Abstract
Cotton has many leaves and even more bolls, which results in a complicated source–sink relationship. Under water stress, the single boll weight (SBW) of cotton remains relatively stable, while both the leaf area and leaf photosynthetic rate decrease greatly. It is therefore difficult to understand how the formation of SBW is regulated under water stress solely by considering single-leaf photosynthesis. Considering the cotton boll–leaf system (BLS: including the main-stem leaf, sympodial leaves, and non-leaf organs) as the basic unit of the cotton canopy, we speculated that the formation of SBW may depend on photosynthesis in the corresponding BLS under water stress. To verify this hypothesis, five water treatments were set up in the field. The results showed that with increasing water stress, the relative water content (RWC) of the main-stem and sympodial leaves decreased gradually, and the decrease in the sympodial leaves was more obvious. The SBW and the number of BLSs decreased slightly with increasing water stress, while the number of bolls per plant decreased significantly. The area of the BLS decreased gradually with increasing water stress, and the area of sympodial leaves decreased more than that of the main-stem leaves. Gas exchange showed that the photosynthetic rate of the BLS (Pn(BLS)) decreased gradually with increasing water stress. In addition, the single-leaf photosynthesis and carboxylation efficiency (CE) decreased progressively and rapidly with the increase of water stress. Compared with the main-stem leaf, the photosynthetic function of the sympodial leaf decreased more. Further analysis showed that compared with leaf photosynthetic rate, there was a better correlation between Pn(BLS) and SBW. Thus, the formation of SBW mainly depends on Pn(BLS) under water stress, and the increase of BLS to boll is also helpful to maintain SBW to some extent. In BLS, the photosynthesis of the main-stem leaf plays a very important role in maintaining the stability of SBW, while the photosynthetic performance in sympodial leaves may be regulated plastically to influence SBW.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BLS:
-
The cotton boll–leaf system
- CE:
-
Carboxylation efficiency
- F v/F m :
-
Maximum quantum yield of PSII efficiency
- MFC:
-
The maximum field capacity
- Pn(BLS) :
-
The photosynthetic rate of the BLS
- PS II:
-
Photosystem II
- RWC:
-
Relative water content
- SBW:
-
The single boll weight
References
Basal H, Dagdelen N, Unay A, Yilmaz E (2009) Effects of deficit drip irrigation ratios on cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) yield and fibre quality. J Agron Crop Sci 195:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00340.x
Black CC, Tu ZP, Counce PA, Yao P-F, Angelov MN (1995) An integration of photosynthetic traits and mechanisms that can increase crop photosynthesis and grain production. Photosynth Res 46:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020427
Bota J, Stasyk O, Flexas J, Medrano H (2004) Effect of water stress on partitioning of 14C-labelled photosynthates in Vitis vinifera. Funct Plant Biol 31:697–708. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP03262
Brown KJ (1968) Translocation of carbohydrate in cotton: movement to the fruiting bodies. Ann Bot 32:702–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084243
Chen Y, Gu W, Wang R, Chen D, Wang Y, Wu Y (2004) Studies on classification of the leaf systematic quality and leaf area distribution in cotton. Cotton Sci 16:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v24n01_09
Chen M, Zhang Y, Liang F, Tang J, Ma P, Tian J, Jiang C, Zhang W (2021) The net photosynthetic rate of the cotton boll–leaf system determines boll weight under various plant densities. Eur J Agron 125:126251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126251
Constable GA, Bange MP (2015) The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res 182:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.017
Gerik TJ, Faver KL, Thaxton PM, EI-Zik KM (1996) Late season water stress in cotton: I. plant growth, water use, and yield. Crop Sci 36:914–921. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040017x
Hu Y, Zhang Y, Luo H, Li W, Oguchi R, Fan D, Chow WS, Zhang W (2012) Important photosynthetic contribution from the non-foliar green organs in cotton at the late growth stage. Planta 235:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1511-z
Hu Y, Zhang Y, Yi X, Zhan D, Luo H, Chow WS, Zhang W (2014) The relative contribution of non-foliar organs of cotton to yield and related physiological characteristics under water deficit. J Integr Agr 13:975–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60568-7
Pan YX, Luo W, Jia ZH, Jing SY, Li S, Wu D (2017) Experimental study on measuring soil water content with TRIME-T3 in a saline environment. Arid Land Geogr 40:108–113. https://doi.org/10.13826/j.cnki.cn65-1103/x.2017.01.014
