Abstract
Although benthic foraminifera are an important component of meiofauna and contribute to carbonate production and carbon/nitrogen cycles, their role in bioturbation processes remains poorly known. Five dominant intertidal benthic foraminiferal species were recently classified into functional bioturbator groups according to their sediment reworking mode and intensity. Our study aimed at identifying potential drivers (i.e. size and/or travelled distance) of species-specific surface sediment reworking rate. The travelled distance and surface sediment reworking rate of Haynesina germanica, Cribroelphidium williamsoni, Ammonia tepida, Quinqueloculina seminulum and Miliammina fusca were assessed through image analysis. Our results show that the surface sediment reworking performed by these species is not size-dependent, but dependent on their motility traits through interspecific differences in the travelled distance. Smaller species (i.e. Quinqueloculina seminulum and Haynesina germanica) contributed more to surface sediment reworking than larger ones (i.e. Ammonia tepida, Cribroelphidium williamsoni and Miliammina fusca). These observations stress the critical role of motion behaviour in surface sediment reworking processes by intertidal foraminifera. Finally, we stress that the high inter-individual variability observed in conspecific motion behaviour may be important to decipher the role of foraminifera in sediment bioturbation. Noticeably, the species characterized by a strong inter-individual variability are also the species that have the highest surface sediment reworking rates. This last observation may inform on the species-specific phenotypic plasticity and, therefore, the potential for the functional role of these species to be maintained in their natural environment. This is particularly relevant in an era of global change where ecosystem balance is increasingly threatened by various stressors such as heat-waves, ocean acidification and pollution.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Aller RC (1994) Bioturbation and remineralization of sedimentary organic matter: effects of redox oscillation. Chem Geol 114:331–345
Aller RC, Aller JY (1992) Meiofauna and solute transport in marine muds. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1018–1033. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.5.1018
Bell W (1991) Searching behaviour: the behavioural ecology of finding resources. Springer, Berlin
Bernard G, Duchêne J-C, Romero-Ramirez A, Lecroart P, Maire O, Ciutat A, Deflandre B, Grémare A (2016) Experimental assessment of the effects of temperature and food availability on particle mixing by the bivalve Abra alba using new image analysis techniques. PLoS ONE 11:e0154270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154270
Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS, Bürger R, Levine JM, Novak M, Rudolf VHW, Schreiber SJ, Urban MC, Vasseur DA (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009
Bonaglia S, Nascimento FJA, Bartoli M, Klawonn I, Brüchert V (2014) Meiofauna increases bacterial denitrification in marine sediments. Nat Commun 5:5133. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6133
Bonaglia S, Hedberg J, Marzocchi U, Iburg S, Glud RN, Nascimento FJA (2020) Meiofauna improve oxygenation and accelerate sulfide removal in the seasonally hypoxic seabed. Mar Environ Res 159:104968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104968
Bouchet VMP, Seuront L (2020) Strength may lie in numbers: intertidal foraminifera non-negligible contribution to surface sediment reworking. OJMS 10:131–140. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2020.103010
Bouchet VMP, Telford RJ, Rygg B, Oug E, Alve E (2018) Can benthic foraminifera serve as proxies for changes in benthic macrofaunal community structure? Implications for the definition of reference conditions. Mar Environ Res 137:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.02.023
Bouchet V, Deldicq N, Baux N, Dauvin JC, Pezy JP, Seuront L, Méar Y (2020) Benthic foraminifera to assess ecological quality statuses: the case of salmon fish farming. Ecological Indicators 117:106607.
