Skip to main content
Log in

The Cold War statecraft and public diplomacy: assessing US-Soviet scientific-technical exchanges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a statecraft framework, the article analyses Cold War US-Soviet exchange programs with a specific focus on scientific-technical exchanges. The practice of scientific-technical exchanges is meaningful at least in three ways: (1) it helps to better understand the art of American and Soviet statecraft that had a major impact on the course of events in maintaining inter-state relations; (2) it shows that statecraft does not make itself, but is accomplished through various tools of public diplomacy in which exchange programs are one; and (3) it allows to utilize a long-term perspective and evaluate the legacy of the exchanges of persons and their impact on bilateral relations despite the Cold War tensions. The legacy of scientific-technical exchanges and their impact on bilateral relations might be incorporated into the contemporary academic and practitioner discourse on public diplomacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamishin, Anatoly. 2005. V Raznie Gody. Vneshnepoliticheskie Ocherki. Moskva: Ves’ Mir. [Adamishin Anatoliy. 2005. In different years. The foreign policy notes. Moscow: Ves Mir].

  • Allison, G. If Not the Cold War, Then What? Chicago Tribune 15 March 1989.

  • Anonymous. 1953. The Exchange of Scientific Information with the Soviet Union. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 9 (1): 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 1956. US-Soviet Exchanges Urged, Physics Today. August.

  • Anonymous, 1957. U.S.-Soviet Exchange, The New York Times. July 22.

  • Anonymous. 1961. Soviet-American Exchanges: For Different Reasons, Both Sides Find Them Advantageous. Science 134: 1511–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettie, Molly. 2020. Exchange diplomacy: Theory, policy and practice in the Fulbright program. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 16: 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Leslie S. 1962. The Role of Cultural and Educational Exchanges in Soviet-American Relations. The Slavic and East European Journal 6 (3): 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, Stephen. 1983. Exchange scholars recalled. Nature 305: 463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulpitt, Jim. 1986. The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher’s Domestic Statecraft. Political Studies XXXIV: 19–39.

  • Constantinou, Costas. 2013. Between Statecraft and Humanism: Diplomacy and Its Forms of Knowledge. International Studies Review 15: 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Gordon, and Alexander George. 1983. Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, Nicholas. 2008a. The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy, 1945–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cull, Nicholas. 2008b. Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, David. 1980. US academy suspends exchanges with Soviet Union. Nature 284: 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmer, Jason. 2017. Diplomatic Material: Affect, Assemblage, and Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Daniel. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, Derek. 2005. Sir Harold Nicolson and International Relations. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrynin, Anatoly. 1995. In Confidence: Moscow’s Ambassador to America’s Six Cold War Presidents. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geltzer, A. 2012. In a Distorted Mirror. The Cold War and U.S.-Soviet Biomedical Cooperation and (Mis)understanding, 1956–1977. Journal of Cold War Studies 14 (3): 39–63.

  • George, Anna. 1997. Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History. International Security 22 (1): 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth, Frazer, and Kimberly Hutchings. 2011. Virtuous Violence and the Politics of Statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber. Political Studies 59: 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L.R. 1978. How valuable are scientific exchanges with the Soviet Union? Science 202 (4366): 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L.R. 1983. Scientific exchanges with the Soviet Union. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 39 (5): 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Guldi, and David Armitage. 2014. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Marcus. 2018. Face-to-Face Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, Toby S. 2016. Neo-Statecraft Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Change. Government and Opposition 51 (1): 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnyak, Olga. 2018a. The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Construction of an Ideal Type of Science Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 13 (4): 410–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnyak, Olga. 2018b. National Styles in Science, Diplomacy, and Science Diplomacy. Leiden, New York: Brill.

  • Krasnyak, Olga. 2019 How U.S.-Soviet Scientific and Technical Exchanges Helped End the Cold War, American Diplomacy. Online. http://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2019/11/how-u-s-soviet-scientific-and-technical-exchanges-helped-end-the-cold-war/ Accessed 7 March 2021.

  • Krasnyak, Olga. 2020a. Russian Science Diplomacy. Diplomatica 2: 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnyak, Olga. 2020b. Science Diplomacy and Soviet-American Academic and Technical Exchanges. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15: 398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Keith. 1991. Military Statecraft: Power and Influence in Soviet and American Arms Transfer Relationships. International Studies Quarterly 35: 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKercher, B.J.C., ed. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Diplomacy and Statecraft. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memorandum of Conference With President Eisenhower, Washington, 22 September 1959. Office of the Historian. Online. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v10p1/d123 Accessed 8 March 2021.

  • Milne, David. 2015. Worldmaking. The Art and Science of American Diplomacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Mitchell, Lawrence, and Philip Coombs. 1962. Soviet-American Exchange of Scientists. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 18 (2): 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T.V. 2017. Recasting Statecraft: International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change. International Studies Quarterly 61 (1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Vera. 1979. US at sixes and sevens over Soviet exchanges. Nature 277: 424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Yale. 1986. U.S.-Soviet Cultural Exchanges, 1958–1986: Who Wins? Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Richmond, Yale. 2003. Cultural Exchange and the Cold War: Raising the Iron Curtain. University Park: Penn State University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Victor. 2005. Soviet-American Relations, 1953–1960: Diplomacy and Cultural Exchange during the Eisenhower Presidency. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

  • Rosenfeld, Stephen. 1964. Soviet-American Exchanges - Tit-for-Tat Goodwill. Science 143: 1413–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. 2020a. France's Science Diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. Online. https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2020/frances-science-diplomacy Assessed 8 March 2021.

  • Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. 2020b. Collaboration and Competition: The Twofold Logic of Science Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (3): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, Glenn. 1988. Who Wins in US-Soviet Science Ventures? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: 28–32.

  • Schweitzer, Glenn. 1989. Techno-diplomacy: US-Soviet Confrontations in Science and Technology. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sher, Gerson. 2019. From Pugwash to Putin: A Critical History of US-Soviet Scientific Cooperation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shifrinson, Joshua. 2018. Rising Titans, Falling Giants: How Great Powers Exploit Power Shifts. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiec, Pawel, and Philip Long. 2020. Hybridity and Soft Power Statecraft: The ‘GREAT’ Campaign. Diplomacy & Statecraft 31 (1): 168–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiec, Pawel. 2020. Between Europeanisation and Corporatisation: Poland’s Nation Branding and Soft Power for Public Consumption. East European Politics, Societies & Culture.

  • Tsygankov, Andrei. 2016. Russias Foreign Policy Change and Continuity in National Identity. Fourth Edition. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham.

  • U.S.-Soviet Scientific Exchange. 1985. Eos.Transactions American Geophysical Union 66 (9): 91.

  • Velikaya, Anna. 2020. Soviet Public Diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00193-0Assessed8March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopf, Victor, and Robert Wilson. 1980. American-Soviet scientific exchanges: More important than ever. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 36 (6): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation

  • About Implementing the Agreements between the USSR and the USA on Exchanges in the Field of Science, Technology, Education and Culture. 1960, box 44, folder 326, item 68, pp. 1–66.

  • Questions on Scientific Cooperation. 1968–1969, box 59, folder 370, item 18, pp. 67–70, 146–148.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Krasnyak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krasnyak, O. The Cold War statecraft and public diplomacy: assessing US-Soviet scientific-technical exchanges. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 54–63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00220-8

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00220-8

Keywords

Navigation