Elsevier

Space Policy

Volume 57, August 2021, 101441
Space Policy

An Environmental Impact Assessment Framework for Space Resource Extraction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2021.101441Get rights and content

Abstract

Extraterrestrial bodies contain a number of resources that are likely targets for future resource extraction operations. There is an increasing interest in extracting resources from these bodies, particularly to reduce the amount of material that must be launched from Earth and, in turn, the cost of space missions. While the economic and technical feasibility of space resource extraction is the focus of many studies, this work considers the associated extraterrestrial environmental implications. Resource extraction in space is likely to result in a number of environmental impacts, ranging from the generation of dust and changes to landscapes, through to regolith contamination and waste generation. A framework for extraterrestrial environmental impact assessment (EIA) for resource extraction operations is proposed for space resource projects. This framework will allow for the environmental impacts of potential space resource extraction projects to be identified, so they can be avoided or addressed through mitigation measures. Carrying out EIAs for space resource extraction operations is likely to improve the outcome of these operations by reducing environmental risk, and thus reducing the potential for unexpected clean up and mitigation costs in the future, increasing investor confidence and improving chances of acceptance by the public and other stakeholders. There is considerable uncertainty as to what impacts space resource extraction is likely to have on the environment, therefore the proposed EIA framework is intended to be improved upon continually, through feedback from the outcomes of future resource extraction projects.

Introduction

If humanity could start over again, we would likely wish to make wiser choices when it comes to protecting the environment. As we work towards further exploration of celestial bodies, we have the opportunity to apply the knowledge and experience learned from Earth to protecting the extraterrestrial environment. Extraterrestrial bodies, such as asteroids, Mars and the Moon, are an untapped and potentially abundant supply of resources, which may have many uses in space, and, eventually perhaps, on Earth. There are a number of public and private enterprises that have expressed interest in extracting these resources, leading to concerns about a lack of governance and regulation over the extraterrestrial environment [1]. Continued exploration of space, and especially establishing further human presence in space, requires a vast amount of resources. Many of these are already available as natural resources in space, and a number of in-situ resource utilisation (ISRU) schemes have been proposed to extract resources, such as water, for use in space (e.g., Ref. [2]). Motivations for extracting space resources may go beyond human space travel and colonisation, with private organisations evaluating the potential of extracting resources that are becoming increasingly scarce on Earth from space, such as platinum group metals. These resources would then be brought to Earth for use, should it become economically feasible to do so (e.g., Ref. [3]). Although a number of studies have investigated the technical and economic feasibility of extracting resources in space, many of them do not identify and assess the potential extraterrestrial environmental impacts, leading to calls for an environmental protocol for managing these extraterrestrial activities [1,4,5]. Particularly, as the private space sector continues to grow, it is clear that there is no shortage of ambition or excitement surrounding the exploration of outer space. However, as noted by Lin (2006) [6], there is also increasing concern about environmental risks and conservation. Newman [7] notes that a failure to address potential issues in the extraterrestrial environment arising from human activity could have serious implications for space activities in the future. This highlights the importance of extraterrestrial environmental management, ideas for which, have been proposed by several studies (e.g., Refs. [[8], [9], [10]]).

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an environmental management tool, which is used to assess the potential environmental consequences of a particular project or action. It has been successfully applied on Earth across a range of projects from mining operations through to assessing impact of space launches on Earth's environment [[11], [12], [13]]. The use of EIA spans many decades, and it has been applied in a number of countries across the world, as well as to address transboundary environmental impacts (e.g., Refs. [14,15]). Because of this, we have identified EIA as a tool with potential to support decision-making and environmental management of off-Earth mining (OEM) operations. EIA provides a means to identify and predict the potential extraterrestrial environmental impacts associated with OEM. This allows for mitigation measures to be developed and put in place [16]. In addition, the comparison of alternative courses of action and stakeholder engagement in the decision-making process are important aspects of the EIA process.

