Skip to main content
Log in

Lever Control for Position Control of a Typical Excavator in Joint Space Using a Time Delay Control Method

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unmanned robotic excavator system has recently become one solution for rescue at the disaster site. Almost all of the solutions about excavator automation have used the electric valve controller and pressure sensor through the mechanical modifications since they are essential. However, some problems might occur because of unpredictable cost and time consumption in modifying the hydraulic drive and mechanical system. In contrast, this paper proposes a completely novel approach for regulation control of any typical hydraulic excavator by excluding those devices which is related to hydraulic drive system. This method controls the lever displacements physically by using the detachable devices and embedded system for avoiding an any modifications and complex computation. Applying the time delay control (TDC) method, this paper demonstrates the globally stable of regulation control of an excavator in the joint space even though states about the hydraulic systems and body dynamics are not observed. It is expected that this method could help the user to safe respond to requirements in emergencies through the rapid robotization without modifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data, models generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Code Availability

All code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  1. Shimano, Y., Kami, Y., Shimokaze, K.: Development of PC210LCi-10/PC200i-10 machine control hydraulic excavator. Komatsu Techn. Rep. 167, 60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jin, S. M.: Development of the Remote Control Excavator System Using the Adaptive Sliding Mode Control. Master Thesis, Mechatronics and IT, University of Ulsan (2002)

  3. Bradley, D. A., Seward, D. W.: The development, control and operation of an autonomous robotic excavator. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 21(1), 73–97 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Hanh, D., et al.: Trajectory control of electro-hydraulic excavator using fuzzy self tuning algorithm with neural network. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 23(1), 149–160 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ha, Q., et al.: Robotic excavation in construction automation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 9 (1), 20–28 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Saeedi, P., et al.: An autonomous excavator with vision-based track-slippage control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 13(1), 67–84 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt, D., Proetzsch, M., Karsten, B.: Simulation and control of an autonomous bucket excavator for landscaping tasks. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2010)

  8. Skibniewski, M., Chris, H.: Automation and robotics for road construction and maintenance. J. Transp. Eng. 116(3), 261–271 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zweiri, Y. H., Seneviratne, L. D., Althoefer, K.: Modelling and control of an unmanned excavator vehicle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 217(4), 259–274 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ostoja-Starzewski, M., Skibniewski, M.: A master-slave manipulator for excavation and construction tasks. Robot. Auton. Syst. 4(4), 333–337 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin, S. M., et al.: Development of remote control system for field robot. IEEE International Conference on Smart Manufacturing Application (2008)

  12. Kim, K., et al.: Development of electro-hydraulic control valve for intelligent excavato. IEEE ICCAS-SICE (2009)

  13. Yusof, A., et al.: Position Control Mathematical Modelling and Operational Evaluation of Tele-operated Electro-hydraulic Actuator (t-EHA). Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 773. Trans Tech Publications (2015)

  14. Kim, D., et al.: Excavator tele-operation system using a human arm. Autom. Construct. 18 (2), 173–182 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tafazoli, S., et al.: Impedance control of a teleoperated excavator. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 10(3), 355–367 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ha, Q. P., et al.: Impedance control of a hydraulically actuated robotic excavator. Autom. Construct. 9(5-6), 421–435 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salcudean, S. E., et al.: Bilateral matched impedance teleoperation with application to excavator control. IEEE Control. Syst. Mag. 19(6), 29–37 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Salcudean, S. E., et al.: Impedance control of a teleoperated mini excavator. IEEE 1997 8th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Proceedings ICAR’97 (1997)

  19. Salcudean, S. E., et al.: Evaluation of impedance and teleoperation control of a hydraulic mini-excavator. Experimental Robotics V, pp. 227–240. Springer, Berlin (1998)

  20. Nguyen, Q. H., et al.: Force/position tracking for electrohydraulic systems of a robotic excavator. Proceedings of the 39th, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No. 00CH37187), vol. 5 (2000)

