Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research with Children: Lessons Learned from the International Survey of Children’s Wellbeing

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the rising importance of studying children's lives and wellbeing from their own perspective. That said, studying children as participants of the study, rather than studying their parents or observing them as objects raises great challenges and dilemmas. The current paper examines them in an exploratory analysis of the Children's Worlds international survey of children's subjective wellbeing, by examining the international survey process, focusing on ethical and practical aspects of data collection from children. Research teams in 35 countries that took part in the survey submitted a questionnaire regarding their data collection process, including the number of ethical permissions required, type of permissions, school participation rates, objections to the study, etc. Findings reveal that the majority of countries required at least two permissions, and 40% required four and more. Additionally, an increasing requirement for parental active permission was observed. Approximately 80% of countries reported encountering objections to the study. Countries reporting only one required permission also reported 100% school participation, while countries requiring four or five permissions reported 53% average school participation rate, indicating that as the number of required permissions increased, chances of child participation decreased. Findings largely support the gatekeepers phenomena in studying children, thus we discuss conclusions and implications for research directly involving children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

data is available in SPSS.

Code Availability

codes are available in SPSS.

References

  • Akard, T. F., Wray, S., & Gilmer, M. (2015). Facebook ads recruit parents of children with cancer for an online survey of web-based research preferences. Cancer Nursing, 38(2), 155–161.

  • Alaimo, K. (2002). Historical roots of children’s rights in Europe and the United States. In K. Alaimo & B. Klug (Eds.), Children as equals: Exploring the rights of the child (pp 121–140). University Press of America.

  • Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2004). Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people. Barkingside: Barnados.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, C., Cheadle, A., Diehr, P., & Wagner, E. (1995). Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based survey research. Evaluation Review, 19(6), 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S. (2003). Information for research in developing countries—Information technology, a friend or foe? The International Information & Library Review, 35(2–4), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). “Is it fun?” Developing child-centred research methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1), 33–58.

  • Baker, J. R., Yardley, J. K., & Mccaul, K. (2001). Characteristics of responging-, nonresponding- and refusing-parents in an adolescent lifestyle choice study. Evaluation Review, 25(6), 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 74, 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The Child Indicators Movement: Past, Present, and Future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & Kosher, H. (2020). The child study movement. In: S. Hupp, & J. Jewell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescent development. Wiley.

  • Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. E. (2014). Multifaceted concept of child wellbeing. In Handbook of Child Wellbeing (pp. 1–27). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, B. (1997). Personal accounts: Involving disabled children in research. Social Policy Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, S., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2020). La historia del estudio Children’s Worlds. Sociedad E Infancias, 4, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.5209/soci.68411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., González, M., Figuer, C., & Coenders, G. (2004). Subjective Wellbeing, Values and Goal Achievement. In A. Dannerbeck, F. Casas, M. Sadurni, & G. Coenders (Eds.), Quality-of-Life Research on Children and Adolescents (pp. 123–141). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F. E. R. R. A. N., Coenders, G., Cummins, R. A., González, M., Figuer, C., & Malo, S. (2008). Does subjective wellbeing show a relationship between parents and their children? Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Bello, A., González, M., & Aligué, M. (2013). Children’s subjective wellbeing measured using a composite index: What impacts Spanish first-year secondary education students’ subjective wellbeing? Child Indicators Research, 6(3), 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. & James, A. (Eds) (2000). Research with children: Perspectives and practices. Falmer Press.

  • Collings, S., Grace, R., & Llewellyn, G. (2016). Negotiating with gatekeepers in research with disadvantaged children: A case study of children of mothers with intellectual disability. Children & society, 30(6), 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courser, M. W., Shamblen, S. R., Lavrakas, P. J., Collins, D., & Ditterline, P. (2009). The impact of active consent procedures on nonresponse and nonresponse error in youth survey data evidence from a new experiment. Evaluation Review, 33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X09337228

  • Coyne, I. (2010). Accessing children as research participants: examining the role of gatekeepers. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(4), 452–454.