The definition of OEM used in this context is that of Shishko et al. [17], which is the extraction of minerals, volatiles (hydrogen, helium, water oxygen) and other indigenous resources from the Moon, Mars, asteroids and comets. OEM can be divided into three broad categories: resource extraction for use in-situ in space (known as in-situ resource utilisation [ISRU]), resource extraction for use in space (but not in-situ), and resource extraction for use on Earth. ISRU is a term collectively used to describe the process of extracting and processing resources from celestial bodies and utilising the products in space. The key aim of extracting resources in space is to produce consumables for human space missions and space settlements, including rocket propellants, life support gases, reactants for energy production and materials to manufacture infrastructure [18]. The extraction of space resources would lead to considerable reductions in the mass that would be required to be launched from Earth for space missions, so if a spacecraft bound for Mars could refuel near the Moon or a near-Earth asteroid, for example, it would result in significant monetary savings compared to travelling directly from Earth. At present, the main focus of ISRU research is the extraction of volatiles from ice, regolith, and in the case of Mars, the atmosphere [2,19,20]. ISRU is currently the primary focus for OEM, as extracting resources in space for return to Earth, is, at present, not financially viable [21]. Although not yet economically viable, there has been considerable discussion about the potential to someday extract resources in space for return to Earth (e.g., Refs. [[22], [23], [24]]). Metals like platinum and palladium that are relatively rare on Earth and abundant in asteroids are likely to be targets for future resource return operations [25].

Section snippets

Motivations for EIA of OEM operations

Impacts of OEM on the extraterrestrial environment may be counterproductive to future resource extraction activities, space exploration, scientific investigation, and preserving historical artifacts and sites of cultural significance in space. There is a variety of reasons why environmental management of OEM activities is important for ensuring that resource extraction in space is carried out sustainably and responsibly.

Proposed framework for EIA of OEM projects

EIA was first established as a mandated procedure in the USA in 1969 by the National Environmental Policy Act, and has since been adopted in some form by almost all other countries [47]. Since their introduction many decades ago, EIA procedures have evolved considerably, and their continued widespread use is a testament to EIA's effectiveness as a planning tool. EIAs are used to predict, assess and reduce the environmental risks associated with a particular project or action, with stakeholder

Extraterrestrial environmental regulation and EIA implementation

The OST was put into effect by the United Nations in 1967 and has, at present, 107 countries as parties [38]. Environmental considerations were not paramount at the time the treaty was created, and it was largely written to prevent space being militarised, promote the peaceful use of outer space, and prevent claims of sovereignty in outer space. Thus, there is little guidance in the OST about resource exploitation and related environmental concerns. Following on from the OST, the Agreement

Challenges of EIA for OEM

EIAs typically focus on environmental impacts in the vicinity of the project site(s). In the case of OEM operations, the focus of EIA studies will be the environment proximal to the resource extraction site. This means that environmental impacts that do not occur in the location may not be considered. For example, an OEM operation is likely to involve the launch of at least one space vehicle from Earth. The impact these launches have on Earth's environment can be considerable [83]. Thus,

Conclusion and recommendations

While currently in its infancy, resource extraction in space is likely to become increasingly important moving forward. Thus, now is the ideal time to start putting provisions in place to protect the extraterrestrial environment and promote environmentally sustainable extraction of space resources. We propose the use of EIAs for OEM operations, as one aspect of the necessary environmental management of activities in space. The approach involves a three-phase EIA process, with stakeholder

CRediT authorship contribution statement

J.A. Dallas: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. S. Raval: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. S. Saydam: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. A.G. Dempster: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful feedback. Financial support for this research was provided by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

References (87)

  • J.A. Dallas et al.

    Mining beyond earth for sustainable development: will humanity benefit from resource extraction in outer space?

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2020)
  • Dag Linnarsson et al.

