Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:40:58.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN ALTERNATE PROOF OF WISE’S MALNORMAL SPECIAL QUOTIENT THEOREM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2016

IAN AGOL
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, 970 Evans Hall #3840, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, USA; ianagol@math.berkeley.edu
DANIEL GROVES
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, 322 Science and Engineering Offices (M/C 249), 851 S. Morgan St., Chicago, IL 60607-7045, USA; groves@math.uic.edu
JASON FOX MANNING
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, 310 Malott Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; jfmanning@math.cornell.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We give an alternate proof of Wise’s malnormal special quotient theorem (MSQT), avoiding cubical small cancelation theory. We also show how to deduce Wise’s Quasiconvex Hierarchy Theorem from the MSQT and theorems of Hsu and Wise and Haglund and Wise.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2016

References

Agol, I., ‘The virtual Haken conjecture’, Doc. Math. 18 (2013), 10451087. With an appendix by Agol, Daniel Groves, and Jason Manning.Google Scholar
Agol, I., Groves, D. and Manning, J. F., ‘Residual finiteness, QCERF and fillings of hyperbolic groups’, Geom. Topol. 13(2) (2009), 10431073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. and Cooper, D., ‘A combination theorem for convex hyperbolic manifolds, with applications to surfaces in 3-manifolds’, J. Topol. 1(3) (2008), 603642.Google Scholar
Bass, H., ‘Covering theory for graphs of groups’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 89(1–2) (1993), 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowditch, B. H., ‘Relatively hyperbolic groups’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 22(3) (2012), 1250016, 66.Google Scholar
Bridson, M. R. and Haefliger, A., ‘Metric spaces of non-positive curvature’, inGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 319 (Springer, Berlin, 1999).Google Scholar
Dahmani, F., Guirardel, V. and Osin, D., ‘Hyperbolically embedded subgroups and rotating families in groups acting on hyperbolic spaces’, Preprint, 2011, http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/1111.7048.Google Scholar
Gitik, R., Mitra, M., Rips, E. and Sageev, M., ‘Widths of subgroups’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350(1) (1998), 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, D. and Manning, J. F., ‘Dehn filling in relatively hyperbolic groups’, Israel J. Math. 168 (2008), 317429.Google Scholar
Haglund, F., ‘Finite index subgroups of graph products’, Geom. Dedicata 135 (2008), 167209.Google Scholar
Haglund, F. and Wise, D. T., ‘Special cube complexes’, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17(5) (2008), 15511620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haglund, F. and Wise, D. T., ‘A combination theorem for special cube complexes’, Ann. of Math. (2) 176(3) (2012), 14271482.Google Scholar
Higgins, P. J., ‘The fundamental groupoid of a graph of groups’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 13(1) (1976), 145149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruska, G. C., ‘Relative hyperbolicity and relative quasiconvexity for countable groups’, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 10(3) (2010), 18071856.Google Scholar
Hruska, G. C., Erratum to: ‘Relative hyperbolicity and relative quasiconvexity for countable groups’, In preparation.Google Scholar
Hruska, G. C. and Wise, D. T., ‘Packing subgroups in relatively hyperbolic groups’, Geom. Topol. 13(4) (2009), 19451988.Google Scholar
Hsu, T. and Wise, D. T., ‘Cubulating malnormal amalgams’, Invent. Math. 199(2) (2015), 293331.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. and Markovic, V., ‘Immersing almost geodesic surfaces in a closed hyperbolic three manifold’, Ann. of Math. (2) 175(3) (2012), 11271190.Google Scholar
Lubotzky, A., ‘Free quotients and the first Betti number of some hyperbolic manifolds’, Transform. Groups 1(1–2) (1996), 7182.Google Scholar
Manning, J. F. and Martínez-Pedroza, E., ‘Separation of relatively quasiconvex subgroups’, Pacific J. Math. 244(2) (2010), 309334.Google Scholar
Martínez-Pedroza, E., ‘On quasiconvexity and relatively hyperbolic structures on groups’, Geom. Dedicata 157 (2012), 269290.Google Scholar
Osin, D. V., ‘Relatively hyperbolic groups: intrinsic geometry, algebraic properties, and algorithmic problems’, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 179(843) (2006), vi+100.Google Scholar
Osin, D. V., ‘Peripheral fillings of relatively hyperbolic groups’, Invent. Math. 167(2) (2007), 295326.Google Scholar
Sageev, M. and Wise, D. T., ‘Periodic flats in CAT(0) cube complexes’, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11(3) (2011), 17931820.Google Scholar
Scott, P., ‘Subgroups of surface groups are almost geometric’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 17(3) (1978), 555565.Google Scholar
Serre, J.-P., Trees, (Springer, Berlin, 1980), Translated from the French by John Stillwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, D. T., ‘From riches to raags: 3-manifolds, right-angled Artin groups, and cubical geometry’, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 117 (Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC, 2012).Google Scholar
Wise, D. T., The structure of groups with a quasiconvex hierarchy, http://comet.lehman.cuny.edu/behrstock/cbms/program.html, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar