A finite deformation framework for mechanism-based constitutive models of the dynamic behavior of brittle materials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104518Get rights and content

Abstract

A finite deformation mechanism-based thermodynamically consistent constitutive framework is presented for describing the dynamic behaviors of brittle materials under impact loading. The framework is developed based upon a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient in terms of multiple mechanisms, including recoverable elasticity, crack-induced damage, and other inelastic mechanisms such as subgrain and granular plasticity. The finite deformation kinematics that captures the multiple mechanisms is structured within a thermodynamically consistent framework, and the consequent coupling of the various mechanisms is articulated. Specific constitutive equations are formulated for a Mie–Grüneisen equation of state, micromechanics-based dynamic-fracture-induced damage growth, subgrain or lattice plasticity for slip and other deformation modes, and granular plasticity for granular flow and pore collapse post-fragmentation. Using hot-pressed silicon carbide (SiC-N) as the model material, this integrative model is calibrated using available experiments that interrogate specific mechanisms. The effects of loading rate, the influence of confinement, and the path-dependent constitutive behaviors of the material predicted by the model are demonstrated. The model performance at the application scale is then evaluated by simulating previously performed sphere-on-cylinder impact experiments.

Introduction

Computational models for the responses of brittle materials (e.g.,ceramics and rocks) under impact loading are important for a variety of applications in geology, planetary science, and structural engineering. Traditionally, phenomenological models have been popular due to their computational efficiency and robustness when used for large scale simulations. Examples include the JH-1, JH-2, and JHB models byHolmquist and Johnson, 2002, Holmquist and Johnson, 2005 and Johnson and Holmquist (1994) for ceramics, glass, and other brittle materials, and the Kayenta model byBrannon et al. (2009) for rock and rock-like engineered materials. Although widely used, such phenomenological models (a) suffer from a lack of predictive ability when used outside of the loading scenarios against which they are calibrated, (b) suffer from a lack of experimental data that can be used for calibration, and (c) cannot be used to design new materials, and must be recalibrated every time that there are changes in the material microstructure. We focus here on developing a physics-based or mechanism-based model that is built upon specific mechanisms and that permits high-fidelity computational simulations of complex impact problems once the material itself has been characterized. Such physics-based models have the disadvantage of being relatively expensive from a computational viewpoint, but have the advantages of being able to address a wide range of loading conditions with a single parameterization of the material microstructure and of providing guidance to the development of improved materials (i.e.,materials design). For example, constitutive models based on the micromechanics of crack nucleation and growth(Basista and Gross, 1998, Chen and Ravichandran, 2000, Huang and Subhash, 2003, Deshpande and Evans, 2008, Hu et al., 2015, Bhat et al., 2012, Tonge and Ramesh, 2016) have been shown to be useful for providing insights into experimental observations and guidelines for material design.

The typical physical processes (“mechanisms”) involved in the dynamic deformation and failure of brittle materials are summarized in Fig.1, with the baseline behavior represented by elasticity and the equation of state. Broadly, these mechanisms include fracture, plasticity (including so-called quasiplasticity mechanisms like amorphization), granular flow, and porosity evolution (both pore generation and pore compaction).

The most striking feature of brittle materials is the presence of flaws or defects, which work as stress concentrators and usually lead to failure initiation when stressed. Several micromechanics models for failure under compressive loading are in common use for both slit-like defects(Ashby et al., 1986, Horii and Nemat-Nasser, 1986) and pore-like defects (Sammis and Ashby, 1986, Katcoff and Graham-Brady, 2014). Fracture processes are often considered collectively in the sense of damage, and damage evolution is typically described in terms of the evolution of the number and size of cracks and pores. Approaches based on the effective medium method such asBudiansky and O’Connell, 1976, Kachanov, 1980 and Grechka and Kachanov (2006) or energy arguments such as(Basista and Gross, 1998, Deshpande and Evans, 2008, Bhat et al., 2012) have been proposed to describe the effect of such damage on the elasticity. These fracture processes, and as a consequence damage processes, can be directly linked to the defect populations within the material, e.g.Ramesh et al. (2015).

