Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical analysis of PAM-N and M-QAM BER computation with single-sideband signal

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the theoretical bit error rate (BER) of N-level pulse amplitude modulation (PAM-N) and M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (M-QAM) have been studied and compared under different scenarios, including (i) PAM with intensity modulation with direct detection (IM/DD) and field modulation with detection (FMD) (including coherent detection and single-sideband modulation with direct detection (SSB-DD)), and (ii) QAM with coherent detection and SSB-DD. Considering the relationship between the symbol spacing and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), we provide the mathematical BER equations, including the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) and carrier-to-signal power ratio (CSPR), especially for PAM signals. To verify the validity of our theoretical expressions for SSB systems, transmissions with 224-Gb/s SSB-PAM4/16QAM signals using the Kramers-Kronig (KK) receiver were implemented on a unified optical system platform. The simulation results agreed well with theoretical calculations both in back-to-back (BtB) and 120-km transmission scenarios, which showed that the BER evaluation methods can serve as a theoretical guidance and system assessment criteria for SSB scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhong K P, Zhou X, Huo J H, et al. Digital signal processing for short-reach optical communications: a review of current technologies and future trends. J Lightwave Technol, 2018, 36: 377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang X L, Zhang C F, Chen C, et al. Non-optical carrier SSB-OFDM PONs with the improved receiver sensitivity and potential transmission nonlinearity tolerance. IEEE Photonics J, 2017, 9: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu M Y, Zhang J, Yi X W, et al. Optical single side-band Nyquist PAM-4 transmission using dual-drive MZM modulation and direct detection. Opt Express, 2018, 26: 6629–6638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu Y X, Zou K H, Chen Z Y, et al. 224 Gb/s optical carrier-assisted Nyquist 16-QAM half-cycle single-sideband direct detection transmission over 160 km SSMF. J Lightwave Technol, 2017, 35: 1557–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Le S T, Schuh K, Chagnon M, et al. 1.72-Tb/s virtual-carrier-assisted direct-detection transmission over 200 km. J Lightwave Technol, 2018, 36: 1347–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang X L, Zhang C F, Chen C, et al. Digital chromatic dispersion pre-management for SSB modulation direct-detection optical transmission systems. Optics Commun, 2018, 427: 551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li A, Peng W-R, Cui Y, et al. 112 GBd virtual-carrier assisted single-sideband PAM4 with Kramers-Kronig detection and blind adaptive IQ imbalance compensation. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. 5

  8. Mecozzi A, Antonelli C, Shtaif M. Kramers-Kronig coherent receiver. Optica, 2016, 3: 1220–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mecozzi A. A necessary and sufficient condition for minimum phase and implications for phase retrieval. 2016. ArXiv:1606.04861

  10. Li Z, Erkilinc M S, Shi K, et al. SSBI mitigation and the Kramers-Kronig scheme in single-sideband direct-detection transmission with receiver-based electronic dispersion compensation. J Lightwave Technol, 2017, 35: 1887–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu J H, Letaief K B, Chuang J C I, et al. M-PSK and M-QAM BER computation using signal-space concepts. IEEE Trans Commun, 1999, 47: 181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang L-L, Hanzo L. A recursive algorithm for the error probability evaluation of M-QAM. IEEE Commun Lett, 2000, 4: 304–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Szczerba K, Westbergh P, Karout J, et al. 4-PAM for high-speed short-range optical communications. J Opt Commun Netw, 2012, 4: 885–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Szczerba K, Westbergh P, Agrell E, et al. Comparison of intersymbol interference power penalties for OOK and 4-PAM in short-range optical links. J Lightwave Technol, 2013, 31: 3525–3534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chagnon M, Osman M, Poulin M, et al. Experimental study of 112 Gb/s short reach transmission employing PAM formats and SiP intensity modulator at 13 µm. Opt Express, 2014, 22: 21018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu D X, Lau A P T, Lu C, et al. Theoretical CSPR analysis and performance comparison for four single-sideband modulation schemes with Kramers-Kronig receiver. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 166257–166267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Antonelli C, Mecozzi A, Shtaif M. Kramers-Kronig PAM transceiver and two-sided polarization-multiplexed Kramers-Kronig transceiver. J Lightwave Technol, 2018, 36: 468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Luo M, Li C, et al. Direct detection of pilot-assisted PAM-4 signals with large phase noise tolerance. Opt Lett, 2019, 44: 5457–5460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bo T W, Kim H. Kramers-Kronig receiver without upsampling. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2018. 2

  20. Zhou X, Lu C, Lau A P T, et al. Low-complexity carrier phase recovery for square M-QAM based on S-BPS algorithm. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2014, 26: 1863–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou X, Zhong K P, Gao Y L, et al. Modulation-format-independent blind phase search algorithm for coherent optical square M-QAM systems. Opt Express, 2014, 22: 24044–24054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun C, Che D, Ji H L, et al. Study of chromatic dispersion impacts on Kramers-Kronig and SSBI iterative cancellation receiver. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2019, 31: 303–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu M Y, Zhang J, Huang X T, et al. Influence of EEPN and P2A noise with CD pre- and post-compensation in optical SSB transmission and Kramers-Kronig receiver system. Opt Express, 2019, 27: 19664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Le S T, Schuh K. Experimental verification of equalization enhanced phase noise in Kramers-Kronig transmissions. In: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2019. 2

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFB1803905), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61871030, 61671053), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. FRF-MP-19-009), State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems Networks, China, Open Fund of IPOC (BUPT) (Grant No. IPOC2018B009), and Foundation of Beijing Engineering and Technology Center for Convergence Networks and Ubiquitous Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xian Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, D., Zhou, X., Yang, Y. et al. Theoretical analysis of PAM-N and M-QAM BER computation with single-sideband signal. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 64, 182312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3025-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3025-4

Keywords

Navigation