Skip to main content
Log in

Neural Efficiency and Ability to Produce Accurate Efforts in Different Perceived Intensity Zones

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between neural efficiency and the ability of an athlete to produce accurate efforts in different perceived intensity zones during a racing scenario. The α/β ratio was used to quantify the neural efficiency during cycling, as it traduced the degree of participants information processing activity with lower cortical activity possible. Twelve trained competitive male cyclists delimited their perceived intensity zones 2 to 6 on a scale to assess the rating of exercise intensity. Then, they performed a 30 min racing scenario during which they had to produce different perceived intensities. The ability of athletes to produce perceived effort with accuracy and their neural efficiency was quantified during the racing scenario. The increase in the neural efficiency with the increase in the effort intensity could partly explain the improvement in athletes’ ability to produce accurately perceived efforts from intensity zones 3 to 6. Moreover, the neural efficiency during the racing scenario was significantly correlated to the ability to produce perceived effort with accuracy at submaximal intensities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data and material are available.

Abbreviations

PO:

Power output

IZ:

Intensity zones

MC:

Motor cortex

PFC:

Prefrontal cortex

PC:

Parietal cortex

RCP:

Respiratory compensation point

RPE:

Rate of perceived exertion

RSEI:

Rate of subjective exercise intensity

HR:

Heart rate

ES:

Effect size

MAP:

Maximal aerobic power

CAD:

Cadence

POIZlow :

Mean relative PO at the lower limit of IZ (2 to 6)

POIZmiddle :

Mean relative PO at the middle limit of IZ (2 to 6)

POIZhigh :

Mean relative PO at the higher limit of IZ (2 to 6)

POmean :

Mean PO during a racing scenario block

PO%:

Difference between and POmean and POIZmiddle for each IZ

FFT:

Fast Fourier transformed

PSD:

Power spectral density

TTE:

Time trial to exhaustion

References

Download references

Funding

The authors didn’t receive any funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Scholler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest:

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

Each participant wrote informed consent, and the study was conducted following the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1983) and approved by the regional ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 104 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 273 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scholler, V., Groslambert, A., Grosprêtre, S. et al. Neural Efficiency and Ability to Produce Accurate Efforts in Different Perceived Intensity Zones. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 46, 335–345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-021-09517-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-021-09517-z

Keywords

Navigation