Abstract
Using a statecraft framework, the article analyses Cold War US-Soviet exchange programs with a specific focus on scientific-technical exchanges. The practice of scientific-technical exchanges is meaningful at least in three ways: (1) it helps to better understand the art of American and Soviet statecraft that had a major impact on the course of events in maintaining inter-state relations; (2) it shows that statecraft does not make itself, but is accomplished through various tools of public diplomacy in which exchange programs are one; and (3) it allows to utilize a long-term perspective and evaluate the legacy of the exchanges of persons and their impact on bilateral relations despite the Cold War tensions. The legacy of scientific-technical exchanges and their impact on bilateral relations might be incorporated into the contemporary academic and practitioner discourse on public diplomacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamishin, Anatoly. 2005. V Raznie Gody. Vneshnepoliticheskie Ocherki. Moskva: Ves’ Mir. [Adamishin Anatoliy. 2005. In different years. The foreign policy notes. Moscow: Ves Mir].
Allison, G. If Not the Cold War, Then What? Chicago Tribune 15 March 1989.
Anonymous. 1953. The Exchange of Scientific Information with the Soviet Union. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 9 (1): 13–15.
Anonymous, 1956. US-Soviet Exchanges Urged, Physics Today. August.
Anonymous, 1957. U.S.-Soviet Exchange, The New York Times. July 22.
Anonymous. 1961. Soviet-American Exchanges: For Different Reasons, Both Sides Find Them Advantageous. Science 134: 1511–1512.
Bettie, Molly. 2020. Exchange diplomacy: Theory, policy and practice in the Fulbright program. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 16: 212–223.
Brady, Leslie S. 1962. The Role of Cultural and Educational Exchanges in Soviet-American Relations. The Slavic and East European Journal 6 (3): 197–213.
Budiansky, Stephen. 1983. Exchange scholars recalled. Nature 305: 463.
Bulpitt, Jim. 1986. The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher’s Domestic Statecraft. Political Studies XXXIV: 19–39.
Constantinou, Costas. 2013. Between Statecraft and Humanism: Diplomacy and Its Forms of Knowledge. International Studies Review 15: 141–162.
Craig, Gordon, and Alexander George. 1983. Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cull, Nicholas. 2008a. The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy, 1945–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cull, Nicholas. 2008b. Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.
Dickson, David. 1980. US academy suspends exchanges with Soviet Union. Nature 284: 4.
Dittmer, Jason. 2017. Diplomatic Material: Affect, Assemblage, and Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
Drezner, Daniel. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Drinkwater, Derek. 2005. Sir Harold Nicolson and International Relations. Oxford University Press.
Dobrynin, Anatoly. 1995. In Confidence: Moscow’s Ambassador to America’s Six Cold War Presidents. Random House.
Geltzer, A. 2012. In a Distorted Mirror. The Cold War and U.S.-Soviet Biomedical Cooperation and (Mis)understanding, 1956–1977. Journal of Cold War Studies 14 (3): 39–63.
George, Anna. 1997. Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History. International Security 22 (1): 44–52.
Elizabeth, Frazer, and Kimberly Hutchings. 2011. Virtuous Violence and the Politics of Statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber. Political Studies 59: 56–73.
Graham, L.R. 1978. How valuable are scientific exchanges with the Soviet Union? Science 202 (4366): 383–390.
Graham, L.R. 1983. Scientific exchanges with the Soviet Union. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 39 (5): 2–3.
Jo, Guldi, and David Armitage. 2014. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, Marcus. 2018. Face-to-Face Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
James, Toby S. 2016. Neo-Statecraft Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Change. Government and Opposition 51 (1): 84–110.
Krasnyak, Olga. 2018a. The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Construction of an Ideal Type of Science Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 13 (4): 410–431.
Krasnyak, Olga. 2018b. National Styles in Science, Diplomacy, and Science Diplomacy. Leiden, New York: Brill.