Caralp MH (1989) Size and morphology of the benthic foraminifer Melonis barleeanum: relationship with marine organic matter. J Foramin Res 19:235–245
Chandler GT (1989) Foraminifera may structure meiobenthic communities. Oecologia 81:354–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377083
Chapperon C, Seuront L (2011) Variability in the motion behaviour of intertidal gastropods: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. J Mar Biol Ass 91:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531541000007X
Crutsinger GM (2006) Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process. Science 313:966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128326
D’Hondt A-S, Stock W, Blommaert L, Moens T, Sabbe K (2018) Nematodes stimulate biomass accumulation in a multispecies diatom biofilm. Mar Environ Res 140:78–89
De Mesel I, Derycke S, Moens T, Van der Gucht K, Vincx M, Swings J (2004) Top-down impact of bacterivorous nematodes on the bacterial community structure: a microcosm study. Environ Microbiol 6:733–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00610.x
Deldicq N, Seuront L, Langlet D, Bouchet V (2020) Assessing behavioural traits of benthic foraminifera: implications for sediment mixing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 643:21–31. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13334
Deldicq N, Langlet D, Delaeter C, Beaugrand G, Seuront L, Bouchet V (2021) Effects of temperature on the behaviour and metabolism of an intertidal foraminifera and consequences for benthic ecosystem functioning. Sci Rep 11:4013
Dupuy C, Rossignol L, Geslin E, Pascal P-Y (2010) Predation of mudflat meio-macrofauna metazoans by a calcareous foraminifer, Ammonia tepida (Cushman, 1926). J Foraminiferal Res 40:305–312. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.40.4.305
Francescangeli F, Quijada M, Armynot du Chatelet E, Frontalini F, Trentesaux A, Billon G, Bouchet VMP (2020) Multidisciplinary study to monitor consequences of pollution on intertidal benthic ecosystems (Hauts de France, English Channel, France): comparison with natural areas. Marine Environmental Research 160:105034.
Gerlach S (1978) Food-chain relationships in subtidal silty sand marine sediments and the role of meiofauna in stimulating bacterial productivity. Oecologia 33:55–69
Gilbert F, Hulth S, Grossi V, Poggiale J-C, Desrosiers G, Rosenberg R, Gérino M, François-Carcaillet F, Michaud E, Stora G (2007) Sediment reworking by marine benthic species from the Gullmar Fjord (Western Sweden): importance of faunal biovolume. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 348:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.04.015
Green A, Chandler GT (1994) Meiofaunal bioturbation effects on the partitioning of sediment-associated cadmium. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 180:59–70
Gross O (2000) Influence of temperature, oxygen and food availability on the migrational activity of bathyal benthic foraminifera: evidence by microcosm experiments. In: Liebezeit G, Dittmann S, Kröncke I (eds) Life at Interfaces and Under Extreme Conditions. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 123–137
Gross O (2002) Sediment interactions of foraminifera: implications for food degradation and bioturbation processes. J Foramin Res 32:414–424. https://doi.org/10.2113/0320414
Hallock P, Hansen HJ (1979) Depth adaptation in Amphistegina: change in lamellar thickness. Bull Geol Soc Den 27:99–104
Hayward BW, Holzmann M, Grenfell HR, Pawlowski J, Triggs CM (2004) Morphological distinction of molecular types in Ammonia—Towards a taxonomic revision of the world’s most commonly misidentified foraminifera. Mar Micropaleontol 50:237–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(03)00074-4
Henry F, Amara R, Courcot L, Lacouture D, Bertho M-L (2004) Heavy metals in four fish species from the French coast of the Eastern English channel and Southern Bight of the North Sea. Environ Int 30:675–683
Higgins R, Thiel H (1988) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
Hollertz K, Duchêne J-C (2001) Burrowing behaviour and sediment reworking in the heart urchin Brissopsis lyrifera Forbes (Spatangoida). Mar Biol 139:951–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100629
Hulings N, Gray J (1971) A manual for the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Contributions Zool 78:1–84
Jauffrais T, Jesus B, Geslin E, Briand F, Jézéquel VM (2016) Locomotion speed of the benthic foraminifer Ammonia tepida exposed to different nitrogen and carbon sources. J Sea Res 118:52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2016.07.001
Kitazato H (1988) Locomotion of some benthic foraminifera in and on sediments. J Foramin Res 18:344–349. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.18.4.344
Kitazato H (1994) Foraminiferal microhabitats in four marine environments around Japan. Mar Micropaleontol 24:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(94)90009-4
Kristensen E, Penha-Lopes G, Delefosse M, Valdemarsen T, Quintana CO, Banta GT (2012) What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 446:285–302. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09506
Langer M, Hottinger L, Huber B (1989) Functional morphology in low-diverse benthic foraminiferal assemblages from tidal flats of the North Sea. Senckenbergiana Maritima Frankfurtam-Main 20:81–99
Lecerf A, Chauvet E (2008) Intraspecific variability in leaf traits strongly affects alder leaf decomposition in a stream. Basic Appl Ecol 9:598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.11.003