  • Cree, V. E., Kay, H., & Tisdall, K. (2002). Research with children: sharing the dilemmas. Child & Family Social Work, 7(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delk, J., Blythe Harrell, M., Fakhouri, T. H. I., Muir, K. A., & Perry, C. L. (2017). Implementation of a computerized tablet-survey in an adolescent large-scale, school-based study. Journal of School Health, 87(7), 506–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinisman, T., Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2012). The subjective wellbeing of Spanish adolescents: Variations according to different living arrangements. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2374–2380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., Einarsdóttir, J., & Perry, B. (2012). Young children’s decisions about research participation: opting out. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.715405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumas, D. M., Esp, S., & Hausheer, R. (2015). Parental Consent Procedures: Impact on Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias. Journal of Substance Abuse & Alcoholism, 3(2), 1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, P. L., & Hawes, J. A. (1989). An assesment of active versus passice methods for obtainint parental consent. Evaluation Review, 13(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, F., Deschenes, E. P., Vogel, R. E., West, J., Arboit, K., & Harris, L. (1996). Active Parental Consent in School-Based Research: An Examination of Ethical and Methodological Issues. Evaluation Review, 20(6), 737–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, F., Melde, C., Taylor, T. J., & Peterson, D. (2008). Active Parental Consent in School-Based Research: How Much Is Enough and How Do We Get It? Evaluation Review, 32(4), 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fargas-Malet, M., Mcsherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques. Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X09345412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). When Children are Asked About Their Wellbeing: Towards a Framework for Guiding Policy. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. B. (2005). Deception research involving children: Ethical practices and paradoxes. Ethics and Behavior, 15(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. B., Brunnquell, D. J., Hughes, D. L., Liben, L. S., Maholmes, V., Plattner, S., Russell, S. T., & Susman, E. J. (2013). Preserving and Enhancing the Responsible Conduct of Research Involving Children and Youth: A Response to Proposed Changes in Federal Regulations and commentaries. Social Policy Report, 27(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, G. V. (2007). Increasing parental involvement in our schools: The need To overcome obstacles, promote critical behaviors, and provide teacher training. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 4(2), 23–30.

  • Friberg, P., Hagquist, C., & Osika, W. (2012). Self-perceived psychosomatic health in Swedish children, adolescents and young adults: An internet-based survey over time. British Medical Journal Open, 2(4), e000681. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, K. C., McCarthy, D. M., D’Amico, E. J., Metrik, J., Ellingstad, T. P., & Brown, S. A. (2004). Impact of consent procedures on reported levels of adolescent alcohol use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(4), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A., Powell, M. A., & Taylor, N. (2015). Ethical research involving children: Encouraging reflexive engagement in research with children and young people. Children & Society, 29(5), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harger, B., & Quintela, M. (2017). The IRB as gatekeeper: Effects on research with children and youth. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 22, 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120180000022002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1991). From property to person status: Historical perspective on children’s rights. American Psychologist, 46(1), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. A. (1992). Children's participation: From tokenism to citizenship. UNISEF Innocenti Essay No. 4.

  • Hicks, L (2018). Research with children - SBE. CITI training for Research with Human subjects

  • Hill, M. (1997). Participatory research with children. Child and Family Social Work, 2, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1997a). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. & Prout, A. (1997b). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In: A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (2nd eds). Falmer Press.

  • Kirk, S. (2007). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(7), 1250–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosher, H., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2009). Child Participation in Social Policy Design: The Role of Social Work. Social Security (Hebrew Edition), (81), 107–134. Retrieved July 22, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23279098

  • Leakey, T., Lunde, K. B., Koga, K., & Glanz, K. (2004). Written Parental Consent and the Use of Incentives in a Youth Smoking Prevention Trial: A Case Study From Project SPLASH. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(4), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K., & Devine, P. (2010). Using the Internet to Give Children a Voice: An Online Survey of 10- and 11-Year-Old Children in Northern Ireland. Field Methods, 22(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10374279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macgregor, E., & Mcnamara, J. R. (1995). Comparisons of return procedures involving mailed versus student-delivered parental consent forms. Psychological Reports, 7(7), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musa, P. F. (2006). Making a case for modifying the technology acceptance model to account for limited accessibility in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 12(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswell, D. (2016). Re-aligning children’s agency and re-socialising children in childhood studies. In F. Esser, M. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies (pp. 19–33). Routledge.

  • Patalay, P., Deighton, J., Fonagy, P., & Wolpert, M. (2015). Equivalence of paper and computer formats of a child self-report mental health measure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny, S. B., Jason, L. A., Schoeny, M. E., Townsend, S. M., & Curie, C. J. (2001). Do participation rates change when active consent procedures replace passice consent. Evaluation Review, 25(5), 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. A., & Smith, A. B. (2006). Ethical guidelines for research with children: A review of current research ethics documentation in New Zealand. Kotuitui. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 1(2), 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. A., & Smith, A. B. (2009). Children’s participation rights in research. Childhood, 16(1), 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. R., Son, S.-H., File, N., & Juan, R. R. S. (2010). Parent–school relationships and children’s academic and social outcomes in public school prekindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A., & James, A. (2005). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood. Critical Concepts in Sociology, 1, 56.

