arisbe, A.G. Alejandra, B .Damiá, A. Samson, M. Hafiz, P.S. Roberto, Combination of nejayote and swine wastewater as a medium for Arthrospira maxima and Chlorella vulgaris production and wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ, 2019; 676: 356-367.

  36. Lu W, Wang X, Wang Z, Yuan Z. Cultivation of Chlorella sp. using raw dairy wastewater for nutrient removal and biodiesel production: characteristics comparison of indoor bench-scale and outdoor pilot-scale cultures. Bioresource Technol. 2015;192:382–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shams DF, Singhal N, Elefsiniotis P. Effect of feed characteristics and operational conditions on treatment of dairy farm wastewater in a coupled anoxic-upflow and aerobic system. Biochem Eng J. 2018;133:186–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sivaprakasam S, Balaji K. A review of upflow anaerobic sludge fixed film (UASFF) reactor for treatment of dairy wastewater. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;43:1879–83.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshida G, Takeda N, Kitazono Y, Toyoda K, Umetsu K, Ihara I. Removal of tetracycline antibiotics from dairy farm wastewater by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes. Journal of Water and Environment Technology. 2020;18:157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Y, Kwag J, Kim J, Ra C. Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus by struvite crystallization from swine wastewater. Desalination. 2011;277:364–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Liu YW, Zhou JL, Chang SW, et al. Bioprocessing for elimination antibiotics and hormones from swine wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;621:1664–82 This article comprehensively reviewed the biological removal of antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater and thus highlighted the necessity of advanced processes.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Almeida CMR, Santos F, Ferreira ACF, Lourinha L, Basto MCP, Mucha AP. Can veterinary antibiotics affect constructed wetlands performance during treatment of livestock wastewater? Ecol Eng. 2017;102:583–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Yang Y, Hu L, Yang Y, et al. Removal of antibiotics from piggery wastewater by biological aerated filter system: treatment efficiency and biodegradation kinetics. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:70–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fridrich B, Krčmar D, Dalmacija B, Molnar J, Pešić V, Kragulj M, et al. Impact of wastewater from pig farm lagoons on the quality of local groundwater. Agr Water Manage. 2014;135:40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bu F, Du S, Xie L, Cao R, Zhou Q. Swine manure treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor with carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus recovery. Water Sci Technol. 2017:1939–49 This article highlighted the potential of anaerobic membrane bioreactor for resource recovery in the form of biogas and nutrients from swine wastewater.

  46. Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Nguyen QA, et al. Improving sulfonamide antibiotics removal from swine wastewater by supplying a new pomelo peel derived biochar in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2021;319:124160 This article provided a strategy with biochar addition to enhance the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor for swine wastewater treatment.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wijekoon KC, McDonald JA, Khan SJ, Hai FI, Price WE, Nghiem LD. Development of a predictive framework to assess the removal of trace organic chemicals by anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2015;189:391–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Do MT, Stuckey DC. Fate and removal of Ciprofloxacin in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). Bioresource Technol. 2019;289:121683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yigit E, Yurtsever A, Basaran ST, Sahinkaya E. Optimization of arsenic removal from an acid mine drainage in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Environ Technol Innovation. 2020;18:100712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mahmoudkhani R, Torabian A, Hassani AH, Mahmoudkhani R. Copper, Cadmium and ferrous removal by membrane bioreactor. APCBEE procedia. 2014;10:79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pagnanelli F, Mainelli S, Bornoroni L, Dionisi D, Toro L. Mechanisms of heavy-metal removal by activated sludge. Chemosphere (Oxford). 2009;75:1028–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:4044–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wu Z, Zou S, Zhang B, Wang L, Zhen H. Forward osmosis promoted in-situ formation of struvite with simultaneous water recovery from digested swine wastewater. Chem Eng J. 2018;342:274–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen L, Hu Q, Zhang X, Chen Z, Wang Y, Liu S. Effects of salinity on the biological performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Environ Manage. 2019;238:263–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Shi X, Lin J, Zuo J, Li P, Li X, Guo X. Effects of free ammonia on volatile fatty acid accumulation and process performance in the anaerobic digestion of two typical bio-wastes. J Environ Sci. 2017;55:49–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Li Q, Li Y, Qiao W, Wang X, Takayanagi K. Sulfate addition as an effective method to improve methane fermentation performance and propionate degradation in thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of coffee grounds, milk and waste activated sludge with AnMBR. Bioresour Technol. 2015;185:308–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Muñoz Sierra JD, Wang W, Cerqueda-Garcia D, Oosterkamp MJ, Spanjers H, van Lier JB. Temperature susceptibility of a mesophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating saline phenol-containing wastewater. Chemosphere. 2018;213:92–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Meabe E, Déléris S, Soroa S, Sancho L. Performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor for sewage sludge treatment Mesophilic and thermophilic processes. J Membr Sci. 2013;446:26–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Song X, Luo W, McDonald J, Khan SJ, Hai FI, Guo W, et al. Effects of sulphur on the performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: biological stability, trace organic contaminant removal, and membrane fouling. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:171–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Liu Y, et al. Removal process of antibiotics during anaerobic treatment of swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2020;300:122707 This article determined the removal pathway of key antibiotics from swine wastewater during anaerobic digestion.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gonzalez-Gil L, Mauricio-Iglesias M, Serrano D, Lema JM, Carballa M. Role of methanogenesis on the biotransformation of organic micropollutants during anaerobic digestion. Sci Total Environ. 2018;622-623:459–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Carneiro RB, Gonzalez-Gil L, Londoo YA, Zaiat M, Lema JM. Acidogenesis is a key step in the anaerobic biotransformation of organic micropollutants. J Hazard Mater. 2019.

  63. Liu W, Song X, Huda N, Xie M, Li G, Luo W. Comparison between aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for trace organic contaminant removal in wastewater treatment. Environ Technol Innovation. 2020;17:100564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou H, Cao Z, Zhang M, Ying Z, Ma L. Zero-valent iron enhanced in-situ advanced anaerobic digestion for the removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in sewage sludge. Sci Total Environ. 2021;754:142077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Do NJ, de Araujo M, Dos SA, Da SM, Firmino P. Redox mediator, microaeration, and nitrate addition as engineering approaches to enhance the biotransformation of antibiotics in anaerobic reactors. J Hazard Mater. 2021;403:123932 This article highlighted that redox mediator, microaeration, and nitrate addition can be potential engineering approaches to advance contaminant removal in anaerobic digestion of wastewater.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Huang Z, Ong SL, Ng HY. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res. 2011;45:705–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Odriozola M, Lousada-Ferreira M, Spanjers H, van Lier JB. Effect of sludge characteristics on optimal required dosage of flux enhancer in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci. 2021;619:118776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Lei Z, Yang S, Li X, Wen W, Huang X, Yang Y, et al. Revisiting the effects of powdered activated carbon on membrane fouling mitigation in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor by evaluating long-term impacts on the surface layer. Water Res. 2019;167:115137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang Q, Singh S, Stuckey D. Fouling reduction using adsorbents/flocculants in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol. 2017;239:226–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported under Scientific Research Project of Beijing Educational Committee (NO KM202110005016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Municipal Wasteswater Treatment and Reuse Technology, Engineering Research Centre of Beijing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

    Na Zhang, Yongzhen Peng & Xiaoye Song

  2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Wancen Liu

Authors
  1. Na Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wancen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yongzhen Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoye Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoye Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Water Pollution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, N., Liu, W., Peng, Y. et al. Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Livestock Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery: Opportunities and Challenges. Curr Pollution Rep 7, 277–285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00192-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00192-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation