Skip to main content
Log in

Tests and Finite Element Modelling of Cold-Formed Steel Zed and Hat Section Columns Under Axial Compression

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental and numerical investigation into the buckling behaviour of axially loaded cold-formed steel (CFS) zed and hat sections. In total, 12 experimental tests are reported, of those 6 tests are on CFS zed sections and the remaining 6 are on CFS hat sections. The failure modes, ultimate loads, and load–displacement curves of the specimens were reported and analyzed. The experiments revealed the deformation mechanism of both the zed and hat sections failing in distortional mode. Nonlinear finite element (FE) models are then described for both the zed and hat sections, which include material non-linearity and geometric imperfections. The validated finite element models were then used for the purpose of parametric studies comprising 140 models, which include 70 models each for CFS zed and hat sections. Ten different cross-sections were analyzed in the parametric study for both the zed and hat sections. The axial strengths obtained from the experimental tests and FE analysis were used to assess the performance of the current design guidelines as per the Direct Strength Method for both the zed and hat sections. From the comparison, it was found that the design strengths are un-conservative by 7% and 10% on average for CFS zed and hat sections, respectively. An improved design equation was therefore proposed for those CFS zed section columns, which failed by either distortional buckling or through a combination of distortional and global interactive buckling. The proposed equation gave a close comparison against FE results, being conservative to the FE results by only 3%. Reliability analysis was also performed to confirm the reliability of the proposed design equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 25 June 2021

    The first author's name was incorrectly spelled in reference part and corrected in this version.

Abbreviations

A g :

Gross area of the section

CFS:

Cold-formed steel

COV:

Coefficient of variation

df :

Depth of flange

dl :

Lip depth

DSM:

Direct strength method

dw :

Depth of web

E :

Modulus of elasticity

f od :

Distortional buckling stress

f ol :

Elastic local buckling stress

FEA:

Finite element analysis

F n :

Critical buckling stress

F u :

Ultimate tensile strength of steel

F y :

Yield strength

HS:

Hat section

L:

Unbraced member nominal length

P cre :

Elastic critical local buckling strength

P crl :

Distortional buckling strength

P crd :

Overall buckling strength

P DSM :

Design strength from the DSM

P Dl :

Un-factored design strength

P FEA :

Axial strength from FEA

P ne :

Nominal overall buckling strength

P nle :

Local global interaction buckling strength

P nl :

Local buckling strength

P nd :

Distortional buckling strength

P Proposed :

Proposed axial strength

ri :

Minimum radius of gyration

t:

Thickness of zed and hat sections

wl :

Width of lip

ZS:

Zed section

λ:

Slenderness ratio

λd :

Non-dimensional slenderness ratio

σ:

Stress

ε:

Strain

References

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishanu Roy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest between the authors or any third party regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ananthi, G.B.G., Roy, K. & Lim, J.B.P. Tests and Finite Element Modelling of Cold-Formed Steel Zed and Hat Section Columns Under Axial Compression. Int J Steel Struct 21, 1305–1331 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00504-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00504-y

Keywords

Navigation