    Toxicity of lunar dust

    Planet. Space Sci.

    (2012)
  • Alexandra Courtin-Nomade et al.

    Weathering of Sb-rich mining and smelting residues: insight in solid speciation and soil bacteria toxicity

    Chem. Erde – Geochem.

    (2012)
  • Iain Thornton

    Impacts of mining on the environment; some local, regional and global issues

    Appl. Geochem.

    (1996)
  • Mario F. Palos et al.

    Lunar ISRU energy storage and electricity generation

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2020)
  • Victor R. Baker et al.

    Fluvial geomorphology on Earth-like planetary surfaces: a review

    Geomorphology

    (2015)
  • I.A. Crawford et al.

    Back to the Moon: the scientific rationale for resuming lunar surface exploration

    Planet. Space Sci.

    (2012)
  • Miguel Clavero et al.

    Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2005)
  • G. Kminek et al.

    Report of the COSPAR mars special regions colloquium

    Adv. Space Res.

    (2010)
  • Jennifer M. Durden et al.

    A procedural framework for robust environmental management of deep-sea mining projects using a conceptual model

    Mar. Pol.

    (2017)
  • Romane H. Cristescu et al.

    A review of fauna in mine rehabilitation in Australia: current state and future directions

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2012)
  • Lucy Mercer-Mapstone et al.

    Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • Jason Prno

    An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry

    Resour. Pol.

    (2013)
  • Bertram I. Spector et al.

    Problems of ratifying international environmental agreements: overcoming initial obstacles in the post-agreement negotiation process

    Global Environ. Change

    (1993)
  • J.A. Dallas et al.

    The environmental impact of emissions from space launches: a comprehensive review

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • Sigita Židonienė et al.

    Life Cycle Assessment in environmental impact assessments of industrial projects: towards the improvement

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2015)
  • Ibsen C. Cardenas et al.

    Coping with uncertainty in environmental impact assessments: open techniques

    Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.

    (2016)
  • Pascale Ehrenfreund et al.

    Responsible space exploration and use: balancing stakeholder interests

    New Space

    (2013)
  • Elvis Martin

    Let's mine asteroids — for science and profit

    Nat. News

    (2012)
  • William R. Kramer

    In dreams begin responsibilities – environmental impact assessment and outer space development

    Environ. Pract.

    (2017)
  • Patrick Lin

    Viewpoint: look before taking another leap for mankind—ethical and social considerations in rebuilding society in space

    Astropolitics

    (2006)
  • Christopher Newman

    Establishing an ecological ethical paradigm for space activity” ROOM

    Space J.

    (2015)
  • Fengna Xu

    Environmental protection in the exploitation and use of space resources

    IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.

    (2020)
  • Martin Elvis et al.

    How much of the solar system should we leave as wilderness?

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2019)
  • Fabiana Li

    Documenting accountability: environmental impact assessment in a Peruvian mining project

    PoLAR: Polit. Legal Anthropol. Rev.

    (2009)
  • Constellation Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Technical report

    (2008)
  • A. Tesli et al.

    EIA in a transboundary context: principles and challenges for a coordinated Nordic application of the Espoo Convention

    Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.

    (1999)
  • Ross Marshall

    Application of mitigation and its resolution within environmental impact assessment: an industrial perspective

    Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais.

    (2001)
  • Kurt Sacksteder et al.

    In-situ resource utilization for lunar and mars exploration

  • Lauren E. Shaw

    Asteroids, the new western frontier: applying principles of the general mining law of 1872 to incentive asteroid mining

    J. Air Law Commer.

    (2013)
  • M. Ingebretsen

    Mining asteroids

    IEEE Spectr.

    (2001)
  • Chris Lewicki et al.

    Planetary resources—the asteroid mining company

    New Space

    (2013)
  • B.R. Blair

    The Role of Near-Earth Asteroids in Long-Term Platinum Supply

    (2000)
  • Cited by (18)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text