Contribution of soil moisture variations to high temperatures over different climatic regimes
Introduction
The soil, land cover (i.e. vegetation cover), and the overlaying atmosphere are the main components of the land-atmosphere system (Wulfmeyer et al., 2018). The interactions among the components of this system have received attention in different disciplines such as atmospheric science, land management and hydrology (Seneviratne et al., 2010; Wulfmeyer et al., 2018). Land use/cover changes such as agricultural expansion, wetland drainage, reforestation and deforestation highly impact the strength of land-atmosphere coupling via changing soil moisture budget (Hu et al., 2019; Steyaert and Knox, 2008). Therefore, the soil-vegetation-atmosphere interactions reflect the historical land use change and pattern of croplands, and are useful for reconstructing the related datasets (Steyaert and Knox, 2008). In addition, the knowledge on the soil moisture-precipitation feedback enhances the forecast skill of precipitation and climate predictability (Guillod et al., 2015; Guo and Dirmeyer, 2013). The soil moisture and temperature feedback loops also control near-surface heat flux variations. Evapotranspiration of soil water decreases near-surface temperature which is known as evaporative cooling effect (Mueller and Seneviratne, 2012; Seneviratne et al., 2010). In other words, by partially dissipating available energy via latent heat flux, soil moisture and evapotranspiration affect near-surface microclimate. Soil water shortage, therefore, induces enhanced near-surface atmospheric temperature as there is more energy remaining for sensible heating (Herold et al., 2016; Mueller and Seneviratne, 2012). Extreme hot temperatures profoundly influence different sectors, particularly in agriculture (Nouri et al., 2017; Prasad et al., 2011). Hot temperatures as a consequence of soil water deficit worsens meteorological drought impacts on agricultural systems (Bannayan et al., 2020; Nouri and Bannayan, 2019; Paymard et al., 2019). The frequency and intensity of hot extremes are also anticipated to increase under future climate change particularly in water-limited regions (Huang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Recent literature has revealed that occurrence of high temperatures and low soil moisture availability are well correlated for some regions over the globe such as the USA (Ford and Quiring, 2014; Ford et al., 2017), east China (Meng and Shen, 2014), southeastern Europe (Hirschi et al., 2010) and Australia (Herold et al., 2016; Holmes et al., 2017). Studying soil moisture-temperature coupling provides insight into forecasting heat waves (Ford et al., 2017; Orth and Seneviratne, 2014) which is helpful to adopt appropriate measures to reduce the risks imposed by high temperatures and droughts in croplands. In most regions, interannual precipitation anomalies are triggered by global-scale climate oscillations such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) (Dai and Wigley, 2000; Sun et al., 2015). Thus, the soil water variations and consequently soil moisture-temperature connection appear to be affected by this large-scale oscillation over ENSO-affected areas (Ford and Quiring, 2014; Holmes et al., 2017).
Long times series of soil moisture observations are unavailable in most parts of world. Furthermore, the soil water data are mostly point-based and highly spatially heterogeneous (Robinson et al., 2008; Sims et al., 2002). Alternatively, soil moisture can be retrieved from remote sensing data or estimated by proxies, such as the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). As compared with remote-sensing acquisitions, proxies can be calculated over a longer time period, which is important for robust and reliable statistical analyses and more locations based on easily available climatic data (e.g. precipitation), and are available in real time (Mueller and Seneviratne, 2012). In addition, the soil profile water variability can be better estimated based on soil moisture surrogates (e.g. SPI) relative to remote sensing retrievals which mainly represent very surface soil water dynamics (Hirschi et al., 2014). The soil moisture surrogates employed within the related literature were mostly obtained on the basis of precipitation data (Herold et al., 2016). However, since the soil water balance is not only driven by precipitation but also by other components such as evapotranspiration, application of precipitation-based proxies may introduce substantial uncertainties to the results. This is of greater significance for water-limited regions where the evapotranspiration processes greatly affect soil moisture fluctuations. In addition, one specific time scale, representing soil moisture depth, has been mainly considered. Note that the soil moisture retained at soil layers may contribute to land-atmosphere interactions differently under different climatic conditions (Hagemann and Stacke, 2014; Hirschi et al., 2014).
