Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 20, 2021

Novel gas measurement based on pressure triggered release cycles for biochemical methane potential tests

  • Ozan K. Bekmezci ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Zehra Sapci-Ayas ORCID logo and Deniz Ucar ORCID logo

Abstract

This study aims to present a novel gas counter and to demonstrate its suitability for biochemical methane potential tests. In this system, the gas to be measured is collected in a chamber enclosed with two one-way solenoid valves and the absolute pressure is continuously monitored. After a trigger pressure is reached, a portion of the gas is released and the amount of the released gas is calculated according to ideal gas law and recorded. Three iterations of the supervisory control and data acquisition unit were constructed and tested for BMP measurement. Although it can be further improved and variations are possible, the presented final version works with eight reactors simultaneously and the recommended maximum gas flow is 1.24 mL/min. For those reactors, the measured/theoretical BMP ratio was 65.3% with 4.2% standard uncertainty, which is subjectively acceptable. Therefore, it can be concluded that the concept is valid and applicable to BMP tests.


Corresponding author: Ozan K. Bekmezci, Permanent address: Department of Environmental Engineering, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis, Turkey; and Affiliated for PhD thesis: Department of Environmental Engineering, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey, E-mail:

Funding source: Harran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Award Identifier / Grant number: 16121

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank to Dilara Öztürk for COD measurements; to Erbil Özdemir for modeling Figure 2(a); to Ezgi Piro, Bekir Biçer, and Ensar Ömer Çetin for their help during assembly of the setup; Ümit Budak for printing the circuit board of the SPI bus; Çağlar Küllü for grammar check; to Ömer Akgiray for his general support.

  1. Author contributions: Ozan K. Bekmezci: Lead author, conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing-original draft preparation, writing-review and editing, visualization, project administration. Deniz Ucar: Resources, writing-review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition. Zehra Sapci Ayas: Methodology, resources, data curation, writing-review and editing, supervision, project administration.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by Harran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (HUBAK, project no. 16121).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The corresponding author considers participating in the commercialization of any product based on the proposed system. The details of this research will be published in his PhD thesis.

References

Angelidaki, I., J. E. Schmidt, L. Ellegaard, and B. K. Ahring. 1998. “An Automatic System for Simultaneous Monitoring of Gas Evolution in Multiple Closed Vessels.” Journal of Microbiological Methods 33 (1): 93–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(98)00044-x.Search in Google Scholar

APHA. 1999. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environmental Federation.Search in Google Scholar

Badshah, M., D. M. Lam, J. Liu, and B. Mattiasson. 2012. “Use of an Automatic Methane Potential Test System for evaluating the Biomethane Potential of Sugarcane Bagasse After Different Treatments.” Bioresource Technology 114: 262–9, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.022.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bekiaris, G., J. M. Triolo, C. Peltre, L. Pedersen, L. S. Jensen, and S. Bruun. 2015. “Rapid Estimation of the Biochemical Methane Potential of Plant Biomasses Using Fourier Transform Mid-infrared Photoacoustic Spectroscopy.” Bioresource Technology 197: 475–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.050.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bekmezci, O. K. 2018. Ozantheone/Gas-Counter-For-BMP. Retrieved from https://github.com/ozantheone/Gas-Counter-For-BMP (accessed November 11, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bekmezci, O. K. 2019. Gas-Counter-For-BMP/Data Acquisition. Retrieved from https://github.com/ozantheone/Gas-Counter-For-BMP/tree/master/DataAcquisition (accessed February 18, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bellaton, S., S. Guérin, N. Pautremat, J. Bernier, M. Muller, S. Motellet, S. Azimi, A. Pauss, and V. Rocher. 2016. “Early Assessment of a Rapid Alternative Method for the Estimation of the Biomethane Potential of Sewage Sludge.” Bioresource Technology 206: 279–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.139.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bishop, E. 2013. Indicators: International Series of Monographs in Analytical Chemistry, 51. Burlington, Canada: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Buswell, A. M., and G. E. Symons. 1933. “The Methane Fermentation of Carbohydrates.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 55 (5): 2028–36.10.1021/ja01332a039Search in Google Scholar

Cadena Pereda, R. O., E. M. Rivera Muñoz, and G. Herrera Ruiz. 2010. “Automatic Volumetric Gas Flow Meter for Monitoring Biogas Production from Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digester.” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 147 (1): 10–4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.03.053.Search in Google Scholar

