Correction to: Stem Cell Rev and Rep (2010) 6:601–610

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-010-9179-5

The authors regret to acknowledge that a non-intentional human error related to data handling during the preparation of the differentiation images in Fig. 1B (Sox17, insets) resulted in an incorrect figure. We therefore replaced the “insets of Sox17” by higher magnifications of same images from Fig. 1B of our manuscript. A replacement to Fig. 1 is included below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

figure a