Iran with predominantly semi-arid and arid climates experiences increasingly frequent precipitation- and temperature-related extremes (Alizadeh-Choobari and Najafi, 2017; Rahimi and Hejabi, 2018). Such extreme events seem to have adversely affected the agriculture sector and caused a range of serious socio-economic consequences in Iran (Bannayan et al., 2011; Nouri and Bannayan, 2019; Nouri et al., 2017). To the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted to investigate the coupling strength between the soil moisture and near-surface temperature over Iran. In addition, since the climate variability can be partially explained by ENSO events over some regions in Iran (Nazemosadat and Cordery, 2000; Nazemosadat and Ghasemi, 2004; Nouri and Homaee, 2020; Sabziparvar et al., 2011), soil water-temperature associations are expected to be impacted by ENSO. Therefore, this study is aimed to assess i) the correlation between soil water variations and high temperatures using the precipitation-based and precipitation/reference evapotranspiration-based proxies calculated at different time scales, and ii) the effects of ENSO modes on soil moisture-temperature interactions over a broad range of seasonal climatic conditions in Iran.
Section snippets
Study area
Iran includes 9 out of 30 possible climate types classified based on the updated Köppen-Geiger method (Peel et al., 2007). This climate variety is mainly due to existence of two mountain ranges i.e. Alborz (in the north) and the Zagros (in the west) (Ghorbani, 2013). A sub-humid/humid climate prevails over the northern sides of the Alborz as humid air masses coming from the Caspian Sea are trapped by the Alborz mountain chain. The Zagros Mountains extending from northwest (Kordestan province)
The correlation of the proxies and the measured soil moisture
Almost all cases exhibited an insignificant relationship between subsoil moisture variations and the one-month proxies illustrating that these indicators did not properly represent the deeper moisture variability (Fig. 2-a to -h). SPI6 was also not significantly correlated with subsoil water variations for most sites (Fig. 2-i to -l). There was, however, a significant correlation between the measured subsoil moisture variations and SPEI6 at 82.5 % of cases (Fig. 2-m to -p). Therefore, SPEI6
Conclusions
Our findings reveal that SPEI, as compared with SPI, provided a better signature of soil water variations. Thus, using the proxies which include ET0 is better suited for approximating the soil moisture changes particularly in drier condition. When seasonal AI value varied between 0.2 and 1, SPEI1 was correlated significantly with HTI in most cases. This can be attributed to the fact that evapotranspiration process is soil-supply dependent under such condition and thus the topsoil moisture
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This research was partly granted by Agrohydrology Research Group of Tarbiat Modares University (Grant Number IG-39713) corresponding to the second author. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments.
References (62)
- et al.
Log-logistic flood frequency analysis
J. Hydrol.
(1988) The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff
J. Hydrol. (Amst)
(2002)- et al.
Using remotely sensed soil moisture for land–atmosphere coupling diagnostics: the role of surface vs. Root-zone soil moisture variability
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2014) - et al.
Impacts of idealized land cover changes on climate extremes in Europe
Ecol. Indic.
(2019) - et al.
Drylands face potential threat under 2 °C global warming target
Nat Clim Change
(2017) - et al.
Towards modeling soil texture-specific sensitivity of wheat yield and water balance to climatic changes
Agric Water Manage
(2016) Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review
Earth. Rev.
(2010)- et al.
A global analysis of the asymmetric effect of ENSO on extreme precipitation
J. Hydrol. (Amst)
(2015) - et al.
Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, 55
Courier Corporation.
(1965) - et al.
Extreme weather events in Iran under a changing climate
Clim. Dyn.
(2017)