Estevez, M. M., R. Linjordet, and J. Morken. 2012. “Effects of Steam Explosion and Co-digestion in the Methane Production from Salix by Mesophilic Batch Assays.” Bioresource Technology 104: 749–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Estevez, M. M., Z. Sapci, R. Linjordet, A. Schnürer, and J. Morken. 2014. “Semi-continuous Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cow Manure and Steam-Exploded Salix with Recirculation of Liquid Digestate.” Journal of Environmental Management 136: 9–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Godin, B., F. Mayer, R. Agneessens, P. Gerin, P. Dardenne, P. Delfosse, and J. Delcarte. 2015. “Biochemical Methane Potential Prediction of Plant Biomasses: Comparing Chemical Composition Versus Near Infrared Methods and Linear Versus Non-linear Models.” Bioresource Technology 175: 382–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

JCGM-WG1. 2008. Evaluation of Measurement Data – Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with Minor Corrections). International Organization for Standardization Geneva. Retrieved from bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html.Search in Google Scholar

Jingura, R. M., and R. Kamusoko. 2017. “Methods for Determination of Biomethane Potential of Feedstocks: A Review.” Biofuel Research Journal 4 (2): 573–86, https://doi.org/10.18331/brj2017.4.2.3.Search in Google Scholar

Kispergher, E. M. Aquino, L. C. D. Costa Junior, T. C. D., R Weinschutz, and A. L Mathias. 2017. “Effect of Organic Load and Alkalinity on Dairy Wastewater Biomethanation.” Engenharia Agricola 37 (4): 820–7, https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n4p820-827/2017.Search in Google Scholar

Koch, K., S. D. Hafner, S. Astals, and S. Weinrich. 2020. Evaluation of Common Supermarket Products as Positive Controls in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Tests. Switzerland: Water.10.3390/w12051223Search in Google Scholar

Liu, J., G. Olsson, and B. Mattiasson. 2004. “A Volumetric Meter for Monitoring of Low Gas Flow Rate from Laboratory-Scale Biogas Reactors.” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 97 (2–3): 369–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2003.09.014.Search in Google Scholar

Luna-delRisco, M., A. Normak, and K. Orupõld. 2011. “Biochemical Methane Potential of Different Organic Wastes and Energy Crops from Estonia.” Agronomy Research 9 (1–2): 331–42.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Sibaja, A., A. Alvarado-Lassman, C. M. Astorga-Zaragoza, M. Adam-Medina, R. Posada-Gómez, and J. P. Rodríguez-Jarquin. 2011. “Volumetric Gas Meter for Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Bioreactors.” Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 44 (10): 1801–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.08.018.Search in Google Scholar

Mata-Alvarez, J., A. Mtz-Viturtia, and R. Torres. 1986. “A Simple Device to Measure Biogas Production in Laboratory Scale Digesters.” Biotechnology Letters 8 (10): 719–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01032569.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, R. 2016. Roger Meier’s Freeware. Retrieved from https://freeware.the-meiers.org (accessed June 17, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Moletta, R., and G. Albagnac. 1982. “A Gas Meter for Low Rates of Gas Flow: Application to the Methane Fermentation.” Biotechnology Letters 4 (5): 319–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132833.Search in Google Scholar

Parajuli, P. 2011. Biogas Measurement Techniques and the Associated Errors. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä Department of Biological and Environmental Science Renewable Energy Programme.Search in Google Scholar

Sapci, Z. 2013. “The Effect of Microwave Pretreatment on Biogas Production from Agricultural Straws.” Bioresource Technology 128: 487–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.094.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, S. A., and C. O. Stöckle. 2008. “A Biogas Meter with Adjustable Resolution and Minimal Back-Pressure.” Bioresource Technology 99 (17): 8537–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Spanjers, H., and J. B. van Lier. 2006. “Instrumentation in Anaerobic Treatment – Research and Practice.” Water Science and Technology 53 (4–5): 63–76, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.111.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ward, A. J. 2016. “Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Determination of the Biochemical Methane Potential: State of the Art.” Chemical Engineering and Technology 39 (4): 611–9, https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201500315.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-12-31
Accepted: 2021-04-27
Published Online: 2021-05-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2020-0244/html
Scroll to top button