Impact problems often involve both high confining pressures and high strain rate deformations. Under such conditions, various inelastic deformation mechanisms have been observed(LaSalvia and McCauley, 2010). The development of advanced material characterization techniques makes it possible to observe various inelastic deformation mechanisms in ceramics, including amorphization(Chen et al., 2003), slip(Hirsch et al., 2018), twinning(Chen et al., 2006), and phase transformations(Ueno et al., 1992). For instance,Heard and Cline (1980) observed a brittle-to-ductile transition in BeO and AlN ceramics under highly confined quasi-static compression and identified slip by dislocation generation and motion as the activated mechanism at high pressure. Similarly,Vajdova et al. (2012) observed that twinning is operative in hydrostatically and triaxially compressed limestone. Traces of dislocation slip and stacking faults have been also found in various ceramics such as AlON(Paliwal et al., 2008) and SiC(Shih et al., 2000) under dynamic compression. Such inelastic deformation mechanisms have been also found in brittle solids under shock compression. Insensitivity of the shear strength to pressure was observed in AlN and Al2O3 subjected to shock loading, suggesting similar plastic deformation mechanisms(Grady, 1998, Rosenberg et al., 1991, Kipp and Grady, 1994, Chen et al., 2006). Similarly, the splitting of the shock-wave front into an elastic precursor and a plastic compressive wave has been observed in granite(Yuan and Prakash, 2013).

Such observations demonstrate that it is important to incorporate these inelastic mechanisms in physics-based constitutive formulations to allow modeling of the inelastic responses of brittle solids in the high strain rate and high pressure regime. Depending on the applications, melting, vaporization and other phase transformation phenomena may also need to be modeled(Jutzi et al., 2015).

In addition, microcracking and other damaging processes lead eventually to fragmentation and comminution of the brittle solid into a granular material(Hogan et al., 2017). The mechanics of granular materials has been widely studied in the civil engineering community and has been also considered within impact problems(Curran et al., 1993, Deshpande et al., 2011, Tonge and Ramesh, 2016, Jutzi et al., 2015, Bažant and Caner, 2013). Frictional sliding between fragments and particle rotations(Curran et al., 1993, Zhai et al., 2019) accompanied by competition between dilatancy and pore compaction results in granular flow, and this provides a mechanism for large scale deformations and the significant energy dissipation during an impact event. The associated dilatancy and pore-collapse during compression-shear loading also changes the pressure on the surrounding material(Curran et al., 1993).

Lattice plasticity, non-statistical damage mechanics and granular flow were incorporated in a small-strain formulation byDeshpande et al. (2011), which is an excellent example of a mechanism-based formulation. However, the statistical distributions of defects in ceramics dominate their behavior, and finite deformation kinematics and the corresponding couplings must also be incorporated in order to address the response during a high speed and high pressure impact event(Meyers, 1994).

The mechanisms activated during dynamic impact are also often intertwined (for instance, microcracking can lead to the elevation of local stresses(Horii and Nemat-Nasser, 1986) and reduce the effective area for plastic deformation(Park and Voyiadjis, 1998)). The evolution of the inelastic mechanisms may also induce additional damage resulting from slip band-nucleated cleavage(Lankford et al., 1998) or sliding along amorphization bands(Zeng et al., 2019a). In prior efforts(Zeng et al., 2019a), we have incorporated amorphization, damage and granular flow into a mechanism-based formulation, but the important mechanism of dislocation-based plasticity and its coupling with the other mechanisms during finite deformations has not been integrated into such models.