  21. Koivumaki, J., Jouni, M.: Stability-guaranteed impedance control of hydraulic robotic manipulators. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22(2), 601–612 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dindorf, R., Wos, P.: Force and position control of the integrated electro-hydraulic servo-drive. IEEE 2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC) (2019)

  23. Zhao, J., et al.: A robust force feed-forward observer for an electro-hydraulic control loading system in flight simulators. ISA Trans. 89, 198–217 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Busquets, E., Monika, I.: Adaptive robust motion control of an excavator hydraulic hybrid swing drive. SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 8(2015-01-2853), 568–582 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bu, F., Bin, Y.: Nonlinear model based coordinated adaptive robust control of electro-hydraulic robotic arms via overparametrizing method. Proceedings. ICRA. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (Cat. No. 01CH37164) 4, 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shen, W., et al.: Robust controller design for the excavator swing system under the active regulating common pressure rail. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control. 40(11), 3323–3332 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, S., et al.: A Robust Control Approach for Hydraulic Excavators Using u-synthesis. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 16(4), 1615–1628 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng, H., et al.: Robotic excavator trajectory control using an improved GA based PID controller. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 105, 153–168 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Youcef-Toumi, K., Ito, O.: A time delay controller for systems with unknown dynamics. IEEE 1988 American control conference. (1998)

  30. Jin, M., et al.: Model-free robust adaptive control of humanoid robots with flexible joints. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64(2), 1706–1715 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Y., et al.: Time-Delay Control using a novel nonlinear adaptive law for accurate trajectory tracking of Cable-Driven robots. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics (2016)

  32. Beak, J., et al.: A widely adaptive time-delayed control and its application to robot manipulators. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 66(7), 5332–5342 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang, P. H., Lee, S. J.: A straight-line motion tracking control of hydraulic excavator system. Mechatronics 12(1), 119–138 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee, S. U., Chang, P. H.: Control of a heavy-duty robotic excavator using time delay control with integral sliding surface. Control Eng. Practice 10(7), 697–711 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moon, S. M.: A study of workspace mapping method between remote controller and detachable lever control robot for remote operations of the excavation. Master thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering Hanyang University (2015)

  36. Shin, D., et al.: Development of remote controlled manipulation device for a conventional excavator without renovation. IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII) (2012)

  37. Lee, S. H.: Development of the automated excavation system based on mount-type robot manipulators for commercial hydraulic excavator. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering Hanyang University (2015)

  38. Sun, D. I.: Analysis of the position recognition of the bucket tip according to the motion measurement method of excavator boom, stick and bucket. Sensors 20(10), 2881 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University(HY-2018-0797).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sun and Hwang conceived and designed the study. Sun and Han performed the experiments. Sun and Hwang wrote the paper. Sun and Han reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeakweon Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

First author and second author contributed equally to this work.

Appendix A

Appendix A

The phase of the way how to get these relationship graphs as follows. First, the commands signal was transmitted intentionally with a constant interval from 0 to 255 to the manipulator. Second, the angular velocity was recorded at each signal of u1 at the same time. When it came to the boom, the clockwise angular velocities were recorded until the boom joint reached the qboom = 10. The starting angle was qboom = 70. The arm and bucket joints are not in motion while the boom is in motion since commands signal (lever displacements) are input (occurred) independently. The range of u1 for making a joint be working clockwise is 129 to 255. The interval of each signal is almost 7. This is the case of the first top result graph in Fig. ??. When it was moving in a counterclockwise motion, the angular velocities were recorded until the boom joint reached the qboom = 70 and the starting angle was qboom = 10. The 10 and 70 angles are of limited value when constrained mechanically. The range of u1 is 127 to 0. This is the case of the first bottom result graph in Fig. f??. The stick and bucket cases were done in the same manner using u2, u3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, D., Hwang, S. & Han, J. Lever Control for Position Control of a Typical Excavator in Joint Space Using a Time Delay Control Method. J Intell Robot Syst 102, 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01416-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01416-z

Keywords

Navigation