Papastylianou PT, Argyrokastritis IG (2014) Effect of limited drip irrigation regime on yield, yield components, and fiber quality of cotton under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Water Manage 142:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.05.005
Peng S, Krieg DR, Girma FS (1991) Leaf photosynthetic rate is correlated with biomass and grain production in grain sorghum lines. Photosynth Res 28:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027171
Pettigrew WT (2004) Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron J 96:377–388. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0377
Pettigrew WT, McCarty JC Jr, Vaughn KC (2000) Leaf senescence-like characteristics contribute to cotton’s premature photosynthetic decline. Photosynth Res 65:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006455524955
Pinheiro C, Chaves MM (2011) Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J Exp Bot 62:869–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq340
Reddy VR, Reddy KR, Hodges HF (1995) Carbon dioxide enrichment and temperature effects on cotton canopy photosynthesis, transpiration, and water-use efficiency. Field Crops Res 41:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00104-K
Sharkey TD (2016) What gas exchange data can tell us about photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 39:1161–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12641
Steduto P, Cetinkoku O, Albrizio R, Kanber R (2002) Automated closed-system canopy-chamber for continuous field-crop monitoring of CO2 and H2O fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 111:171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00023-0
Wang ZJ, Guo TC, Zhu YJ, Wang YH, Wang JH, Zhao M (2004) Comparison of CO2 assimilation capacity in flag leaf for super-high-yield wheat with different spike type. Acta Agron Sin 30:837–842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v24n01_09
Wang Z, Jin M, Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MT (2014) Evaluation of mulched drip irrigation for cotton in arid Northwest China. Irrig Sci 32:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0409-x
Wang R, Ji S, Zhang P, Meng Y, Wang Y, Chen B, Zhou Z (2016) Drought effects on cotton yield and fiber quality on different fruiting branches. Crop Sci 56:1265–1276. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.08.0477
Wang Y, Chen M, Liang F, Tian J, Zhang Y, Jiang C, Zhang W (2021) Photosynthates competition within the boll–leaf system is alleviated with the improvement of photosynthetic performance during the succession of Xinjiang cotton cultivars. Ind Crops Prod 160:113121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113121
Wullschleger SD, Oosterhuis DM (1990a) Photosynthesis of individual field-grown cotton leaves during ontogeny. Photosynth Res 23:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035007
Wullschleger SD, Oosterhuis DM (1990b) Photosynthetic and respiratory activity of fruiting forms within the cotton canopy. Plant Physiol 94:463–469. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.463
Xu Z, Zhou G, He Q (2021) Vertical distribution of gas exchanges and their integration throughout the entire canopy in a maize field. Photosynth Res 147:269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-020-00817-9
Yang CJ, Luo Y, Sun L, Wu N (2015) Effect of deficit Irrigation on the growth, water use characteristics and yield of cotton in arid Northwest China. Pedosphere. 25:910–924
Zhan D, Yang Y, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Luo H, Zhang W (2014) Contributions of nonleaf organs to the yield of cotton grown with different water supply. The Scientiic World J 2014:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/602747
Zhan D, Zhang C, Yang Y, Luo H, Zhang Y, Zhang W (2015) Water deficit alters cotton canopy structure and increases photosynthesis in the mid-canopy layer. Agron J 107:1947–1957. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0426
Zhang WF, Liang FB, Chen MZ, Jiang CD, Zhang YL (2019) A device for rapid determination of photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate in cotton boll–leaf system. ZL201920325236.0
Zhao W, Wang R, Hu W, Zhou Z (2018) Spatial difference of drought effect on photosynthesis of leaf subtending to cotton boll and its relationship with boll biomass. J Agron Crop Sci 205:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12320
Zheng PY (1992) Introduction to crop physiology. Beijing Agricultural University Press, Beijing.
Zhu X, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:235–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the key projects of the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1803234). We would also like to thanks Yuxuan Wang, Pei Yang, and Peng Yan for assistance in the field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, F., Chen, M., Shi, Y. et al. Single boll weight depends on photosynthetic function of boll–leaf system in field-grown cotton plants under water stress. Photosynth Res 150, 227–237 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00837-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00837-z