  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with Children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J. (1999). The meaning of child’s standard of living. In A. B. Andrews & N. H. Kaufman (Eds.), Implementing the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child: A standard of living adequate for development. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. G., Sundberg, E. C., & Flint, K. H. (1999). Informed Consent in School Health Research: Why, How, and Making It Easy. Journal of School Health, 69(5), 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Cline, M., & Nelson, R. M. (2013). Parental permission and child assent in research on children. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86(3), 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruck, M. D., & Horn, S. S. (2008). Charting the landscape of children’s rights. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 685–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S., & Avgerou, C. (2002). Introducing the special issue on information and communication technologies in developing countries. The Information Society, 18(2), 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, L. (2020). Informed Consent in Educational Settings and the Novice Researcher. Kairaranga, 11(1), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secor-Turner, M., Sieving, R., Widome, R., Plowman, S., & Vanden Berk, E. (2010). Active Parent Consent for Health Surveys With Urban Middle School Students: Processes and Outcomes. Journal of School Health, 80(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00468.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T., Cross, D., Thomas, L. T., & Zubrick, S. R. (2015). Bias in student survey findings from active parental consent procedures. British Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, M., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2014). School-aged children as sources of information about their lives. A. Ben-Arieh, J. Cashmore, G. Goodman, & GB, Melton (Eds.), Handbook of Child Research. Sage Publications.

  • Spence, S., White, M., Adamson, A. J., & Matthews, J. N. (2015). Does the use of passive or active consent affect consent or completion rates, or dietary data quality? Repeat cross-sectional survey among school children aged 11–12 years. BMJ Open, 5(1).

  • Spilsbury, J. C., Korbin, J. E., & Coulton, C. J. (2009). Mapping children’s neighborhood perceptions: Implications for child indicators. Child Indicators Research, 2(2), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strier, M., & Katz, H. (2016). Trust and parents involvement in schools of choice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swauger, M. (2009). No kids allowed!!!: How IRB ethics undermine qualitative researchers from achieving socially responsible ethical standards. Race, Gender & Class, 16(1/2), 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarasawa, B., & Waggoner, J. (2015). Increasing parental involvement of English Language Learner families: What the research says. Journal of Children and Poverty, 21(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2015.1058243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, D., Joffe, S., & Kodish, E. (2006). Children are not small adults: Documentation of assent for research involving children. Journal of Pediatrics, 149(1 SUPPL.), 31–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/crc/fulltext.htm

  • Vereecken, C. (2001). Paper pencil versus pc administered querying of a study on health behaviour in school-aged children. Arch Public Health, 59, 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereecken, C. A., & Maes, L. (2006). Comparison of a computer-administered and paper-and-pencil-administered questionnaire on health and lifestyle behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(4), 426–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waligora, M., Dranseika, V., & Piasecki, J. (2014). Child’s assent in research: age threshold or personalisation? BMC medical ethics, 15(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, V. M., Hill, D. J., & Effendi, Y. (2004). How does active parental consent influence the findings of drug-use surveys in schools? Evaluation Review, 28(3), 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürcher, T., Elger, B., & Trachsel, M. (2019). The notion of free will and its ethical relevance for decision-making capacity. BMC Medical Ethics, 20:31.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The third wave of the Children’s Worlds survey was supported by the Jacobs Foundation.

Funding

The third wave of the Children’s Worlds survey was supported by the Jacobs Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Work, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Israel

    Daphna Gross-Manos

  2. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Hanita Kosher & Asher Ben-Arieh

Authors
  1. Daphna Gross-Manos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanita Kosher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asher Ben-Arieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daphna Gross-Manos.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Ethics Approval

Each participating country research team obtained needed ethical approval from the relevant academic institute, and the Ministry of Education if necessary.

Consent to participate and for application

Parents and children were asked for consent in a procedure explained in the method section (consent letters are available in Hebrew).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gross-Manos, D., Kosher, H. & Ben-Arieh, A. Research with Children: Lessons Learned from the International Survey of Children’s Wellbeing. Child Ind Res 14, 2097–2118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09829-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09829-w

Search

Navigation