Abstract
Literacy standards (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers in Common core state standards: English language arts standards, 2010) and best practices from Institute of Education Sciences practice guides (e.g., Baker et al. in Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014-4012), National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2014; Kamil et al. in Improving adolescent literacy: effective classroom and intervention practices (NCEE 2008-4027), National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2008) encourage content-area teachers to use text reading to improve vocabulary and comprehension for middle grade students. Despite these strong research recommendations and various literacy initiatives, previous research studies have found a persistent pattern of limited text use (i.e., reading and learning from text) in content-area classrooms, thus limiting students’ opportunities to develop advanced literacy skills. This study extends the research base on text use in middle school by presenting findings of a questionnaire administered to 124 middle school teachers and offering insights on how text is typically used in English language arts, science, and social studies classes. Teachers responded to questions about the duration and frequency of text use, as well as reading formats, reading materials (including textbooks), and challenges to utilizing text reading more often. Findings suggest that while most teachers indicated a desire to increase the amount of reading in their classes, they cited challenges such as students’ difficulty with reading and a preference for using other types of teaching activities. Teachers also cited the need for higher-quality texts, and science and social studies teachers, in particular, reported dissatisfaction with and limited use of textbooks. Implications for practice include providing professional development focused on selecting appropriate texts for instruction, using text reading routines that enhance purposeful learning, and integrating reading practices into existing instructional delivery practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allensworth, E., & Easton, J. (2005). The on-track indicator as a predictor of high school graduation. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Balfanz, R. (2011). Back on track to graduate. Educational Leadership, 68(7), 54–58.
Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J. M., Fox, J. H., DePaoli, J. L., Ingram, E. S., & Maushard, M. (2014). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic (Annual update). Retrieved July 14, from 2020 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556758.pdf.
Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J. M., Bruce, M., & Fox, J. H. (2012). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic (Annual update). Retrieved July 14, from 2020 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530320.pdf.
Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & MacIver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223–235.
Baker, S., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Kieffer, M. J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014–4012). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Horizon Research.
Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: A review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 68–84.
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., et al. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325998.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: Reports of the Subgroups (00–4754). U.S. Government Printing Office.
Fisher, D. (2009). The use of instructional time in the typical high school classroom. The Educational Forum, 73(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720902739650
Greenleaf, C. (1995). Setting a new mark at Balboa High School: Assessing changes in student learning opportunities, student perspectives, and student growth. HERALD Project evaluation report. HERALD Project.
Greenleaf, C., & Valencia, S. (2017). Missing in action: Learning from texts in subject-matter classrooms. In K. Hinchman & D. Appleman (Eds.), Adolescent literacies: A handbook of practice-based research (pp. 235–256). Guilford Press.
Hernandez, D. (2012). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved October 14, from 2020 http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/AECF-DoubleJeopardy-2012-Full.pdf.
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices (NCEE 2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Dimino, J., Schumm, J. S., & Bryant, D. (2002). Collaborative Strategic Reading: Strategies for improving comprehension. Sopris West.
Litman, C., Marple, S., & Greenleaf, C., with Bolz, M., Charney-Sirott, I., Richardson, L., & Hall, A. (2013). Classroom observation opportunity to learn analysis, November 2013. Strategic Literacy Initiative, WestEd. READI Technical Report #4. Retrieved from URL: projectreadi.org
Litman, C., Marple, S., Greenleaf, C., Charney-Sirott, I., Bolz, M. J., Richardson, L. K., Hall, A. H., George, M., & Goldman, S. R. (2017). Text-based argumentation with multiple sources: A descriptive study of opportunity to learn in secondary English language arts, history, and science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(1), 79–130.
Murnane, R., Sawhill, I., & Snow, C. (2012). Literacy challenges for the twenty-first century: Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 22(2), 3–15.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). NAEP report card: Reading. Retrieved September 29, from 2020 https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading?grade=8.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards: English language arts standards. Retrieved October 14, from 2020 http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy.
Parker, W., Lo, J., Yeo, A. J., Valencia, S. W., Nguyen, D., Abbott, R. D., Nolen, S. B., Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424–1459. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213504237
Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.). (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. National Academy of Education.
Ratekin, N., Simpson, M., Alvermann, D. E., & Dishner, E. K. (1985). Why content teachers resist reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 28(5), 432–437.
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 3–42.
Rupley, W. H., Blair, T. R., & Nichols, W. D. (2009). Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: The role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2–3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683523
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., McCulley, L., Stillman-Spisak, S., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., et al. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.91071.
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Fall, A.-M., Roberts, G., Hall, C., et al. (2017). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below-average readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1072068.
Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Schnakenberg, J. B., Fall, A., Vaughn, M. G., & Wexler, J. (2015). Improving reading comprehension for high school students with disabilities: Effects for comprehension and school retention. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 117–131.
Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M., et al. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.
Wanzek, J., Martinez, L., Fall, A.-M., Roberts, G., Stillman, S., & Kent, S. C. (2018). Text reading supports in social studies content instruction and their relationship to student knowledge acquisition. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(4), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1446858
Funding
This research was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A170556 to The University of Texas at Austin. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, C.S., Stevens, E.A. & Vaughn, S. Teachers’ text use in middle school content-area classrooms. Read Writ 35, 177–197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10177-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10177-y