In this work, we develop a thermodynamically consistent finite deformation framework to incorporate these mechanisms and the effect of mechanism coupling into constitutive formulations for brittle solids under impact loading. The paper is structured as follows. The modeling framework that incorporates finite deformation kinematics and thermodynamic consistency is first presented. The framework description is followed by a detailed development of the material model including the constitutive formulations for elasticity and equation of state, microcrack-informed damage, subgrain plasticity, and granular plasticity. Note that we limit our discussion to the most commonly observed mechanisms for brittle materials under dynamic impact, but the framework and process is general. In addition, given the trade-off between computational efficiency and fidelity, we ensure that key physical mechanisms are captured but allow phenomenological descriptions of specific mechanisms when necessary. We then demonstrate the modeling framework by considering a specific advanced ceramic known as SiC-N, a hot-pressed silicon carbide that is used in impact applications. The model parameters are identified and calibrated using existing primary laboratory measurements on the material. The calibrated mechanism-based model is then used to demonstrate the ability of the model to capture various responses including shock response, and rate-, pressure-, and path-dependence. Finally, the model performance at the application scale is evaluated by simulating a complex impact experiment.

Section snippets

Multiplicative decomposition

Consider the deformation gradient tensor F as a two-point mapping between the reference configuration 0 and the current configuration t. If a material under the deformation described by F undergoes inelastic irreversible processes, it is possible to introduce the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient following the classic finite hyperelasto-plasticity  F=FeFpwhere Fe describes the elastic deformation and Fp can be attributed to the inelastic processes, given the

Specific constitutive models

Specific constitutive formulations for brittle materials evincing elastic deformation, damage, plasticity, and granular flow are presented in this section within this framework. We articulate the additive split of the free energy density into an elastic ψe and a hardening component ψh, i.e.:  ρ̃ψ(C̃e,C̃d,w,θ)=ρ̃ψe(C̃e,C̃d,θ)+ρ̃ψh(w,θ)Oñor  ρ̄ψ(C̄e,b̄d,w,θ)=ρ̄ψe(C̄e,b̄d,θ)+ρ̄ψh(w,θ)On̄Here it is assumed that the damage only influences the elastic part of the free energy. This assumption has

Summary of model and parameter identification

This multi-mechanism constitutive model is developed within a thermodynamically consistent finite deformation framework and appropriate coupling of the mechanisms through the finite deformation kinematics. In particular, in addition to the equation of state, the mechanisms considered in the current work include microcracking, subgrain/lattice plasticity, and granular plasticity. The activation and evolution of the specific mechanisms are determined mainly by the multi-axial stress state, the

Material point response

The response of a single material point predicted by the constitutive model with the model parameters listed in Table1 is presented in this section so as to demonstrate the characteristics of the model. This allows us (1) to calibrate the parameters related to flaw distribution and microcracking by comparing the numerically predicted strengths of the material with the experimental data (quasi-static and dynamic Kolsky tests); (2) to demonstrate the model capacity of capturing rate-dependent,

Calibration and validation of subgrain plasticity using plate impact data

The plate impact experiments on SiC-N conducted byVogler et al. (2006) are used to calibrate (using one type of experiment) and validate (using a different type of experiment) our subgrain plasticity model. The EOS properties of the investigated material were also extracted from the plate impact data.

Path-dependent constitutive behaviors in this multi-mechanism model

The material responses of the model material (SiC-N) are presented under selected loading paths to demonstrate the path-dependent constitutive behaviors predicted by this calibrated and validated multi-mechanism model. Four loading paths are explored. As shown in Fig.12, depending on the damage accumulated during the early loading history, different loading paths should intercept different yield envelopes due to the effect of coupling between the damage and the subgrain plasticity models.