Lohrer AM, Thrush SF, Hunt L, Hancock N, Lundquist C (2005) Rapid reworking of subtidal sediments by burrowing spatangoid urchins. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 321:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.02.002
Maire O, Duchêne JC, Grémare A, Malyuga VS, Meysman FJR (2007a) A comparison of sediment reworking rates by the surface deposit-feeding bivalve Abra ovata during summertime and wintertime, with a comparison between two models of sediment reworking. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 343:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.052
Maire O, Duchêne J, Bigot L, Grémare A (2007b) Linking feeding activity and sediment reworking in the deposit-feeding bivalve Abra ovata with image analysis, laser telemetry, and luminophore tracers. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 351:139–150. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07147
Maire O, Lecroart P, Meysman F, Rosenberg R, Duchêne JC, Grémare A (2008) Quantification of sediment reworking rates in bioturbation research: a review. Aquat Biol 2:219–238. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00053
Maltagliati F, Massaro L, Cossu P, Castelli A (2006) Morphological differentiation in the ragworm, Hediste diversicolor (Polychaeta, Nereididae), as revealed by variation of paragnath number and distribution. Italian J Zool 73:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000600700052
Mare M (1942) A study of a marine benthic community with special reference to the micro-organisms. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 25:517–554
McLusky D, Elliott M (2004) The estuarine ecosystem: ecology, threats and management. Oxford University Press
Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R (2006) Ecosystem engineering: the impact of bioturbation on biogeochemical processes in marine and freshwater benthic habitats. Aquat Sci 68:434–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-006-0858-x
Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R, François-Carcaillet F, Norling K, Mauclaire L (2004) Influence of bioturbation by three benthic infaunal species on microbial communities and biogeochemical processes in marine sediment. Aquat Microb Ecol 36:271–284. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame036271
Mestre NC, Brown A, Thatje S (2013) Temperature and pressure tolerance of larvae of Crepidula fornicata suggest thermal limitation of bathymetric range. Mar Biol 160:743–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2128-x
Meysman FJR, Galaktionov OS, Gribsholt B, Middelburg JJ (2006) Bio-irrigation in permeable sediments: an assessment of model complexity. J Mar Res 64:589–627. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224006778715757
Michaud E, Desrosiers G, Mermillod-Blondin F, Sundby B, Stora G (2005) The functional group approach to bioturbation: the effects of biodiffusers and gallery-diffusers of the Macoma balthica community on sediment oxygen uptake. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 326:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.05.016
Moens T, dos Santos G, Thompson F, Swings J, Fonsêca-Genevois V, Vincx M, De Mesel I (2005) Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth? Aquat Microb Ecol 40:77–83. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame040077
Murray JW (1983) Population dynamics of benthic foraminifera: results from the Exe estuary, England. J Foramin Res 13:1–12
Nascimento FJA, Näslund J, Elmgren R (2012) Meiofauna enhances organic matter mineralization in soft sediment ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 57:338–346. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.1.0338
Näslund J, Nascimento FJ, Gunnarsson JS (2010) Meiofauna reduces bacterial mineralization of naphthalene in marine sediment. ISME J 4:1421–1430. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.63
Nomaki H, Heinz P, Nakatsuka T, Shimanaga M, Ohkouchi N, Ogawa NO, Kogure K, Ikemoto E, Kitazato H (2006) Different ingestion patterns of 13C-labeled bacteria and algae by deep-sea benthic foraminifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 310:96–108
Orvain F, Hir PL, Sauriau P-G (2003) A model of fluff layer erosion and subsequent bed erosion in the presence of the bioturbator, Hydrobia ulvae. J Mar Res 61:823–851. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224003322981165
Orvain F, Sauriau PG, Sygut A, Joassard L, Le Hir P (2004) Interacting effects of Hydrobia ulvae bioturbation and microphytobenthos on the erodibility of mudflat sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 278:205–223. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps278205
Pascal L, Maire O, Deflandre B, Romero-Ramirez A, Grémare A (2019) Linking behaviours, sediment reworking, bioirrigation and oxygen dynamics in a soft-bottom ecosystem engineer: the mud shrimp Upogebia pusilla (Petagna 1792). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 516:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.05.007
Pawlowski J, Bolivar I, Farhni J, Zaninetti L (1995) DNA analysis of “Ammonia beccarii” morphotypes: one or more species? Mar Micropaleontol 26:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(95)00022-4
Prazeres M, Roberts TE, Pandolfi JM (2017) Variation in sensitivity of large benthic foraminifera to the combined effects of ocean warming and local impacts. Sci Rep 7:45227. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45227
