Abstract
The present study was carried out at two altitudinal zones in the Renuka forest Division in Himachal Pradesh (Western Himalaya, India) and explored provisioning services use patterns to understand mountain people’s dependency on the adjacent forest. A total of 29 villages were surveyed for the study of forest ecosystem services in relation to their socioeconomic status. Average fuelwood and fodder consumption were found to be 2.3 kg−1 capita−1 day−1 and 46.02 kg household−1 day−1 in the higher altitudinal zone and 1.70 kg capita−1 day−1 and 46.0 kg household−1 day−1, in the lower altitudinal zone which were greater consumption rates than earlier reported values from western Himalaya. Due to the remote area and poor socio-economic status of the locals, they are largely dependent on nearby forests for provisioning services. Planting of trees for fuelwood and fodder on less used, barren land, increased availability of alternative sources of fuelwood and establishment of fodder banks could be alternatives to bridge the gap between demand and supply. Also, the active participation of local people is imperative for the effective conservation of these forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad A, Liu Q-J, Nizami S, Mannan A, Saeed S (2018) Carbon emission from deforestation, forest degradation and wood harvest in the temperate region of Hindukush Himalaya, Pakistan between 1994 and 2016. Land Use Policy 78:781–790
Anonymous (1999) Management plan for Renuka Forest Division: 1999–2000 to 2013–2014. Working plan, Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh forest department
Asaduzzaman M, Latif A (2005) Energy for rural households: towards rural energy strategies in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, Dhaka
Badola R (1998) Attitudes of local people towards conservation and alternatives to forest resources: a case study from the lower Himalayas. Biodivers Conserv 7:1245–1259
Bajracharya S (2008) Community carbon forestry: remote sensing of forest carbon and forest degradation in Nepal. Master’s Thesis, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, The Netherlands
Baskent EZ (2020) A framework for characterizing and regulating ecosystem services in a management planning context. Forests 11:102. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010102
Basnet S, Karki BS (2020) REDD+ across transboundary landscapes: a look into the opportunities and challenges of participatory forest management systems in receiving results based Payments in the Hindu Kush Himalayan Region. Small Scale For 19:399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09448-3
Bernstein AS (2014) Biological diversity and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 35:153–167
Bhatt BP, Sachan MS (2004) Firewood consumption pattern of different tribal communities in northeast India. Energy Policy 32(1):1–6
Bhatt BP, Negi AK, Todaria NP (1994) Fuelwood consumption pattern at different altitudes in Garhwal Himalaya. Energy 19(4):465–468
Brown, T. C. Bergstrom, J. C. and Loomis, J. B. 2006. Ecosystem goods and services: definition, valuation and provision. USDA Forest Service RMRS-RWU-4851. Discussion paper [Internet]. p.3.[cited 2011 Jul 2]. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/value/docs/ ecosystem_goods_services. pdf.
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hopper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67
Census of India (2011) Population census 2011. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi
Charmakar S, Oli BN, Joshi NR et al (2021) Forest carbon storage and species richness in FSC certified and non-certified community forests in Nepal. Small Scale For. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09464-3
Daily GC, Matson PA, Vitousek PM (1997) Ecosystem services supplied by soil. In: Daily G (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, pp 113–132
de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Roelof MJB (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408
de Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning management and decision making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen
de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 6:453–462
Devkota F (2013) Climate Change and its socio-cultural impact in the Himalayan region of Nepal—a visual documentation, anthrovision. http://journals.openedition.org/anthrovision/589; https://doi.org/10.4000/anthrovision.589
Dhamala MK, Aryal PC, Suwal MK et al (2020) Population structure and regeneration of Himalayan endemic Larix species in three high-altitude valleys in Nepal Himalaya. J Ecol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-00166-7
Dhyani S, Dhyani D (2016) Significance of provisioning ecosystem services from moist temperate forest ecosystems: lessons from upper Kedarnath valley, Garhwal, India. Energy Ecol Environ 1(2):109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-016-0008-9
Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK (2012) Fodder banks can reduce women drudgery and anthropogenic pressure from forests of Western Himalaya. Curr Sci 103(7):763
Donovan DG (1981) Fuelwood: How Much Do We Need? Institute of Current World Affairs, Hanover, p 23
de Gómez-Baggethun E, Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218
del Río-Mena T, Willemen L, Tesfamariam GT, Beukes O, Nelson A (2020) Remote sensing for mapping ecosystem services to support evaluation of ecological restoration interventions in an arid landscape. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106182
FAO (2009) Biomass energy in the Asia-Pacific region: current status, trends and future setting. Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study II. Working Paper No. APFSOS II/WP/2009/26. FAO, Bangkok
Gunatilake H (1998) The role of rural development in protecting tropical forests: evidence from Sri Lanka. J Environ Mang 53:273–292
Haripriya GS, Sanyal S, Sinha R, Sukhdev P (2005) Estimating the value of agricultural cropland and pastureland in India, Monograph 2, GAISP(Green Accounting for Indian States Project). Green India State Trust, Published by TERI, New
Hassan MK, Halder P, Pelkonen P, Pappinen A (2013) Rural households’ preferences and attitudes towards biomass fuels—results from a comprehensive field survey in Bangladesh. Energy Sustain Soc 3:24
Hassan MK, Pelkonen P, Halder P, Pappinen A (2012) An analysis of crosssectional variation in energy consumption pattern at the household level in disregarded rural Bangladesh. J Basic Appl Sci Res 2(4):3949–3963
Hedge MS (1984) Fuel problem in villages: challenges and opportunities. Bull Sci 8:8–13