In the

Simulations of sphere-on-cylinder impact

To demonstrate the performance of the integrative model in application scale problems, we perform simulations of sphere-on-cylinder impact experiments. Since the sphere-on-cylinder impact experiment – involving rapidly changing complex stress states – is an idealized representation of impact problems in many real world applications, it has been used to examine the ballistic performance of various engineered materials, to investigate the inelastic mechanisms and mechanisms interaction during

Closing remarks

The constitutive formulation presented in this work is aimed at modeling the dynamic mechanical response of brittle materials under high strain rate or high pressure loading in which limited plasticity is not negligible. Similar to its predecessors(Tonge and Ramesh, 2016, Zeng et al., 2019a), the presented model adopts the physics-based or mechanism-based strategy integrating multiple mechanisms and their interaction typical of complex impact problems. Comparing to the phenomenological

Summary

A finite deformation thermodynamically consistent constitutive framework for brittle materials has been developed that properly integrates the multiple operative mechanisms activated under dynamic impact. Constitutive equations for a Mie–Grüneisen equation of state, microcracking-induced damage, subgrain plasticity, and granular plasticity are formulated into this integrative model, which should be of interest for modeling brittle materials that have limited but non-zero plasticity. The main

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory, USA and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-12-2-0022. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright

References (106)

  • BudianskyB. et al.

    Elastic moduli of a cracked solid

    Int. J. Solids Struct.

    (1976)
  • CarolI. et al.

    On the formulation of anisotropic elastic degradation. I. Theory based on a pseudo-logarithmic damage tensor rate

    Int. J. Solids Struct.

    (2001)
  • ClaytonJ.D. et al.

    Anholonomic configuration spaces and metric tensors in finite elastoplasticity

    Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.

    (2004)
  • CurranD. et al.

    Micromechanical model for comminution and granular flow of brittle material under high strain rate application to penetration of ceramic targets

    Int. J. Impact Eng.

    (1993)
  • DeshpandeV. et al.

    Inelastic deformation and energy dissipation in ceramics: a mechanism-based constitutive model

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2008)
  • EkhM. et al.

    A model framework for anisotropic damage coupled to crystal (visco) plasticity

    Int. J. Plast.

    (2004)
  • FishJ. et al.

    Finite deformation plasticity based on the additive split of the rate of deformation and hyperelasticity

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (2000)
  • FreundL.

    Crack propagation in an elastic solid subjected to general loading—II. Non-uniform rate of extension

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (1972)
  • GradyD.

    Shock-wave compression of brittle solids

    Mech. Mater.

    (1998)
  • HansenN. et al.

    A thermodynamically consistent framework for theories of elastoplasticity coupled with damage

    Int. J. Solids Struct.

    (1994)
  • HayunS. et al.

    Microstructure and mechanical properties of silicon carbide processed by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS)

    Ceram. Int.

    (2012)
  • HeeresO.M. et al.

    A comparison between the Perzyna viscoplastic model and the consistency viscoplastic model

    Eur. J. Mech. A Solids

    (2002)
  • HerboldE. et al.

    A thermomechanical breakage model for shock-loaded granular media

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2020)
  • HoganJ.D. et al.

    Fragmentation of an advanced ceramic under ballistic impact: mechanisms and microstructure

    Int. J. Impact Eng.

    (2017)
  • HuG. et al.

    Mechanisms of dynamic deformation and dynamic failure in aluminum nitride

    Acta Mater.

    (2012)
  • HuG. et al.

    A 3D mechanistic model for brittle materials containing evolving flaw distributions under dynamic multiaxial loading

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2015)
  • HuangC. et al.

    Influence of lateral confinement on dynamic damage evolution during uniaxial compressive response of brittle solids

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2003)
  • ItskovM.

    On the application of the additive decomposition of generalized strain measures in large strain plasticity

    Mech. Res. Commun.

    (2004)
  • JohnsonG.R. et al.

    Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures

    Eng. Fract. Mech.

    (1985)
  • KatcoffC. et al.

    Modeling dynamic brittle behavior of materials with circular flaws or pores

    Int. J. Solids Struct.

    (2014)
  • KimberleyJ. et al.

    A scaling law for the dynamic strength of brittle solids

    Acta Mater.

    (2013)
  • KrimskyE. et al.

    Quantification of damage and its effects on the compressive strength of an advanced ceramic

    Eng. Fract. Mech.

    (2019)
  • LankfordJ. et al.