Przeslawski R, Zhu Q, Aller R (2009) Effects of abiotic stressors on infaunal burrowing and associated sediment characteristics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 392:33–42. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08221
Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.15.1.523
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Richirt J, Riedel B, Mouret A, Schweizer M, Langlet D, Seitaj D, Meysman FJR, Slomp CP, Jorissen FJ (2020) Foraminiferal community response to seasonal anoxia in Lake Grevelingen (the Netherlands). Biogeosciences 17:1415–1435. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1415-2020
Rysgaard S, Christensen P, Sørensen M, Funch P, Berg P (2000) Marine meiofauna, carbon and nitrogen mineralization in sandy and soft sediments of Disko Bay, West Greenland. Aquat Microb Ecol 21:59–71. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame021059
Saad SA, Wade CM (2016) Biogeographic distribution and habitat association of Ammonia genetic variants around the coastline of Great Britain. Mar Micropaleontol 124:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2016.01.004
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji : an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schratzberger M, Ingels J (2018) Meiofauna matters: the roles of meiofauna in benthic ecosystems. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 502:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.007
Seuront L (2010) How does salinity influence the swimming speed of the estuarine calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis? J Plankton Res 31:1223–1225
Seuront L (2015) When complexity rimes with sanity: loss of fractal and multifractal behavioural complexity as an indicator of sub-lethal contaminations in zooplankton. In: Springer (ed) Marine Productivity: perturbation and resilience of socio-ecosystems, In: Ceccal. New York, pp 129–137
Seuront L, Bouchet VMP (2015) The devil lies in details: new insights into the behavioural ecology of intertidal foraminifera. J Foramin Res 45:390–401. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.45.4.390
Seuront L, Hwang J, Tseng L, Schmitt F, Souissi S, Wong C (2004) Individual variability in the swimming behavior of the sub-tropical copepod Oncaea venusta (Copepoda: Poecilostomatoida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 283:199–217. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps283199
Severin KP, Erskian MG (1981) Laboratory experiments on the vertical movement of Quinqueloculina impressa Reuss through sand. J Foramin Res 11:133–136. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.11.2.133
Verdelhos T, Marques JC, Anastácio P (2015) Behavioral and mortality responses of the bivalves Scrobicularia plana and Cerastoderma edule to temperature, as indicator of climate change’s potential impacts. Ecol Ind 58:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.042
Wukovits J, Bukenberger P, Enge AJ, Gerg M, Wanek W, Watzka M, Heinz P (2018) Food supply and size class depending variations in phytodetritus intake in the benthic foraminifer Ammonia tepida. Biology Open 7:bio030056.
Acknowledgements
The PhD fellowship of N.D. was funded by the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche. We thank the Région Hauts-de-France, the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche and the European Fund for Regional Economic Development for their financial support through the CPER research project CLIMIBIO. The authors are grateful to Magali Schweizer for providing information on the phylotypes occurring at the sampling site (research project AMTEP, funded by the CNRS-INSU programme EC2CO) and Fabio Francescangeli for the SEM-images of foraminiferal species. The authors are grateful to Grégory Beaugrand for his comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The editor and the four reviewers’ comments greatly contributed to improve this paper.
Funding
The PhD fellowship of N.D. was funded by the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche. This study received the financial support of the CPER research project CLIMIBIO funded by the Région Hauts-de-France, and the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, and the European Fund for Regional Economic Development. Molecular investigations of spiral-shaped foraminiferal phylotypes were done within the research project AMTEP, funded by the CNRS-INSU programme EC2CO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ND and VMPB conceived the idea of this study and VMPB obtained financial support. ND and VMPB. provided significant input on experimental design. ND performed the behavioural experiments and analysed the images. ND analysed the data and performed the statistical analyses. ND, LS and VMPB contributed to the interpretation of the data and the discussion of the results presented in the manuscript. ND wrote the draft manuscript. ND, LS and VMPB revised the article critically for intellectual content and gave final approval of the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: M. Huettel.
Reviewers: B. Corliss and undisclosed experts.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deldicq, N., Seuront, L. & Bouchet, V.M.P. Inter-specific and inter-individual trait variability matter in surface sediment reworking rates of intertidal benthic foraminifera. Mar Biol 168, 101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03908-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03908-w