Krasnyak, Olga. 2019 How U.S.-Soviet Scientific and Technical Exchanges Helped End the Cold War, American Diplomacy. Online. http://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2019/11/how-u-s-soviet-scientific-and-technical-exchanges-helped-end-the-cold-war/ Accessed 7 March 2021.
Krasnyak, Olga. 2020a. Russian Science Diplomacy. Diplomatica 2: 118–134.
Krasnyak, Olga. 2020b. Science Diplomacy and Soviet-American Academic and Technical Exchanges. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15: 398–408.
Krause, Keith. 1991. Military Statecraft: Power and Influence in Soviet and American Arms Transfer Relationships. International Studies Quarterly 35: 313–336.
McKercher, B.J.C., ed. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Diplomacy and Statecraft. London and New York: Routledge.
Memorandum of Conference With President Eisenhower, Washington, 22 September 1959. Office of the Historian. Online. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v10p1/d123 Accessed 8 March 2021.
Milne, David. 2015. Worldmaking. The Art and Science of American Diplomacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Mitchell, Lawrence, and Philip Coombs. 1962. Soviet-American Exchange of Scientists. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 18 (2): 15–17.
Paul, T.V. 2017. Recasting Statecraft: International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change. International Studies Quarterly 61 (1): 1–13.
Rich, Vera. 1979. US at sixes and sevens over Soviet exchanges. Nature 277: 424.
Richmond, Yale. 1986. U.S.-Soviet Cultural Exchanges, 1958–1986: Who Wins? Boulder: Westview Press.
Richmond, Yale. 2003. Cultural Exchange and the Cold War: Raising the Iron Curtain. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Rosenberg, Victor. 2005. Soviet-American Relations, 1953–1960: Diplomacy and Cultural Exchange during the Eisenhower Presidency. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Rosenfeld, Stephen. 1964. Soviet-American Exchanges - Tit-for-Tat Goodwill. Science 143: 1413–1417.
Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. 2020a. France's Science Diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. Online. https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2020/frances-science-diplomacy Assessed 8 March 2021.
Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. 2020b. Collaboration and Competition: The Twofold Logic of Science Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (3): 1–13.
Schweitzer, Glenn. 1988. Who Wins in US-Soviet Science Ventures? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: 28–32.
Schweitzer, Glenn. 1989. Techno-diplomacy: US-Soviet Confrontations in Science and Technology. New York: Plenum.
Sher, Gerson. 2019. From Pugwash to Putin: A Critical History of US-Soviet Scientific Cooperation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Shifrinson, Joshua. 2018. Rising Titans, Falling Giants: How Great Powers Exploit Power Shifts. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Surowiec, Pawel, and Philip Long. 2020. Hybridity and Soft Power Statecraft: The ‘GREAT’ Campaign. Diplomacy & Statecraft 31 (1): 168–195.
Surowiec, Pawel. 2020. Between Europeanisation and Corporatisation: Poland’s Nation Branding and Soft Power for Public Consumption. East European Politics, Societies & Culture.
Tsygankov, Andrei. 2016. Russia’s Foreign Policy Change and Continuity in National Identity. Fourth Edition. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham.
U.S.-Soviet Scientific Exchange. 1985. Eos.Transactions American Geophysical Union 66 (9): 91.
Velikaya, Anna. 2020. Soviet Public Diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00193-0Assessed8March.
Weisskopf, Victor, and Robert Wilson. 1980. American-Soviet scientific exchanges: More important than ever. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 36 (6): 1.
Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation
About Implementing the Agreements between the USSR and the USA on Exchanges in the Field of Science, Technology, Education and Culture. 1960, box 44, folder 326, item 68, pp. 1–66.
Questions on Scientific Cooperation. 1968–1969, box 59, folder 370, item 18, pp. 67–70, 146–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krasnyak, O. The Cold War statecraft and public diplomacy: assessing US-Soviet scientific-technical exchanges. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 54–63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00220-8
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00220-8