Hickel J (2020) The sustainable development index: measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecol Econ 167:106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011
Hlaing ZC, Kamiyama C, Saito O (2017) Interaction between rural people’s basic needs and forest products: a case study of the Katha District of Myanmar. Int J For Res 2017, Article ID 2105012 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2105012
Hough RL (2014) Biodiversity and human health: evidence for causality? Biodivers Conserv 23(2):267–288
IEA, IRENA, UNSD, WB, WHO (2019), Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2019, Washington, DC
Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General (2019) Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: the future is now—science for achieving sustainable development. United Nations, New York
Jewitt S, Atagher P, Clifford M (2020) “We cannot stop cooking”: stove stacking, sea-sonality and the risky practices of household cookstove transitions in Nigeria. Energy Res Soc Sci 61:101340
Joshi BC, Rawal RS, Sekar KC et al (2020) Assessment of fuelwood resource preference in representative watershed of west Himalaya, India: conservation and management implications. Environ Dev Sustain 22:1617–1632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0245-5
Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
Lakerveld RP, Lele S, Crane TA, Fortuin KPJ, Springate-Baginski O (2015) The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosyst Serv 14:56–66
Lambin EF (1999) Monitoring forest degradation in tropical regions by remote sensing: some methodological issues. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8(3–4):191–198
Lele S, Springate-Baginski O, Lakerveld R, Deb D, Dash P (2013) Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives. Conserv Soc 11:343–358
Mahat TBS, Grigffin DM, Shepherd KP (1987) Human impact on some forest of the middle hills of Nepal. Part 4: a detailed study in Southeast Sindhu Palanchock and Northeast Kabhere Palanchock. Mt Res Dev 7:114–134
Malhi Y, Meir P, Brown S (2002) Forests, carbon and global climate. Philos Trans Math Phys Eng Sci 360(1797):1567–1591
Malik ZA, Bhat JA, Bhat AB (2014) Forest resource use pattern in Kedarnath wildlife sanctuary and its fringe areas (a case study from Western Himalaya, India). Energy Policy 67:138–145
Miah MD, Ahmed R, Uddin MB (2003) Biomass fuels use by the rural households in Chittagong region, Bangladesh. Biomass Bioenerg 24(4/5):277–283
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington
Mukul SA, Sohel MSI, Herbohn J, Inostroza L, König H (2017) Integrating ecosystem services supply potential from future land-use scenarios in protected area management: a Bangladesh case study. Ecosyst Serv 26:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.001
Norgaard RB (2010) Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ 69:1219–1227
Pandey R (2008) Contribution of forestry and human development index of forest department community of Jaunsar Area. Project Report, Statistical Branch, Forest research institute, ICFRE, Dehradun
Pandey R (2011a) Forest biomass extraction for livestock feed and associated carbon analysis in lower Himalayas, India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 16:879–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9300-3
Pandey R (2011b) Domestic burning of fuelwood in a subsistence tribal economy of lower Himalayas, India: some implications based on exploratory analysis. Small Scale For. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9172-0
Rendón OR, Garbutt A, Skov MA (2019) framework linking ecosystem services and human well-being: saltmarsh as a case study. People and Nature 1:486–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10050
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2004) The Ecosystem Approach, (CBD Guidelines) Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
Shaheen H, Qureshi RA, Ullah Z, Ahmad T (2011) Anthropogenic pressures on the Western Himalayan moist temperate forests of Bagh, Azad Jammu & Kashmir. Pak J Bot 43(1):695–703
Sharma CM, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2009) Forest resource use patterns in relation to socioeconomic status. Mt Res Dev 29(4):308–319
Singh G, Rawat GS, Verma D (2010) Comparative study of fuelwood consumption by villagers and seasonal Dhaba owners in the tourist affected regions of Garhwal Himalaya India. Energy Policy 38(4):1895–1899
Singh JS, Singh SP, Pam J (1988) Fodder and fuelwood resources of centralhimalaya: problems and solutions. Project Report, Planning Commission, GOI, New Delhi, p 159.
Singh SP (2002) Balancing the approaches of environmental conservation by considering ecosystem services as well as biodiversity. Curr Sci 82(11):1331–1335
Soussan J, Gevers E, Ghimire K, O’Keefee P (1991) Planning for sustainability: access to firewood in Dhanusha district, Nepal. World Dev 20(10):1299–1314
TEEB (2008) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB), an interim report. European Commission, Brussels. http://www.teebweb.org/media/2008/05/TEEB-Interim-Report_English.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2012
TEEB (2009) TEEB for policy makers—summary: responding to the value of nature. Bonn: TEEB. www.teebweb.org/Portals/25/Documents/TEEB%20for%20National%20Policy%20Makers/TEEB%20for%20Policy%20exec%20English.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2012
TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London (UK): Earthscan UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2010) Progress and steps towards delivery. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC
Troncoso K, da Silva AS (2017) LPG fuel subsidies in Latin America and the use of solid fuels to cook. Energy Policy 107:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.046
Verolme HJH, Moussa J (1999) Addressing the underlying causes of deforestation and forest degradation—case studies: analysis and policy recommendations. Biodiversity Action Network, Washington
World Bank Bangladesh Development Series (2008) Paper no. 26. In: Poverty assessment for Bangladesh: creating opportunities and bridging the east–west divide. The World Bank Office, Dhaka
Xu J et al (2019) Sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. In: Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha A (eds) The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yadav, V.K., Yadav, S., Adhikari, B.S. et al. Forest Provisioning Services Use Pattern: A Case Study from Renuka Forest Division, Western Himalaya. Small-scale Forestry 21, 55–70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-021-09487-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-021-09487-4