Peano continua with self regenerating fractals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2021.107754Get rights and content

Abstract

We deal with the question of Masayoshi Hata: is every Peano continuum a topological fractal? A compact space X is a topological fractal if there exists F a finite family of self-maps on X such that X=fFf(X) and for every open cover U of X there is nN such that for all maps f1,,fnF the set f1fn(X) is contained in some set UU.

In the paper we present some idea how to extend a topological fractal and we show that a Peano continuum is a topological fractal if it contains so-called self regenerating fractal with nonempty interior. A Hausdorff topological space A is a self regenerating fractal if for every non-empty open subset U, A is a topological fractal for some family of maps constant on AU.

The notion of self regenerating fractal much better reflects the intuitive perception of self-similarity. We present some classical fractals which are self regenerating.

Introduction

We deal with the topological generalization of IFS-attractors - a compact set invariant under the finite family of contractions. Let us recall that a function f between two metric spaces is called contraction if its Lipschitz constant Lipf<1. By an iterated function system (IFS) on a metric space X we understand a finite family of contractions XX. A function XX is called a self-map on X. For a given family F of self-maps on X we define the following families of maps:F0={idX},Fn={f1fn;f1,,fnF}. Moreover, let F(Y)=fFf(Y) for YX.

Let F be an iterated function system on a metric space X. A compact set AX is an IFS-attractor (deterministic fractal, self-similar set) for F if A=F(A). A simple example of such space is the unit interval [0,1] - the IFS-attractor for family {x2,x+12}. Other known examples are the ternary Cantor set, Koch curve, Sierpiński triangle, Sierpiński carpet, etc. It can be also shown that every arc of finite length is an IFS-attractor (see [7]).

A topological fractal is a topological version of IFS-attractor. It is a pair (X,F) where X is a compact space, F is a finite family of continuous self-maps which has some topological contractive property on X (see Definition 2.1) and X=F(X). Topological fractals have been studied in various contexts, e.g. among countable spaces [6] or zero-dimensional spaces [2]. Now we are interested in topological fractals in the class of Peano continua. By Peano continuum we understand a metrizable, locally connected continuum or, equivalently (thanks to the Hahn–Mazurkiewicz theorem), a continuous image of the unit interval. Masayoshi Hata proved in [5] that for every topological fractal (X,F) if X is connected, then it is locally connected, so it is a Peano continuum. It is still an open question: is every Peano continuum a topological fractal?

Looking for the conditions when a Peano continuum P becomes a topological fractal, we discover that the existence of a free arc (an open subset of P homeomorphic to the interval) implies this result (see [4]). This leads us to the notion of self regenerating fractal. A Hausdorff topological space X is called a self regenerating fractal if for every nonempty, open subset U there exists F, a family of continuous functions constant outside U such that (X,F) is a topological fractal. Having such a self regenerating fractal as a subset with nonempty interior, guarantees that a Peano continuum is a topological fractal together with some family of maps. This is our main result presented in the chapter 4:

Main theorem

For every Peano continuum X which has AX self regenerating fractal with nonempty interior, X is an underlying space for some topological fractal.

This statement and definition of self regenerating fractal are proposed by Taras Banakh and developed by the author.

Section snippets

Topologically contracting systems

The generalization of iterated function systems for topological spaces was proposed by Banakh and Nowak in [1] as topologically contracting families of maps.

Definition 2.1

A finite family F of continuous self-maps on the Hausdorff space X is called a topologically contracting system on YX if for any open cover U of Y there exists a number n such that for every f1,,fnF the image f1fn(Y) is contained in some set UU.

Remark 2.2

If the set YF(X), then the definition of topologically contracting system F on Y is

Topological fractals and their extensions

Assume that every compact set is also a Hausdorff space.

Definition 3.1

A pair (X,F) is called a topological fractal if X is a compact space, F is a topologically contracting system on X and X=fFf(X). Then the space X and the family F will be called respectively an underlying space and a fractal structure of a topological fractal (X,F).

Note that in case of topological fractal (X,F) we have F(X)=X, so results from the chapter 2 are trivial. Nevertheless, they will be useful if we want to “extend a

Peano continua as topological fractals

We are interested in the old question posted by Hata in 1985:

Problem 4.1

Is every Peano continuum an underlying space for some topological fractal?

In fact Hata in his paper [5, page 392] asked is every locally connected continuum Q is an invariant set (F(Q)=Q) for the finite family F of so-called weak contractions. Now we know that such space Q with family F is exactly the same as topological fractal. Namely, a space Q is an underlying space for some topological fractal if and only if there exists a

Self regenerating fractals

In this chapter we will expand our knowledge about self regenerating fractals which plays an important role in the main theorem of this paper. Let us notice that the definition of self regenerating fractal tries to catch the sense of self-similarity - every small piece of the space is a “copy” of the whole object. The structure of a self regenerating fractal must be rich enough for its every piece to be able to self regenerate a finite cover of the whole object. Such property appears for

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Taras Banakh for many fruitful discussions and proposing the statement of Definition 4.7 and Theorem 4.8.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text