    The role of plasticity as a limiting factor in the compressive failure of high strength ceramics

    Mech. Mater.

    (1998)
  • LemaitreJ.

    Coupled elasto-plasticity and damage constitutive equations

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (1985)
  • MenzelA. et al.

    A framework for multiplicative elastoplasticity with kinematic hardening coupled to anisotropic damage

    Int. J. Plast.

    (2005)
  • PaliwalB. et al.

    An interacting micro-crack damage model for failure of brittle materials under compression

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2008)
  • RameshK.T. et al.

    A review of mechanisms and models for dynamic failure, strength, and fragmentation

    Planet. Space Sci.

    (2015)
  • SammisC. et al.

    The failure of brittle porous solids under compressive stress states

    Acta Metall.

    (1986)
  • SarvaS. et al.

    Dynamic compressive strength of silicon carbide under uniaxial compression

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2001)
  • ShihC. et al.

    High-strain-rate deformation of granular silicon carbide

    Acta Mater.

    (1998)
  • ShihC. et al.

    Damage evolution in dynamic deformation of silicon carbide

    Acta Mater.

    (2000)
  • SteinmannP.

    Views on multiplicative elastoplasticity and the continuum theory of dislocations

    Internat. J. Engrg. Sci.

    (1996)
  • SteinmannP. et al.

    A framework for geometrically nonlinear continuum damage mechanics

    Internat. J. Engrg. Sci.

    (1998)
  • TongeA.L. et al.

    Multi-scale defect interactions in high-rate brittle material failure. Part I: Model formulation and application to ALON

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (2016)
  • VajdovaV. et al.

    Micromechanics of inelastic compaction in two allochemical limestones

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2012)
  • VoyiadjisG.Z. et al.

    The kinematics of damage for finite-strain elasto-plastic solids

    Internat. J. Engrg. Sci.

    (1999)
  • VoyiadjisG.Z. et al.

    Anisotropic damage–plasticity model for concrete

    Int. J. Plast.

    (2008)
  • BakasM. et al.

    Relationship between defects and dynamic failure in silicon carbide

  • BartkowskiP. et al.

    Porosity Effects on the Elastic Constants of Five Varieties of Silicon Carbide CeramicTechnical Report

    (2001)
  • BažantZ.P. et al.

    Comminution of solids caused by kinetic energy of high shear strain rate, with implications for impact, shock, and shale fracturing

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (8)

    • High-velocity impact study of an advanced ceramic using finite element model coupling with a machine learning approach

      2023, Ceramics International
      Citation Excerpt :

      From Fig. 8(a)–(d), it is observed that the model reasonably captures the shock profile from Grady and Moody [22], with some differences noted in the stage (1–2) up to HEL and the plateau at peak velocity, where differences likely stem from the numerically-introduced artificial viscosity in the SPH framework [27]. The experimental results are reasonably validated when compared with other such approaches made in the literature [21], where it has been observed that impact velocity does not greatly affect the HEL [62,63], and increasing impact velocity results in greater amplitude and slope of the plastic front [62,63]. Table 3 summarizes the results of the simulated and experimental impact data, including the residual velocities of projectile, the mass, and relative error between the simulation results and experimental measurements.

    • An experimental study on the strain-rate-dependent compressive and tensile response of an alumina ceramic

      2022, Ceramics International
      Citation Excerpt :

      From Fig. 12, the primary crack speed under the uniaxial compression condition ranges from 0.8 to 5.3 km/s with an average value of 2.5 ± 1.4 km/s for strain rates between 71 and 1064 s-1. Work in the literature has shown analytical relationships between strain-rate sensitivity of compression strength and axial crack speed [53,59], with computational works accounting for crack speed growth in micro-mechanical models studying dynamic failure in ceramic materials [60–62]. These values are comparable yet greater when compared with previous reported crack speeds of 1.8 ± 0.6 km/s for AD-85 and 2.2 ± 0.4 km/s for AD-995 series alumina ceramics [3].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text