Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adolescents Adjudicated for Sexual Offending: A Comparison Between Sex-Only and Sex-Plus

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

One of the most consolidated classifications of adolescents adjudicated for sexual offending (ASO) is based on their antisocial behavior background. This allows identifying sex-only and sex-plus ASO. However, limited research related to this classification has been focused on relevant risk factors, such as sexual development, and none of them has been conducted in Spain.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 73 ASO. Data collection took place between 2013 and 2015. They were divided into sex-only (n = 33) and sex-plus (n = 40). Assessments included reviews of official files, interviews with professionals in charge, and interviews with the ASO. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to compare intergroup differences.

Results

No significant differences between groups in family background, history of maltreatment, and sexual development variables were found. Sex-plus had a significantly higher prevalence of disruptive behavior at school, school absenteeism, substance consumption, and antisocial misconduct with peers. Significant differences between groups were also found in some sexual crime variables. Logistic regression analyses showed that antisocial behavior with peers and school absenteeism were related to sex-plus.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the importance of assessing sexual development and family background when intervening with ASO. Sexual development-related variables should be further examined to understand their involvement in sexually coercive behaviors.

Policy Implications

The identification of specific criminogenic needs for each offense pathway would benefit court decisions and more tailored interventions to reduce recidivism. These treatments should include family interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data supporting this study are not available.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Spanish Juvenile Justice System authorities that gave permission and made this research possible. We would also like to thank the staff of all services for their assistance during the duration of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the work and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Siria.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval was obtained separately through the Juvenile Justice System authorities that gave the permission to develop the study.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from participants over 18 years old, and from participants’ parents or legal guardians when they were under the age of 18.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siria, S., Echeburúa, E. & Amor, P.J. Adolescents Adjudicated for Sexual Offending: A Comparison Between Sex-Only and Sex-Plus. Sex Res Soc Policy 18, 981–991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00604-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00604-8

Keywords

Navigation