Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring Participatory Management in Social Enterprise Practice: Evidence from Chile

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although evidence shows that it is challenging to implement, many authors state that participatory management is a distinctive attribute of social enterprises. This paper presents case study research exploring how participatory management is manifest in Chile, a country where a paternalistic and autocratic management style prevails thereby constraining the adoption of more collaborative approaches. We found that a majority of the twenty social enterprises considered, despite having very different sizes, governance structure and activity sectors, involved employees and stakeholders in shared decision-making processes. Participatory management was exhibited in distinctive and diverse ways ranging from common agreement on strategic decisions through to the presentation of new proposals by members. We conclude that social enterprises in Chile differ from conventional enterprises not only in their focus on trying to solve social problems, but also in the fact that they may provide a vehicle to promote more innovative and participatory approaches to decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulai, I. A., & Shafiwu, A. B. (2014). Participatory decision making and employee productivity: A case study of community banks in the Upper East region of Ghana. Business and Economic Journal, 5(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achleitner, A., Lutz, E., Mayer, J., & Spiess-Knafl, W. (2013). Disentangling gut feeling: Assessing the integrity of social entrepreneurs. Voluntas, 24, 93–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Gutiérrez, R., Ogliastri, E. & Reficco, E. (2006). Gestión Efectiva de los Emprendimientos Sociales. Lecciones Extraídas de Empresas y Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil Iberoamérica, Planeta Mexicana, México.

  • Bacchiega, A., & Borzaga, C. (2001). Social enterprise as an incentive structure. In C. Borzaga & J. Defourny (Eds.), The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, S. M. (1996). Participatory management within a theory of the firm. J. Corp i., 21, 657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, M. (2005). Not for the profit, but for the satisfaction? Evidence on worker well-being in non-profit firms. Kyklos, 58, 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, B., Kearns, J., & Sequeira, D. (1996). The world bank participation sourcebook. ESD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidet, E., Eum, H., & Ryu, J. (2018). Diversity of social enterprise models in South Korea. Voluntas, 29, 1261–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2001). Empowering Teachers: What Successful Principals Do? (2nd ed.). California: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2001). The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2006). Worker motivations, job satisfaction, and loyalty in public and nonprofit social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschee, J. (2001). Eight basic principles for nonprofit entrepreneurs. Nonprofit World, 19, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, R., & Sajardo, A. (2004). Economía política de los directivos de las empresas de economía social. Revista De Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 48, 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, K., & Goldsmith, J. (2002). The end of management and the rise of organizational democracy. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (1999). Governance in the participative organisation: Freedom, creativity and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, R. (2002). Strategic management for voluntary nonprofit organizations. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4, 202–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1, 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). Conceptions of social enterprise in Europe: A comparative perspective with the United States. In B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., Nyssens, M. & Brolis, O. (2019). Mapping and testing social enterprise models across the world: Evidence from the “international comparative social enterprise models (ICSEM) project”. In ICSEM working papers, N° 50.

  • Dionisio, M. (2019). The evolution of social entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 15, 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities, What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcadell, F. (2005). Democracia, cooperación y éxito: Implicaciones prácticas del caso de Mondragón (pp. 54–67). Universia Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiger, L., Nyssens, M., & Wanderley, F. (2019). Social enterprise in Latin America. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gatica, S. (2011). Emprendimiento e innovación social. Construyendo una agenda pública para Chile. Centro de Políticas Públicas UC, Año 6 N°48.

  • Gatica, S. (2015). Understanding the phenomenon of Chilean social enterprises under the lens of Kerlin’s Approach, contributions and limitations. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(2), 202–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germak, A., & Singh, K. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Changing the way social workers do business. Administrations in Social Work, 34, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini, M., & Nachar, P. (2017). Social enterprise in Chile: Concepts, historical trajectories, trends and characteristics. In: ICSEM working papers, No. 45, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.

  • Gleerup, J., Hulgaard, L., & Teasdale, S. (2019). Action research and participatory democracy in social enterprise. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, C. P., Carrara, K., & Schmittel, R. M. (2016). The phenomenon of social enterprises: Are we keeping watch on this cultural practice? Voluntas, 27, 1585–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2006). Qualitative research in management: Addressing complexity, context and persona. Management Decision, 44, 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. (1990). Desarrollo humano, informe 1990. Colombia: Tercer Mundo Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2001). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement British. Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, E. (2006). The ironic value of loyalty dispute resolution strategies in worker cooperatives and conventional organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwee, N. J., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factor on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irarrázaval, I. (2005). Participación Ciudadana en Programas de Reducción de la Pobreza en América Latina: Experiencias en Argentina, Chile, Perú y Paraguay, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Recovered from: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Participaci%C3%B3n-Ciudadana-en-Programas-de-Reducci%C3%B3n-de-la-Pobreza-en-Am%C3%A9rica-Latina-Experiencias-en-Argentina-Chile-Per%C3%BA-y-Paraguay.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  • Irarrázaval, I. (2006), “Estudio comparativo del sector sin fines de lucro en Chile”. Recovered from: www.pnud.cl/publicaciones/organizaciones-sin-fines-lucro.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  • Ismail, A., & Johnson, B. (2019). Managing organizational paradoxes in social enterprise. Case studies from the MENA region. Voluntas, 30, 516–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarley, P., Florito, J., & Delaney, J. T. (1997). A structural contingency approach to bure-aucracy and democracy in US. National Unions. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 831–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandathil, G. M., & Varman, R. (2007). Contradictions of employee involvement, information sharing and expectations: A case study of an Indian worker cooperative. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 28(1), 140–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. (2010). A comparative analysis of the global emergence of social enterprise. Voluntas, 21(2), 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. (2012). Defining social enterprise across different contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 84–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, G., & Hems, L. (2004). Sociétés coopératives d´intérêt collectif: The arrival of social enterprise within the French social economy. Voluntas, 15, 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., Moss, T. W., Gras, D. M., Kato, S., & Amezcua, A. S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all? Small Business Economics, 40(3), 761–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, K. M. (2013). Social enterprise in Latin America: Dimensions of collaboration among social entrepreneurs, School of Public Policy Capstones. 23. Recovered from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cppa_capstones/23. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  • Mancino, A., & Thomas, A. (2005). An Italian pattern of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manville, B., & Ober, J. (2003). A company of citizens. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., & Miller, J. (2003). NGOs and the development of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Understanding large-scale interorganizational systems. Voluntas, 14, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, P. G. (2005). Paternalism as a positive form of leadership in the Latin American context: Leader Benevolence, decision-Making control and human resource management practices. In M. Elvira & A. Davila (Eds.), Managing human resources in Latin America: An Agenda for International Leaders. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Doherty, B. (2016). A fair trade-off? Paradoxes in the governance of fair-trade social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLagan, P., & Nel, C. (1997). The age of participation: New governance for the workplace and the world. Berrett Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melian, A., & Campos, V. (2010). Emprendedurismo y economía social como mecanismos de inserción sociolaboral en tiempos de crisis. Revesco, 100, 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (2020). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Recovered from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/participate. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  • Muñoz, P., Kimmitt, J., Serey, T. & Velásquez, L. (2016) Estructura y Dinámica del Emprendimiento Social en Chile, Reporte 2016. Universidad del Desarrollo. Recovered from https://repositorio.udd.cl/handle/11447/746. Accessed15 June 2020.

  • Nicolás Martínez, C., Rubio Bañón, A., & Fernández Laviada, A. (2019). Social Entrepreneur: Same or Different from the Rest? Voluntas, 30, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noruzi, M., Estover, J., & Rahimi, G. (2010). An exploration of social entrepreneurship in the entrepreneurship era. Asian Social Science, 6, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohana, M., & Meyer, M. (2010). Should I stay or should I go now? Investigating the intention to quit of the permanent staff in social enterprises. European Management Journal, 28(6), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohana, M., Meyer, M., & Swaton, S. (2012). Decision-making in social enterprises: Exploring the link between employee participation and organizational commitment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1092–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okano, M. (2019). Social Enterprise in the current context: A Systematic review of the last 10 years. Risus-Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 10, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunji, F., Nwachukwu, C., Worlu, R., Ogunnaike, O., & Abimbola, A. (2017). Empirical assessment of the link between participatory decision-making and firm performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 16(4), 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osland, J. S., Franco, S., & Osland, A. (1999). Organizational implications of Latin American culture: Lessons for the expatriate manager. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärenson, T. (2011). The criteria for a solid impact evaluation in social entrepreneurship. Society and Business Review., 6(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppelenbos, L. (2005). The Chilean Miracle: Patrimonialism in a Modern Free Market Democracy. The Netherlands: Marcelis-Van der Lee-Adu BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L., & Bacic, M. (2011). Programas de emancipación económica y economía social: Avances y dificultades del aprendizaje social en Brasil. Revista De Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 70, 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, G., Eades, E., & Wilson, J. (2012). Managing human resources in the Latin American context: The case of Chile. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3133–3150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas, 23, 1102–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V., & Hulgard, L. (2016). Participatory governance in social enterprise. Voluntas, 27, 1742–1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pojidaeff, D. (1995). The core principles of participative management. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(7), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quagraine, T. L., & Asiedu-Appiah, F. (2019). Causes and consequence of low employee involvement or participation in decision-making: A case study of merchant bank (Ghana) limited. Advance Journal of Management, Accounting and Finance, 4, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W., & Turbide, J. (2012). Board/staff relationships in a growth crisis: Implications for nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1651–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, S. R., & Steers, R. M. (1981). Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations, 34(12), 1013–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, D. (1982). Formación de Oligarquías en Procesos de Autogestión. Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, D., & Rios, R. (2009). Paternalism at the crossroads: Labour relations in Chile in transition. Employee Relations, 31(3), 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, E. J. (2004). Latin American leadership: El patrón and el líder moderno. Cross Cultural Management, 11(3), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainteny, G. (2002). Estudio de las élites políticas en Francia. Revista De Estudios Políticos, No., 118, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shangholi, R., Hussin, S., Siraj, S., Naimie, A., Assadzadeh, F., & Al-, H. H. (2010). Investigation on participatory management and identify the constraints. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship. Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14, 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: An investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 341–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas, 15, 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A., & Marinangeli, B. (2016). Social reporting and voluntary disclosure in Italian credit cooperative banks. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 13, 178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, A. (2002). De la participación a la gestión del conocimiento y del capital intelectual: Reflexiones en torno a la empresa cooperativa. Revista De Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 40, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp, M. J., Royakkers, L. M. M., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2011). From cowboys to diplomats: Challenges for social entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. Voluntas, 22(2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandonai, F., & Pezzini, E. (2004). Nuevos directivos para nuevas cooperativas. La figura del empresario social en las cooperativas sociales italianas. Revista De Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 48, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 3363, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile

    Cristian A. Muñoz

  2. International Center for Social Economy and Cooperativism, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 3363, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile

    Ana María Dávila & Mario Radrigán

  3. Haydn Green Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK

    Simon Mosey

Authors
  1. Cristian A. Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana María Dávila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon Mosey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario Radrigán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristian A. Muñoz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muñoz, C.A., Dávila, A.M., Mosey, S. et al. Exploring Participatory Management in Social Enterprise Practice: Evidence from Chile. Voluntas 32, 1096–1112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00367-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00367-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation